gee ~ RR ~[5i gj;...„P-'~inn&i%~ NISI ~ ~g IIIRR IIIWII~ (~ jg/~ .,A ++ h~ migig Fl ~.3g,,g(Ill.. ' &&": — i !9~% . ii~ i gjjg%'5lgll ', I ~liisiill I -mR-: = a msa ' 511%1 ai m Iah THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PORT COQUITLAM ENVIRONMENTAL PR~ON COMMITTEE Wednesday, May 8, 1991 Meeting Room ¹2 2580 Shaughnessy Street, Port Coquitlam, BC 5:00 p.m. AGENDA PERSONNEL IN ATI'ENDANCE: & KKhU: CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING ITEM II. RECYCLING COUNCIL OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Report from Deputy City Engineer dated April 30/91) XZEVU3L: RECYCLING PROGRAM - LEITER OF OBJECTION (Correspondence dated March 26, 1991 and report from Deputy City Engineer dated April 30/91) ITEM IV: HOME COMPOSTING (Report from Deputy City Engineer dated April 25/91) ITEM V: VANCOUVER BOARD OF TRADE - UPDATE (Report from Deputy City Engineer dated April 30/91) ee&F4 tK!i 1lriii res"-, j&&er S&ents~II&1le&L ' ~ I ram m ~ aeg sat '-:'=~j~~~i@miiis@l&5%lp --=-- 'I - -~ 's ggggeg m ' '— ~ r QI 4 I ': -: ~ ~IRllllttsK!IIIIaiiiii 'jinni.,'"'pJ ~ 'a u '"gia ~m ~ I R d I m I ~ " — —— ='--'=-'=- tss'&jlilLPgm!amass"! "!"~~@i!Ig — ~ ~ g I ajar lÃ~~RR S- IIIIRS~ 1IRIIIIIIIMam aaP1nmjt I i ~ is I = ~ II m a&1 116 I p 'inks ~&aPe~m~tj — ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECITON COMMII TEE AGENDA Cont'd,. ITEM VI: MINISTR'I OF ENVIRONMENT - FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE (Correspondence dated March 5, 1991 and report from Deputy City Engineer date April 12, 1991) XI'EM VII: THELMA MacADAM (Report from Deputy City Engineer dated April 30, 1991) ITEM VIII: NEW BUSINESS THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PORT COOUITLAM ENVIRONMIRKAL PR(yfECTION COMtVBTTEE MINUTES A meeting of the Environmental Protection Committee was held in the Second Floor Meeting Room, 2580 Shaughnessy Street, Port Coquitlam, on Wednesday, May 8, 1991 at 5:00 p.m. In attendance were: Alderman J. Keryluk, Chairman Alderman R. Talbot, Co-Chairman Kip Gaudry, Deputy City Engineer ITEM I: COI4FIRlvtATION OF 1VllNUTES The Minutes of the Envirotunentrd Protection Couunittee Meeting held Wednesday April 24, 1991 be considered, read, and adopted. Carried ITEM II RECYCLING COUNCIL OF BRITISH COLUMBIA The City of Port Coquitlam received correspondence from Jill Gillett of the Recycling Council of British Columbia expressing encouragement for the Port Coquitltun recycling project. Further the letter requested information as to the Port Coquitlam's Coordinator and telephone number. Correspondence was sent to Jill Gillett dated April 30, 1991 outlining Port Coquitlam's program and informing them of the Engineering Department's Recycling Coordinator Mr. Andrew de Boer and his telephone number. ITEhI El: RECYCLING PROGRAM LEI fER OF OEJECHQH — Committee considered a letter from Mr. Richard Schroeder of Poor Richard's Distributing Corporation expressing objection to some of the basics of the Port Coquitlrun recycling program. Committee felt it would be very worth while to invite the gentleman to one of the next Committee meetings to hear first hand his concerns regarding the rec„cling program. Mr. Schroeder will be invited to the May 29, 1991 Conuuittee meeting. 'yaeiif — a~i@I II'i&~*: Cont'd .../2 —: 5llltl+~@:"„— +"=WIW1RI'$$ -"-,,-,=,;==%5g~yjj'g~~~~)g ==.,",=aii g RI&llt'--mama" ~IRI@IR .='I-"-'''5 al&s'-!'!.'"::Nlffg i[)$ 115',Rsl ')FI ~ = p . tssiijjg~jlF , — .. —— I fl m san as& ''' ~%lstasalIIMlI -'Iiilg'Ia "ca~ '= -~ ~a@he'aii~~~~giaa~ as i&ma IB I]I 1lgg a, II'"""'-='=-— --" ~ "'"-".-" — gl!~ll~/t~la I se = = =. ILttattita&tau~~ IR I%I I= '-= RllhlIIIIFauaa " g g ggig==- t == ~ —.— — I+1~ san~a'!!l'.