poor, “SEOX A chedictton, during the 1974 general aake, at the Bastille i in Paris danaitlien wage increases and a guarantee of jobs. . BRU WE j va George Marchais (center), General Secretary of the Communist Party of France, at a Paris demonstt By Sue Devlin s PARIS ife in France isn’t easy these days. The average Frenchman works a 44hour- week. One out of three earns less than 1,500 francs a month ($340). For millions, the cost of food, clothing, rent and taxes. has become an unbearable burden. The official inflation figure for France in 1974 was 15.2% (union statistics show 17.4%). But the number-one problem here is unemployment. While the figures are not as dramatic as those in the U.S., they are frightening enough to the French worker. Over one million people are looking for a job, about 5% of the active population. Hardest hit are those under 25 (about 350,000). Next come women. There are also a growing number of engineers and tech- nicians (about 80,000 to date). The government pretends that the cri- sis hitting France and the rest of the capi- talist world is due to increased oil prices charged by the Arab nations. President Gis- card d’Estaing has called upon the French to cut down on oil consumption, thus pre- sumably keeping ‘‘cool’’ while everyone waits out the crisis together. But the Communist .Party of France isn’t buying this. They believe that while the poor here are practicing patience and getting progressively poorer, the rich are getting richer and richer. The PCF has organized a massive campaign to prove to the nation that the sacrifices called for by he government and made by the workers are going directly into the pockets of the large oil companies and other monopolies. This campaign, ‘‘Operation Truth’’ launched by the PCF in-January, explains that the only solution to the present crisis is the application of the Common Program which calls for the nationalization of France’s banks and the monopolies which dominate the key sectors of industry. The Common Program is the basis of a united front formed by the PCF, the Social- ist Party, and the radicals of the left. Last May, united front candidate Francois Mit- terrand ran for president against Giscard d’Estaing. Thirteen million French voters (49.2% of the electoral voices) showed their support for the Common Program by vot- ing for Mitterrand. To popularize its position that the crisis is not inevitable, the PCF has focused its Operation Truth on the oil scandal in France. The PCF charges that the govern- ment and the big companies are respon- sible for the crisis in France. The cam- paign began after months of insistence by Communist deputies to the Parliament that a commission be formed to investigate the practices of the oil companies in France. The commission was proposed on February 24, 1974, and not voted on until June 17, 1974. After the report ‘had been made, it took weeks to convince the National Assembly to listen to it. But now the results are out and they have led to legal action against numerous oil chieftains. The parliamentary commission ac- cused the oil companies of: e Claiming to buy crude oil at a higher price than they really can pay without any contestation on the part of the government. ® Price-fixing at a price that had no relation to cost and dividing markets among them to obtain higher profits. ¢ Paying almost no taxes. * Complicity between the companieé) and government agencies which shoul iy control prices. When the government called upon th® people to use less gasoline in 1974, col)” sumption decreased by 5.6%. The govert™) ment said it was not enough and sent out) its inspectors, thermometers in hand, control buildings to check that they welt 4 not too hot. Meanwhile, the oil companies increase the amount of gasoline they imported) : stocking the surplus to be sold at highe! prices at a later date. In 1974, the price fuel increased 64.1% in France while price paid by the companies to the aie ducing nations increased by only about 3” In a letter from the Libyan Minister of P& trol to the French Inquiry Commission was revealed that the price paid for bit gasoline in Libya actually decreased about $4 a barrel in 1974 from $16 to $12. because Libya did not apply the decisi? made by the other OPEC nations. sty To reveal this scandal to the public, the y PCF has put up 100,000 posters across the) nation, distributed eight million leaflet, ; and sold 700,000 copies. of its February y i n itv ut Md nse | “C PACIFIC TRIBUNE—FRIDAY, MARCH 21, 1975—Page 6