. iv AH ARIC Ke
SEO SH HEIR Sea ey

3 Paet ePeia se 4% trait snd
Ai vt 3 a : ft! vA Gap
1 a TA eat Pa MEAD i wilt ee hdd F hit " } f
isi i Taye lh Pty ay aged ih : i ts a Vat it i Lamina "
set Pe ARUN APH AAA pial) By ee Seana ea {
i ty! : i I POAC TUR URIALORN Behe rf
re gr atettats Se ul A Te MAIER ROR Or CML aHY PN ;
eu HAAR GN Ee Ce SIU Een aR ALG nr Ae De ENE NOR ION A Gere ay
RN He Ae ; Rh AMEN SMLATA Eg Po A OA LAD nd RON LAG a an oe! aa RR smijattirleneariniotcies reicteape betaine AAACN LL Laas MIA
Hee ny eta aN Tn EARLE 4 Aah RARER ENS Ais) aN Ge ehh id hi Labor ent MCR GRU AL lanl 8 CPT SALA SAAR hhc AMAA LA Lee AR ae LTH LL Trane tan : a saan Astin FOr lan
j yoy fin dd aa REN rye fy eS pire ; ney eecbronad ROCA Ton NEM PATENT AAPL tule a Wtipd sibel taiy ‘ plembeey F aw nent payee dy Oa
Hat 5 a A YAAEYASAN Hi ER HT NRL AF le NTs EA ; ite csvnalybonnpraeeeNeie gh buN dt PRE LS PLA rg MEL
rae wsbeate BEIM Uae SEN AT LLG RL RUG Ait eg ODL beat t ta Hat ATA BANC a Ey &
i
ae
te
itd

|

0
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PORT COQUITLAM

OCT

MEMORANDUM

TO; Mre BURs Kirk DATE: October 3, 1985
Clty Administrator

FROM: We Brown
Dlrector of Communi ty Planning

SUBJECT: Development Permit Application
2648 Kingsway

seat tia

RECOMMENDATION: , That City Council adopt the following
Oo resolution;

Soe DN rare en ea,

WHEREAS the Permittas Wishes to commence a
development on the Lands hereln defined;

ee ete eo.

AND WHEREAS the Permittee has made
application for a Development Permit In
regard to-the Lands;

AND WHEREAS the Municipal Act R.S.B.C, 1979,
Ce 290 provides that In a Development Permit
certain matters may be varled or supplemented
In the manner specified thereln; . .

SLT TIT ec enn earn etre mene

NOW THEREFORE the Council of the. City hereby
Issues a Development Perm|+t In respect of ALL
AND SINGULAR that certain parcel of fang
situate [In Port Coquitiam, British Columbia,
which Is more Particularly deseribed as:

Lot 3, District Lot 379, Plan 8009,
New Westminster District, .

COMMENTS:

As City Counell wit! recall In the rezoning report about this
Proposal, reference was made to the Proposal using a
Development Permi¢ to vary the side yard and rear yard
requirement, The rationale for the reduction of thoge two
yards Is to Inerease the slze of the front yard so that the
bullding wit { be setback an equal distance ag neighbouring
buildings constructed under the M=| Industrial zoning
regulations. This modification was requested by the Planning

Department to maintain The visual setback appearance along
Kingsway.

FETT mS a sitet PO nae

In conclusion, support of this application Is recommended ag {+
Is viewed as an Improvement to the buliding's siting.

igi

NINE

A nt t

Hiss W et jaye
dateltuarw