~msllgj f/I — ~ay~~ I lg~gg I sM %us i -2- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTON COMMI'I TEE MINUTES Cont*d... ITEM IV: HOME COMPOSTING Committee heard a verbal update from the Deputy City Engineer regarding the Home Composting Demonstration project recently approved by Councih Mr. Andrew de Boer is currently researching cost and availability of the various types of composters that will be purchased and placed in each of the two facilities. A full report and recommendation will be made back to this Conunittee prior to any expenditure being made. ITEM V: VANCOUVER BOARD OF TRADE UPDATE — At the April 24, 1991 meeting information was presented from the Vancouver Board of Trade requesting support for envirotunental issues. Committee considered the matter and asked for more information. Mr. John Hanson of the Vancouver Board of Trade was contacted on April 25, 1991 to discuss the various reconunendations. Mr. Benson reported that the initial information was meant to be a preliminary report and that further full detailed information was being sent that day from the Vancouver Board of Trade offices. This information was received May 8, 1991 and was not available for this meeting. The new information will be evaluated, sununarized and will be reported back to Committee. ITEltd VI: MINISTRV OF ENVIRO~ FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE — The Committee reviewed correspondence from the Ministry of Envirotunent dated March 5, 1991 to all Municipalities re-establishing the information regarding financial assistance with the Ministry of Environment for Municipal Solid Waste and Recycling programs. It was noted the City of Port Coquitlam's request for financial assistance towards the recycling program in the amount of $ 56,000 is indicated appropriately in the progratn documentation. The Engineering Department will continue to ensure any eligible programs are submitted to this Provincial program for funding considerations. lK'~, )~@~l Cont'd .../3 P!,!hii- !Ilsl»l 11 5%IJ gg llIRI ~! I ".',,.I& I! stuws sa»tust5! '"nac" =.iRL'--=-u "" "'" uu ~lllllghg " I'IIII'& !! (IIIVI& sttt i.:= . ~ lis= miit —:=.==== suuI8!Ih 1:. ' W „~'-=-'-:" "-':: "Klllll — ENVlRO~AL PR~ON COMM1TIKE MINUTES Cont'd... information requested was sent to Thelma MacAdatn April 25, 1991. Ms. MacAdam will be utvited to the May 22, 1991 meeting of the Environmental Protection Conunittee. 1TEM VIHt NEW BUSINESS: a) Cotttsminated Site Louaheed and Shauahnessv — Alderman Talbot requested a status report on the environmental clean up project on the Railway/Intra West lands at the comer of Shaughnessy and Lougheed. Deputy Engineer will obtain the information for next meeting. The Meeting Adjourned at 6:00 p.m. rA1'dylan J C.F. (Rtp) Gaudry, P. Deputy City Engineer Committ eryluk hainnan CFG:ck Minutes not read and adopted by the Committee until certified correct by the Committee Chairman's signature. cc: I I I''[! ss wl Isn a / [ ii~a ~!! 1 f1R. S II Mayor and Aldermen City Administrator I=; ~ t~gL%!IM~~//g~ &j&~ntrtuamltrtaasanN~ ~I lI /5IIttan 8~I~ Sil g ~ ".— —. '' ' —.-. Rig u ~a+ I aI san aac iiBRR uaa&t&t ssgll5 lRi! I~'~~+ '+~a" 'Ice I amer",IBI, gy t&& ~ g :: .':5! Wtglg tat~+ & ~ +, i-'g l Vl I ill 1 Q&Ii tss Iw I 'fI! au"" g,~sRII I g! ill ~ IIIII stggl~~ g,pig ala imai ac& I R~ i-, — — ~ SS IIILS & 5 II II% I ~ IR It a ~ a ~a — — I ' ~ ~ — --" ~" - 'n ~= =:g ~~a =: — ", &',, I I pal ~ I . - — — II 41! I RISal$ 1III Sl 'gga z~'.. ' 4+ i!/g/gIg 'i!ill ~ Sliia 9 """.'"~ I 8% H its ) s iSII lt t3 (S lR I S I Psaat m i I THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PORT COQUITLAM TO: Environmental Protection Committee FROM: Kip Gaudry, P. Eng., Deputy City Engineer SUB JECT: CORRESPONDENCE RESPONSE DATE: April 30, 1991 EECOMMENDATIONt That Chairman John Keryluk sign the attached letter. The attached letter was received from Recycling Council of British Columbia regarding recycling programs in Port Coquitlam. As it appears they have reaHy not been informed of the full extent of Port Coquitlam's Recycling Program, I am suggesting we send the attached letter which outlines the broad scope and scale of our program. Deputy City Engineer CFG:ch Attachment H hll i.an 8! Ij Ill%I ri&III 'Isa' Illa's&ip ig IKssr s 1st Pm& gq g ]I%i ji ~ !Be ai u,»aa lll t I a a Isllt! ~ 8!1 i ~ '! ',e l t ~it%saW II'll!I%he aasa~ I I II I an I I '!'! ====— " IJ) tti~t! aas ~~ aiMl~)! ~ II sa a 1ias~ —,jI!! ts a! II W ~ %! I — — —; ~ stg!Ã0!Enid!tg!a II ass iI 'I!1niiiiiggia sR =: g ~:..==-~'-'-~; =.=aiasam!