February 23rd, 1981.

From the Planning and Zoning Committee, February 13th, 1981 recommending
that rezoning application, R#32-80, to rezone property described as Lots 5
and 6 of Lot 3, Block 32, District Lot 464, Plan 14791, New Westminster
District, addressed as 1948 Coquitlam Avenue, from RS-1 to RM-4 proceed to
Public Hearing.

Moved by Alderman Keryluk:

Seconded by Alderman Wright:

That as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Committee, February 13th,
1981 rezoning application, R#32~80, to rezone property described as Lots 5
and 6 of Lot 3, Block 32, District Lot 464, Plan 14791, New Westminster

District, addressed as 1948 Coquitlam Avenue, from RS-1 to RM-4 proceed to

Public Hearing.

NEW BUSINESS:

Alderman Mabbett referred to the use of aluminum electrical wiring
and requested that the Senior Building Inspector and Fire Chief prepare a
report on the situation in Port Coquitlam.

Alderman Muldoon advised that she had recently attended a conference
on recycling at the University of British Columbia and that she had found
the same to be informative.

Alderman Muldoon referred to the forthcoming meet ing concerning the
Fraser River Estuary Study and advised that she would be attending and Mayor
Laking advised that he would also be attending.

Alderman Traboulay referred to a letter dated February 20th, 1981 that

all members of Council had received from Mr. Harold Pritchett concerning

the present lahour negotiations and he requested that it be read for the

information of the public. The City Administrator, who had been attending
negotiating meetings in Vancouver all day, advised that he would have a
report to be presented to the Council and committee later this evening.

Alderman Traboulay referred to the recent impoundment of a dog owned
by the Potvin family that had been discussed in Council last week and Mayor
Laking advised that the $.P.C.A. would appreciate it if this matter was
not further discussed. Alderman Traboulay then commented that the policy
of acceptance by the S.P.C.A. of cheques for adoption of animals but not

for the reclaiming of impounded animals should be reviewed.