August 12th, 1974 Plan on behalf of the City and affix the Corporate Seal thereto. Carried, Alderman Traboulay voted against the resolution. Plan.& Zon.Comm. From the Planning & Zoning Committee, August 7th, 1974, submitting proposed amend- ments-Zoning proposed amendments to the Zoning By-law tiat were adopted by the Committee By-law at its June 19th, 1974 meeting. Moved by Alderman Ranger: Seconded by Alderman Mahbett: That the "City of Port Coquitlam Zonin: By-law, 1969, No, 918" be amended by incorporating therein an addition to the requirement of "Usuable Open Space” in Apartment Zoning Areas (RMI and the definition of "Usuable Open Space" as set forth under Item 1 of a report from the Planning & Zoning Committee dated August 7th, 1974, Carried. Moved by Alderman Ranger: Seconded by Alderman Mabbett: That the "City of Port Coquitlam Zoning By-law, 1969, No. 918" he amended by incorporating therein changes on Building Setbacks in Commercial Zones (C & CS) as set forth under Item ? of a report from the Planning & Zoning Committee dated August 7th, 1974. Carried, Moved by Alderman Ranger: Seconded by Alderman Mabbett: That the "City of Port Coquitlam Zoning By-law, 1969, No. 918" be amended by incorporating therein an addition of Landscaping and Screening Requirements as set forth under Item 3 of a report from the Planning & Zon- ing Committee dated August 7th, 1974. Carried. Moved by Alderman Ranger: Seconded by Alderman Mabbett: That the “City of Port Coquitlam Zoning By-law, 1969, No. 918" be amended by incorporating therein changes on Sideyards in the RS-1 Zone as set forth under Item 4 of a report from the Planning & Zoning Committee dated August 7th, 1974. Carried. “loved by Alderman Ranger: Seconded by Alderman Mabbett: That the "City of Port Coquitlam Zoning By-law, 1969, No. 918" incorporate therein an amendment to regulate the minimum building size in Industrial (M) Zones as set forth under Item 5 of a report from the Planning and Zoning Committee dated August 7th, 1974. Prior to the question being called on the foregoing proposed resolution, a discussion ensued and Alderman Laking stated he felt that any changes