% ~~!tt I!IIIII-""' -'=;" ~aa~i gtgt!teams, l Ilt t'~15/ I)i t latter~ ~~~tst!EwPRljg gg) "=~ i i s&!,!g g 2580 SHAUGHNESST STREET TELEPHONE; 34I.5411 PORT COOUITLAM, S.C. V3C EAS FAX: 464.3524 OUR FILE April 30, 1991 Recycling Council of British Columbia 102 - 1525 West 8th Avenue Vancouver, B.C. V6J 1T5 Attention: Jill Giliett RecycBng C ordinator Dear Ms. Gillett: RB: PORT C&3OUITLAM RECYCLING PROGRAM Further to your letter of February 27, 1991 we are pleased to advise that the City of Port Coquitlam has embarked on an ambitious recycling program which is due to kick off September I, 1991. We will be providing our residents with curb side pick up of recyclable materials. We will be utilizing the 'lue Bag" system where residents will place all recyclable materials in the same bag and place it at the curb side for our trucks to pick up. Initially our recycling program will service single family residences and in time we plan to bring on multi-frunily residences, industrial, commercial and institutional facilities as budgets and physical equipment petrnh. We would be pleased if you would provide your callers with the name of the City of Port Coquitlam recycling coordinator. He is Mr. Andrew de Boer of the Engineering Department and can be reached at 941-5411. Yours truly, Alderman J. Keryluk JK:ck cc: Mayor Traboulay Alderman Talbot Kip Gaudry, P. Eng., Deputy City Engineer gillSII) !Ijl~el IfiiiI 'llllll jII III / / Il(I-:=:~nssnI~g PW — ~ ~~'gg i!8'Iia,|lll~nlll'I && i~i'341)is+~,-:,:--"-'--'-..".,'..-jllil li:; '.~'-"-" —,"'~~==.=llew -=..——'.IIIIIII II'---, "'i".'-,'- . ~g IS~ '; ~ I~] - 8m-~~.i~ ~-=~m — Iim .-— ~=„-'~'gg'„1 =ESttl I @P * 2-'"-~-'-— - lal sllg~f j Ifjl a= „„'",'" i@I % tt..mllgIIIIIII~~ THE CORPORATION OP THE CITY OP PORT COQUITLAM MEMORANDUM Tol Environmental Protection Committee COPY: Kip Gaudry, P.Eng. Deputy Engineer FROM: Dsnielle Page Administration REl Attached Correspondence — Recycling DATE: March 6, 1991 His Worship Iiayor Traboulay has asked that this correspondence be referred to the Environme; tal Protection Committee for reply. I l"j~p, -,:; pg) ij Att. I Rl 385 g=;,S ~ Ii IIIII [g~slllgpss~ igm+Nm Q'ggpl~~m.. 'IISSIIS elle g::~lllll l,'gllllll~ gg' ~ ss — IIL Bill mIiilHRH IHiaejm~je! "" —.-~'giig ~Rcc cli~n Auncii uf Briiivia ('nlunxlllI lil2 Isle Wrvl mlt Avrnur, Vnnruuvrr, Ii ~ ('i 2 I'12c &iun 'l 7222 Feb. 27, 199l Len Traboulay Mayor City of Port Coquitlam 2580 Shaughnessy Port Coquitlam, B. C. V3C 2AS Dear Mr. Traboulaye Enclosed please find a copy of a letter received by the Recycling Council of British Columbia. The Recycling Council operates Provincial Recycling Hotline and the B.C. Waste Exchange. the Everyday we receive many calls from Port Coquitlam residents. Members of your community want accessible recycling facilities. Sincerely, Jill Gillett Recycling Coordinator. I IIII ~! I ~j IIIIIII ig I ~+~ 0 -- . —. — II j jif@IIE pp'—:jiiii Pal eel:,::;:u,", I 1 '' ' ms. „)III ~Him/IIII I ill I jjIj~ Igj j'I '1Iim II]~p'g&e ee ,'cull[i,:;+II! IIII~ i'!+II IIIIIII I .- - I ll " 1 I I 8 8=' "- "- ~ = "," — = -; I!! pgj eeIRII IJ/+$ 1~+~ — ;'II,'iIl sle --',I:." eye 1~1 P III lslmllllii ,II@Iveun 3I -'o ko c I':. t" nn ~h L «".«'n L) r . C)&'t L' ic:& I I I I &-.Q&:g& i I t (&t & 71 i ca v9i3 'I p~ ho~ f r~oy Cc&ric.c=rn v i rsarne i- ly I l'c&che I „ &c&nniricl I c&cr c&Irr&c . a- yenrs c )cl. 3 or~ very cor&c&=rhecl o bout c&rr& dry &rig +0 roc y c le wvlior&rwc &'l . We Eh&+cps Vhr ouglt c ut %he hc&use, but T. &c&v e no pl Qc e 0o tzu f bern. 'vJe cion' have Gnq r&-c'c ng +ac'i &fi es, c&ria w C1Orik have any "R." hect~, or %he blue boo cQlwctq'-t-cl up 9.hrowir&9 fons o&f renews pape, S Out. Could yot& please. find m&-ne vzay fo . I & I I I'& Sericl c=. I inc sorr e bags or G box ~ uou %d I be very grc-cital f you could po-.-i t I& I.~e.l p vvanC Ico h eip rrte wi kh 3 hI~ pr oblern I H4« ri virnr&m& r&f clc-o&i-&, 4, 5 +ho I k.eep Ar y oL&r +ice . i & I= — y G&.( THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PORT COQUITLAM TO: Environmental Protection Committee FROM: Kip Gaudry, P. Eng., Deputy City Engineer SUBJECT: RECVCIING PROGRAM - ~ DATE: April 30, 1991 OF OBIECIXON RECOMhdENDATION That Mr. Richard Schroeter of Poor Richard's Distributing Corporation be invited to one of the next EPC meetings to discuss his objection to the proposed Port Coquitlam Recycling Program. Mr. Schroeter wrote to Mayor and Council March 26, 1991 objecting to the proposed Recycling Program in Port Coquitlarn. Some of the facts he states in his letter are incorrect in particular as they pertain to industrial sites however, I feel it may be worth while for Committee to talk to this gentleman and provide hi,u with all the correct facts and answer any questions he may have. C.F. (Kip) Gaudry, P. Eng. Deputy City Engineer CFG:ck a I II II''II% l') ~ .'at:: s ~~ ~P W I a — 6 '„~ „"' an ear ~ '— I I I I a: ski = =.-- '" lib IS ]!PIP' s s I tW [aHlmgsa —: "'~~ jji'! ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ +!~~ ~ +t t +! g w~~~~ tSS unl n ~~~~~ s II IIIRIISC I! '.jj gill! I 5+[ gS llhai~iiii~ ~~ t.,,'5IBKlltgsbltgttl4)RPS Il an~Pf( g/fPg -a»t!1+~'! .r a ill ssallaatnu;ut;~a'' '',-'m s IIII/g — — - lllhgg&I~F(.'"n !"'-"-!Ws!E'„," i ,arasg uw un W == i~jt I ~ ~I I~a ls5gggg . ~j~~ a+)/ ~gyes I! / Pg!ggg g~!"tLli5ggta =~~,",'maaiaiswalll'gglR~!&~&1(I Imlg~ggg~ ~lilstn[ g ' g~ @gg[g I I ~ lass@ 0//iCe Of the Plfrrifjr — THECITYOFPORTCOQUITLAM Shar:sy 2580 Street, Port Coquttiam. S.C. V3C 2A8 Fax: 464-3524 Phone: 941.5411 April 3, l 991 Mr. Richard Schroeder Poor Richard's Distributing Corp. 2820 Huntington Place Port Coquitlam, British Columbia V3C 4T3 Dear Mr. Schroeder: Thank you for your letter of March 26, 1991 regarding proposed recycling sites for Industrial Sites. I have referred your letter to the Environmental Protection Committee. The Chairman is Alderman J.J. Keryluk. I am sure you will hear from the conunittee ir. due course. Yours sincerely, I Mayor L.M. Traboulay cc: Alderman J.J. Keryluk Alderman R.N. Talbot Mr. Kip Gaudry, Dep. City Engineer I I'«%5 Rslasm Ih«m sij IIITI5 Isa! Sm,=lsssmwl+~ I —~aatml14 la Distributing Carp. Marrch 26th, 1991 Mayoa and Councr'X, CLty orr'o& 2272 McALLl6tea Avenue Poet CoquLtlam, H.C. Corr~ V3C 2A8 Re: Pnopo6ed RecycLrng Ser4vlce 0orL Porrt CoquiXGm Indu6trvr'at SLte6 neighborL o0 oua6 ha4 made me, aroarre that therre L6 a prropoAed RecycLLng Prrogrram under. dL6cu66Lon, that urould Aee boxe6 oa bln6 coLLected (rrom Indu6Lrvr'rrL SLCe6 such art ouru. rrre oron a AmaLL muLti-Lerrant type uraaehou6e, at the 6LCe ort Lhe A old Huntington K4'LL. Ne uroutd Lthe Lo voice oun. objection Lo LhL6 .rdea, ba6ed on Lhe /rbLLorolng Jreadond 4 1/ IL L4 not prracttaaL. Indu4trvr'aJ. u6err6 arre alaeady dLrrecttng rrecoverrabLe roa6te thrrough palvate $ 4'irm6 that elthea pay (on. &he 60Lvage, oa hauL Lt at no chrvrge to Zhe bu4lne467 2/ Hou6ehoLd roa64e, such a4 bottLe4, paperr6, can6, etc., L4 not u6uatty L4 at hou6ehoLd67 prre4ent at InddALr6UrL Alte4, a6 lt 3/ Oun. bu6lne66 rocuLd nOL u6e LhL6 62AVLCe. rrre, Lthe Otherr bu6lne64e6, have aLaeady made oun. ourn arrrrangement6 Lo Aemove rte-cyclabLe6; 4/ We donrt Ltke having a Aeavlce that ure don'L roan', ./rorrced upon u6 ough automcvmc a66e64ment. I onLy hervrd og LhL6 pnopo6al by accident. I hope. Lt L4 not too Late to have my 0 pi ru'.on con6lderred, St ncerLety, Rlchaad SchaoederL ope4ation. P.S.... My compLr'ment4 Lo the CLty'6 Gaabage Trruclz Lr'me4. Lhelic pleb-up rrratch and can rtet you». by you oh, i They do a gaerLt RS/jmL 2620 HUNTINOTON PLACE, PORT COr3UrTLAM, B,C., CANADA V3C 4T3 4 PHONE: (604) 464-4544 THE CORPORATION OF CITY OF PORT COQUITLAM MEMORANDUM TO: Bryan Kuk City Adnmustrator FROM: Kip Gaudry, P. Eng., Deputy City Engineer SUBJECT: HOME COMPOSTING DEMONSTRATION Pmtection Committee Meeting Apn1 24, 1991) DATE: April 25, 1991 PROJECI'Environmental I~IRC — MMENDATIONt That $ 1,500 be approved from the recycling budget to set up kIome Composting Demonstration Projects at both the Art Knapp's Plantland Store and the David Hunter Garden Centre. BACKGROUND dt COMMENTS: Over the past six months the Environmental Protection Committee has researched Home Compostir!g and how it assists in the recycling effort in any community. The Committee found that various levels of assistance and encouragement could be provided by the City to its residence with corresponding costs. Fox example, a full program where the City purchases Home Composters and then re-sells them to residence and participates in demonstration projects would require a yearly budget of approximately $ 40,000. On the other end