Published Weekfy ct ROOM 164, SHELLY BUILDING 1419 West Pender Street Vaneouver, B.C. by the PE OPLES PUBLISHING CO. MArine 5288 : FOSEEESEESINSSCSECSESESTLERETTEEetes @<—~ EDITORIAL BOARD Nigel Morgan Maurice Rush Mimerva Cooper Al Parkin TOM McEWEN ._. Editor EVAGN] “BIR GHA RD oe oe eG ee ee Manager Subscription Rates: 1 Year, $2.00; 6 Months, $1.00 Printed by East End Printers, 2303 East Hastings Street, Vancouver, B.G. Authorized as second-elass mail bg the post-office dept., Oftawa No Diversion! (ees are any number of comments that could be made on the reasons for the current press hysteria over espi- onage in Canada. The whole affair could be attributed to an attempt to divert the public from the very tight spot that Canada, Britain and the U.S. find’ themselves through their dirty work in Greece, Indonesia and Iran. It might also cor- rectly be laid to an attempt by Canadian reaction to side- track public attention from such critical domestic issues as housing and the need for wage increases. For 1i we examine for a moment the substance of the al- most unprecedented speculation and wild rumor that has flooded the pages of the press, its very hollowness is appar- ent for all to see. Take the charge that the search for tht atom bomb “secret’’ was one reason for the alleged espionage. Well, this week Dyson Carter, the science writer, reminded B.C. audiences that Nels Bohr, the great Danish scientist who was one of the five or six key men in the world who possessed the facts of the atom bomb, left America last fall for the Soviet Union, where he has since been working with the equally famous Russian nuclear scientist, Peter Kapitsa. It was these two men who recently announced from Moscow some new discoveries from their joint researches in atomic energy. Since Nels Bohr knows more about the atom bomb than any Canadian or British scientist, it is simply absurd to claim that the alleged espionage ring had as its object the capturing of the atom “‘secret.”’ But espionage or not, it is quite clear that the current “Red scare’ will divert many people’s attention unless the labor movement reacts quickly to dispel the confusion and keep the public gaze focussed on the real questions at issue— housing, wages, and the winning of the peace. “Operation Shaughnessy’ Eo press reports we learn that General Hotimeister has inaugurated a new force—the ‘Veterans’ Patrol and In- vestigation Service, Ltd.,’’ and has turned its supervision over to R. I. Morgan, former army captain. The first operation of the new force is to patrol Shaugh- nessey Heights, the palatial residential area of Vancouyer’s upper crust. The patrolmen will wear uniforms and will be armed with hefty night-sicks. Mr. Hoffmeister describes the new force as “a constructive enterprise, and will provide employment for returned vet- €tans,-and is in every way worthy of the support of all Van- couver citizens.’ It is rumored that the directorate of the mew force are contacting Vancouver’s big industrialists and “selling” them the idea of the new force. Organized labor is fully in accord with the proper and efficient policing of Vancouver and environs. The regular pol- ice force could well be augmented by two hundred or so re- turned veterans. But organized labor can only view with suspicion the creation of a uniformed force which, with its “semi-status of police authority, lends itself readily to the possibility of a strike-breaking anti-labor vigilante movement. _, General Hoffmeister has the record of a very gallant sol- _dier; this is why veterans look to him for leadership in their many problems of rehabilitation—jobs, homes, decent Wages, etc. Since his return to Canada, however, he has manifested an attitude of hostility to organized labor, which has not been conducive to good veteran-labor relations. His statements regarding foreign-speaking communities have come under a good deal of criticism by community papers, Most of his racist theories smack of “Mein Kampf.” Labor is therefore justified in looking upon the General’s latest creation with some sus- picion. : PACIFIC TRIBUNE — PAGE 4 “Zinoviev Letter’ Ghost — OF 1924 Intrigue 2% tom mewer qo history of the “incident” of the infamous “Finoviey letter’—one of many tory in- trigues to.foment hostility against the USSR, and at the same time clamp down on labor at home, has a special significance at this time. In 1924 the first Labor Government, under the leadership of the late Ramsay McDonald, came to power. It had es- Ee tablished — under pressure from the British workers, diplomatic and trade rela- tions with the USSR. The McDonald government was moving very carefully “in office,” and the main pleas of its personnel and sup- porters, when under fire for net getting things done was, “Give us a -chance, we haven’t got a sufficient majority.” Its chance came in October of 1924; the tories, under the leadership of the arch-con- spirators, Baldwin, Chamberlain and Churchill, were whooping it up for “empire preference, and. presenting “socialism,” i.e., La or, as the main stumbling block to “prosperity.” McDon- ald, the social democrat, instead of rallying the nation against these tory intrigues, whined and whimpered about “British fair play,’ as if any tory ever worried about fair play where their partisan and class interests were involved? The tories remembering the “Guy Fawkes Plot” to blow up Parliament, conceived an eyen more deadly plot—to blow up the Labor goyern- ment. Gregory Zinoviev, at that time general secretary of the Communist International (and since executed by a Soviet People’s Tribunal for conspiring with the enemies of the USSR in Berlin, Paris, and London) was alleged to have written a letter to Arthur McManus, leader of the British (Communist Party. This fake letter was supposed to have fallen into the hands of the Rothermere press, and subsequently (and all in the scheme of things) into the hands of the British Foreign Office. The létter was pur- ported to be (also quite ney ray ) subversive of British institutions, government, etc., and could only be construed (also quite in the scheme of things) as being an “unwarranted interfer- ence in internal affairs by a foreign pcewer.’ The tories and their spineless bootblacks in the ranks of the social-democrats could never adjust themselves to the realization that the Communist International and the Soviet Govern- ment were totally unrelated te each other. It suited their purpose ... and still does (in spite of the fact that the C.I. has been dissolved), to regard the Communist parties as the “agents of Moscow.” A committee of the government was set up to investigate the authenticity of the Zinoviev letter. The Soviet Government and the USSR plenipotentiary in London, M. Rakovsky, de- clared the “letter” a clumsy forgery, calculated to provoke a break in Anglo-Soviet relations. The British Foreign Office, with McDon- _ald’s authorization, forwarded a sharp note to the Soviet Government, charging “internal in- terference,” even before the Committee of In- vestigation had made its report, and even when large sections of the Labor Party were demand- ing that McDonald repudiate this tory censpir- FROM YESTERDAY’S FILES AFTER listening to Bevin’s blast on “Russian propaganda” during the sessions of the UNO, Andrei WVishinsky said the Soviet delegates “felt the cold breath of an unhappy past.” How cold-this “cold breath’ was we can see from the press files of yesterday. OTTAWA, March 2, 1939 (CP) —“The Prime Minister’s office said last night that it is not considered an offense under the Foreign Enlist- ments’ Act of 1937 for any person in Canada to volunteer for service with the Finnish forces.” It was considered an offense under the same Act, and by the same Prime Minister’s office, for any person in Canada to volunteer to serve with the democratic forces of Republican Spain to fight Franco = Mussolini - Hitler fascism in 1936-37. NEW YORK, March 2, 1942 (CP). —“‘The Daily News said today the Finnish War Veter- ans in America hope to be able to send to Finland through Canada more than 9,000 citi-_ zens who have volunteered to fight for the little republic (Finland) against Russia.” “The first detachment that eventually may place thousands of American citizens behind the fighting lines of Finland will sail today as mem- bers of the crew of an unidentified freighter. The News added that these volunteers “will be acy as a crude forgery which later it w itely established to be. : | McDonald, wheedling for tory an votes in a probable forced election, d) “resign” rather than fight the issue. Parliament. His government had just a judicial defeat in the court case a C. Campbell, editor of the British Gi paper “The Worker.” He knew the alls” ter” was in the hands of the tory ~ October -10, 1924. He knew his governi set up a committee to investigate the ; Yet he prepared a note for the Horeieg to be presented to M. Rakovsky ,if a: the “authenticity” of the. “letter” We. lished. He was pictured as a very “= Prime Minister,” when he learned that phalange in the Foreign Office had! | forwarded the note to Rakovsky, but ~ “coneurred” in the publication of the — Mr. McDonald “couldn’t understand: of confidence in his integrity, and th haste with which the tories moved in # spiracy. On Oct. 28 he bleated: i “Tf the Zinoviey letter is a forgery ij the amount of scounderliness with wh are surrounded. I am bound to say experience has made it impossible {- not te be suspicicus. If it is genuir then you can depend upon it—this nati. depend upon it; Liberals and Tories € pend upon it—that so longs as then ‘Labor government in office, so lon, | am responsible for that government, — handle with firmness and determinatior attempt by an outside power te inter | our internal affairs.” a0 How the tory conspirators must hay | at this social-democrat putty in their hay the tories of today must gloat to see ¢ of McDonald standing at Bevin’s side. | yen the “Daily Herald,” organ of th Labor Party bitterly scored McDonald. stupid naivete and his procrastination — on the offensive against the arch-cor in the tory camp. “The allesed commun would have done little harm if it had” ence denounced as a fergery ... had t Minister made his speech (on the le- Saturday mstead of on the Monday, } could have been countered,’ wrote Thi | The result of McDonald’s cowardice j a erude forgery by the tories resulted in ing victory exactly what the 4 forged the “Zinoviey letter” to do. Th provided a diversion, with a dusl pu. throw the burden of the war (1914-1) onto the backs of the British people | foment further provocations against 4) | which, on the basis of a planned Socis omy, and against insuperable difficu: lifting the standards of its people to ne while the standards of life in working’ tain were going into eclipse, in the ¢ vast industrial derelict areas, mass — | ment, and suffering. The victory of r 1924, achieved on the basis of a prove enabled the monopolists to maintain ~ profits at the expense of the comm: and first an foremost, at the expense of labor. History has a knack of repeating — always along parallel paths, but in ou ; society, almost always with a parallel —to keep labor, in what reaction deen “its place.” if paid by a group of wealthy. nobleme } New York.” OTTAWA, March 8, 1946——No x3 have been imposed upon the issue of |} to Canadians who have volunteered = ht in the Finnish forces.”—(Montreal St} PARIS, Jan. 9, 1946.—In weichin; vangtages and risks of outright All vention to help Finland, the military } “Le Temps” today arrived at the conel ;* it would be all advantage and no risk t Murmansk in the Russian north, and action in the Black Sea. : : “Then the French-British land ‘fc but well-trained and equipped for, : campaign, could land not far from ~ and co-ordinate their efforts with thc Finns to chase the Reds out of the EF “The Allied fleet could also give ch: ment to all states bordering on the _ that might produce far-reaching cons | © Le Temps’ expert concludes that the fh would cost no more “than a few battle} h cruisers, and a small number of land to cooperate with the armies of certs powers.” : a Bs Verily the “cold breath of an u at : is surely blowing now. al