~20

for the balance of the area a person would have to have the written
permission of a land owner or be a land owner or lessee to obtain a
permit and the permit would be made out for that particular piece of
property only. .

3. No permit be required for the Dykes but for the balance of the open
 @€rea permits as laid os in the second proposal would be required,

; Any one of these, we reel, would do the job required, and it is only.
8 natter of which one you think isould be easiest to implement and operate,

As we stated in our initial presentation, our main concern igs not only).

to hold onto as much shooting recreational area a spossible for the public |
“cat large, but also to insure that those people vho-live and ow property in:
the area are not denied the use of their own property for hunting recreatior,
-unless it is absolutely necessary. i A

Lone If council should require any further information or if we can assist

“Ain any way, please feel free to Call ouk on us. We wish to thank council

“ for allowing us the provilege of commenting on this matter, and again apolo-.
ize for the long delay in forwarding these comments to youn es

Sincerely,

it}

Wed. Otway
Director

Pf
&

a
i
i
i

‘“.
Pa SMILES Mee Selma ite pe

a NS at ce ene