of the scale a project with minimal participation by the City with a small financial contribution to provide demonstration projects located at garden centres in the City will cost approximately $ 1,500. Our research and statistics show that Home Composting is one of the most effective recycling tools available with almost immediate pay back. Home Composting has the potential to remove 20%-30% (by weight) of household garbage. However, the Corrunittee fully recognizes the budget restraints and therefore is only requesting a very small demonstration project to keep the Home Composting program alive. The Committee proposes the City purchase and install four or five different models of Home Composters at the Art Knapp's Plantland and David Hunter Garden Center facilities. Each Garden Centre would display the Home Composters in an actual working environment along with a two foot by three foot sign indicating the City's participation in the project. In addition we would include information about the demonstration projects in our news letter to be inserted with the 1991 Tax Notices and any subsequent recycling advertising or literature. C.F. (Kip) Gaudry, P. Eng. Deputy City Engineer CFG:ck SSIMIRIR g!! I aiaehl'l".lii! Ii 0 I!t Ilailst kl, sa ' I 1 I m ~ ~1m —:~ — -~hlall% 'a I I R u ~taaat M =--:=!J i H i — t! IM: ~ ~ ~gg~u~usu ~ m IM a ~! Is~~ ~ a%El ' I;";===a Rill THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PORT COQUITLAM MEMORANDUM TO: Environmental Protection Committee FROM: Kip Gaudry, P. Eng., Deputy City Engineer SUB JECT: VANCOUVER BOARD OF TRADE - UPDATE DATE: April 30, 1991 RF~MMBNDATIQN For Information. 5hgKGROUN~D COMMBNTSt At the April 24, 1991 meeting, information was presented I'rom the Vancouver Board of Trade requesting support for environmental issues. Committee considered the matter and asked for more information. Mr. John Benson of the Vancouver Board of Trade was contacted on April 25, 1991 to discuss the various recommendations. Mr. EIanson reported that the initial report was meant to only be a preliminary report and that further full detailed information was being sent that day from the Vancouver Board of Trade offices to the various municipalities. This information packaged with contained details on all the recommendations. He asked that we review it first prior to coming back to him with any additional questions we may have. To date this information has not been received but as soon as it has it will be summarized and presented to Committee. ~mplmim lii I ~ ~ Lt eputy Ctty Engineer I Ilii11 II I CFG:ck tie% Ig iIRtmil~ [I gil ~ ~4 ~: -:='~~I~ RIIt',iggm 4144s ~ I ~Is '4 till I!mrna i mimaa&~ a a tw ~ 44:: %4 I lm 4 I ~ -— ''4 in ,". p; I ~ I I I i 1 %5% & / g, i4i~4444 - - — IlI — ~ ~455'~== .~R IIII ~ % CORPORATION OF OF PORT COQU1TLAM MEMORANDUM Environmental Protection Committee DATE: April 12, 1991 Kip Gaudry, P. Eng., Deputy City Engineer CT: VANCOUVER BOARD OF TRADE REQUESTED SUPPORT FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES RECORDATION Committee recommend to Council Council support the initiatives of the Vancouver Board of Trade namely: - Mandatory motor vehicles emmision testing. The use of cleaner burning fuels. — The development of public transit systems together with means to use transit. - The establishment of a Air Quality Management Board similar to that established in Los Angeles. — GROUND & COMMENTS ancouver Board of Trade through their environmental task force, undertook a study on air ions in the Lower Mainland. The report established that air quality in the low mainland been diminishing over the past few years because sheer growth has overwhelmed ogical advances and emmision reductions from industry. One of the largest contributors is tomobile and therefore any environmental initiative that can limit exhaust emmisions encourage transit will benefit the air quality in the Lower Mainland. Vancouver Board of Trade also recognizes that the present fragmented system of ctions in the management are various aspects of air quality in the Lower Mainland is not ctive as it should be. They have studied the Air Quality Management Board in Los s and believe that an agency along those lines should be established