November 25th, 1974

(c) Parcel "T" (Plan with Charge Deposited 5541C) District Lot
379, Group 1, New Westminster District, to the M-3 (Special

Industrial) Zone proposed to be established under the terms of
By-law No. 1335 mentioned above.

That Part of Lot 6, District Lot 379, Group 1, Plan 3158, New
Westminster District now zoned M-1 (General Industrial) to the
M-3 (Special Industrial) Zone proposed to be established under
the terms of By-law No. 1335 mentioned above; except for a

small portion of the said property lying adjacent to the
Coquitlam River which is to be rezoned A-l (Agricultural).
The property above described is located on the South side of the

2500 block Davies Avenue and has the civic addresses of 2526, 2336,

2592, and 2596 Davies Avenue.

A number of residents of the area were in attendance and on invitation
of His Worship the Mayor, were given the opportunity to express their
views.

Mr. George Forsythe, 3273 Lancaster Street, mentioned that about

two years ago the Council agreed to residential zoning in the Lancaster

Place area, and pointed out that there are already two junk yards on

Davies Avenue. Mr. Forsythe inquired why the Davies Avenue property

should be zoned Industrial when there other areas in the City zoned for
industry, and stated he was opposed to the proposed rezoning on Davies
Avenue.

The City Clerk advised that he had received a petition earlier in
the evening from the Wrong Side of the Tracks Action Association containing
approximately 127 names representing about 114 separate addresses,
wherein opposition to the proposed M-3 zoning of the Huntington Rubber
site was stated.

Mr. Van Gilder, 2620 Gordon Avenue, inquired as to the reason for
proposing industrial uses when the area is substantially residential,
and he commented on the unsatisfactory access and egress residents are
presently experiencing and he expressed his opposition to industrial zoning
in that area.

Mr. A. MacDonald, 3130 Jervis Street, spoke on alternatives to the
proposed Industrial zoning, and suggested that the property could be
zoned for park purposes.

Mr. M. Tanchak, 365 Seaforth Crescent, Coquitlam, advised he was
the owner of Lots 1, 2 & 3, proposed to be rezoned to M-3 under the
Amending By-law, and stated he was interested in the effect of the
zoning on his property. The City Planner advised that the entire area
proposed to be rezoned covers the whole triangular piece bounded by the

CP Rail, Davies Avenue and Hastings Street and covers all the Huntington