in the Lower and. They have written to Council requesting support for their initiative to the Ministry of Environment, the Honorable Cliff Surwois. I have summarized the conclusions I feel appropriate should you tvish to recommend it to Council, g! Its ~ u~ C.F. (Kip) Gaudry, P. Eng. Deputy City Engineer 5!'ii teal )IlllllIll)$ 5+II s 1 I g I I i CFG:ck 991 rd Traboulay tion of the City of Port Coquitlam nessy Street 1am, B.C. Traboulay: of The Vancouver Board of Trade I am forward to you the attached paper ndustrial Emission Reductions in the and. focuses on the point sour e tpaper also discusses the overall trends in lity. This trend is a distressing onc ot halted, will result in very serious of the air quality over the next few largest contributor to air pollution is icle exhaust. The Board supports motor vehicles emission testing, the use burning fuels and the development of .sit systems, together wi'th means to use level The Board also recognizes that teroffragmented system of jurisdictions in is not various aspects of air quality e as it. should be. We have studied the management board in Los Angeles and we an agency along those lines should. be for the Lower Mainland. t'e s Environment Task Force, under p of Larry Bell, is currently developing outline of an organization and the f legislation to establish such an will be submitting this shortly to the Cliff Serwa, Minister of Environment, nsideration. We would appreciate your rector G t'I t tl'ltt.tttl tt'.t t:'ttt.'ttttttttttt P. If Il It tl tttt it'l ~ --': ETFt0009 g — gal%~ I~m Q ~ —:=: ~iiilm5! I Ma~mssss salaams' ~ ~atm I Is m' 9 tt I ———— '."," ,''.M E'. '' H5s ~ s ..mi ttsttss :.mrna msr ISttt~~ r %5 ' tt I S&- == I ~ IS&IIII We'll II ~~asset,t ~tel January 1991 INDUSTRIAL EMISSION REDUCTIONS IN THE LOWER MAIM.AND Preface I. Introduction II. Forest Industry Pollution Control Trends in the Forest Products Industry Opportunities for Cogeneration III.. Oil Refineries Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) (ljl Oxides of Sulphur (SOx) IV. Cement Industries Particulates Oxides of Nitrogen (NOx) Oxides of Sulphur (SOx) Opportunities for Resource Recovery V. Utility Industry B.C. Hydro Burrard Thermal Generating Station VI. Conclusion IIII'mii" i ill lsitttillll Iaeii~@~~ tIeI u (Stn aefe I'eeNeelg ,I e Rane IIlignttl Sgete eemaa 45 The quality of our air in the Lower Mainland region does not meet Federal Standards. We have had historic patterns of air quality shifted from the reductions, and then subsequent improvements, controls on our and as emission appeared natural gas use of coal to vehicles. However, 1988 data indicates that these improvements have already been oveiwhelmed by growth, and we are once again in the unenviable stage of deteriorating air quality. as'e While industrial processes contributed directly to only 7% of total emissions in 1985, we wanted to gain an understanding of what progress has been made over the past five years. In our judgement there has been a 30% decline in total emissions from these top industrial sources, with the clear prospect for a similar decline over the next five years. We'have reached these conclusions through personal interviews and site visits.to the top ten locations, with the exception of one company that could not fully participate since they were focusing primarily on land based issues. We are confident that the 1990 Gresier Vancouver Regional District emission inventory study, to be available in 1992, will verify these conclusions. The continuing inctease in population and resultant vehicular traffic represents a very significant challenge, as we attempt to balance growth with environmental quality. L.I. (Lany) Bell Chairman Environmental Task Force Vancouver Board of Trad. Introduction I. A number of recent technical investigations and Task Force reports have focused on a major concern for the air quality of the City'f Vancouver and the Lower Fraser Valley. Investigations have indicated that pollutant emissions on a per-capita basis ekceed even those of Los Angeles, which has the most serious air quality problem in North America (figure I). L.M. and L.A. per Capita Emissions (kg/day) VOC CO NOa 604 PM I 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 ILnwar Mainland 0.2 ~ 04 0.6 06 LA Air Basin Of more importance, is that in the Los Angeles basin, air quality is now improving, whereas in the Lower Mainland, unless some significant changes are made, it will continue to deteriorate. It is estimated that at the present rate of change, the air quality in the lower Fraser Valley will be worse than that of the Los Angeles basin by 1998. The Lower Mainland air quality is affected by emissions of five primary pollutants: carbon. monoxide (CO), nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulphur oxides (SOx), particulates (TSP), and volatile organic compounds (VOC). The Greater Vancouver Regional District's (GVRD) "Lower Mainland Emission Inventory" for 1985 provided a detailed breakdown of air emission sources of the Regional District and the Fraser Valley to Chilliwack. This report identiTied motor vehicles as the principal source of emissions, accounting for 90% of the CO, 82% of the particulates, 64% of the NOx, and 53% of the VOCs. The vehicle issue is of such importance that the Provincial Government has initiated a mandatory vehicle emission inspection and maintenance program which will begin operations in early 1992, to ensure that automobile pollution control equipment is working efficiently. .The primary pollutants may react with each other to produce a variety of secondary pollutants of which the most important is ozone. This complex reaction involves sunlight, NOx, VOC a'nd to some extent CO. It is. this photochemical smog which most detracts from the aesthetic values and environmental health of. the Lower Mainland (ftgure 2). With the emphasis placed on estimating vehicle emissions, there has been little public II'=,:==-~~ I~El %III ~~ H SII Im ™ll, ': - I.. attention given to the efforts of the major industries found within the Lower Mainland in reducing their industrial point source emissions. These industrial complexes have been working for a number of years on p'ollution reduction opportunities from all discharges to air, land, and water, however our interest in this report is particularly directed to improving air quality. A number of the industrial programs have been underway for some time, aud although some are required by regulation, others have been undertaken on a voluntary basis as new technology and other innovative measures become available. This report describes some of the success of these air emission reduction programs. au'anagement Once'rimary pollutants have entered the atmosphere, they are influenced by many topographical, nieteorological, and chemical. factors. They accumulate most readily under calm, dty weather conditions. . 'rourz LOWER FRASEFI VALLEY AIR BASIN Mean ulind droctions and ozone concenlrsllon isopleths (ppoI during seplemoer 1, 1988 eir polfulan e p Issuee PI%If sYnzslnaaanaz I +~I Bassa amgtal I II. Forest Industry Pollution Control Trends in the Forest Products Industrv Forest products industries such as sawmills, plywood plants and lumber remanufacturing facilities have a long history of operation in the Lower Mainland. Air emissions from this industrial sector have historically been generated from the burning of hog fuel (ba'rk and sawdust wastes) in both open teepee type burners in the early days and more recently in hog fuel fired boilers. Plywood veneer driers and wood dust extraction systems such as cyclones are other examples of point source emissions from this mdustry. Since ihe early 1970's air emissions from lumber manufacturing facilities in the Lower Mainland have been regulated by the GVBD. Stack emissions must meet increasingly strict requirements for plume opacity and particulate emissions and the industty anticipates more stringent air pollution control requirements for VOC's, NOx and CO„ in the future. Pollution control devices such as bag houses have been used for many years throughout the industry for dust control. Increasingly sophisticated pollution abatement devices such as electrostatic precipitators are becoming more common as Lower Mainland air emission standards increase. Combustion of hog'uel continues to provide a relatively inexpensive source of heat energy for the kiln drying of lumber at some operations, however, natural gas and electricity are rapidly replacing hog fuel for this application. With the increasing trend for mills to convert lumber drying operations to alternate energy sources, many hog fuel boilers in the Lower Mainland have been shut down and this trend will continue in the future. The. end . Pll~g) ~ ) I ml 5 5 I w%% H ' 1 I I I I!i I $ (]) asm a aasa i1 Nl ~ If ~ a~)(~~=-m f....',&Mllg~~m g result has been an ongoing reduction in point source air emissions from the forest products industry within the greater Vancouver area. Incineration of wood wastes today as in the past is essential to minimize the unnecessary disposal of. these materials in Lower Mainland landfills. In addition, sawdust and wood chips are used for pulp and hog fuel provides 'a'relatively inexpensive local alternative to oil for power generation. Wood wastes from the sawmill industry ate transported by barge to coastal pulp mills for use in hog fired power boilers. As noted in the following section, the forest products industry is exploring new initiatives for the cogeneration of electricity from wood wastes. The high eAiciency boilers and state of the art pollution control devices required by these facilities will further reduce air emissions resulting from hog fuel combustion. The trend through the 1970's then has been for the reduction of hog fired boilers and incinerators in the Lower Mainland area and the increased utilization of wood wastes at the coastal pulp mills for power generation. As a result of the shift in hog fuel consumption and the increasingly tighter GVRD pollution control requirements, the air emissions from this industrial sector have been dramatically reduced and will continue to be reduced in the future. Onnortttnities for Cogeneration Cogeneration of electdcity from wood waste is a way of obtaining needed electrical gerierating capacity while at the same time benefiting'the environment by both eliminating a source of leachates and particulates; and as well delays the requirement to develop new hydro-electric facilities. The Ministry of Forests Mill Residue Task Force co "British Colum Residues for C This recen production, uti in the Lower M the Chilliwack The data Sub-Region Production'tilizatio CHILLIWACK 'dARK (BDT)l OTHER (m'SVVE) 2 2,392,500 450,300 1,535,800 892,200 l Oone DIV Tonnes 2 Cubic Mense Solid avood Scauiuolenl We anticipate two wood waste fuelled cogeneration facilities could be completed within a thme year time horizon vvhich will draw most of their suppiy from surpluses presently available in the CFD. Electrical Energv Prodlat HSP&P 700 GW.h/yr. FCC '89 GW.h/yr.. . - - The propo Howe Sound Pu firmed; and Fle presently under Peak requir Volumetric 'Un~i cubic me Solid Wood 400,000 /yr. approx: 8 85,600 /yr. approx. I It is clear that, should both of these projects materialize, a large percentage of the apparent surplus in the CFD may be productively utilized. IIIIIWII I) 4IIII!!I I II W I Ill!II jtII 'l I IIIII II ~ "— I a llHII NI ,IIII III =Ig !ljgj ni ~ : . "l sl s a -:: :~satpmtk.-'sas '"'-" '" ': 8'"- !IR'a ll I!II III l l l ' -'- a~o stIas aaa a Ia llil =''-u ! ~[ s alud ~ ~ ai 1 ~ nI 1 al I i aal " alai alm I'olla l ~iti ji itll!III „„... II III ~usimaa~ar g I'IIgPlttrmttwL' 6 aI~I nsltiii'.'',l I I ~ 'iillII /il llllnl I III all I !I I as I I Sl ~ 11 lJIIII ii Si16 ea,. qadi I% 5' ~ PAVE ~ SSS II ' I M 'll ITS lm II lgl'llew'IVII g 1%PI Ill N Ili~ — — li i:::, I 15i l)alii —,. ~ii =.~nil = 15)~k gf ~';„'j I Jl'i xiii ill 5-- I',I.i ~ ,')I I I ~I ilail Il]/ si i:iaaii il ll($ I i ~ RK ' ~ I 111 I - ~K ~ IHF. — — JP — — — - I ~ INC::: ~:-' I.l III'Il lj—.,VII 1M& ~i la, Ia 1 i ~ i s iSI Ii I l l Sllll 8 NOx in the combustion gases. reduce emissions of VOC's include instaUation of secondary seals between the floating roof and the walls of the tanks on crude oil storage tanks, and installation of secondary seals on floating rool'anks containing gasoline. Other methods being used to reduce emissions are: IIII III) IIII *. Changing pump shaft seals from the packed type to mechanical type. ~ Replacement of reciprocating gas compressors with centrifugal compressors. awra II ~ Oxides of Sulohttr fSOxl Oxides of sulphur (SOx) are generated as a result of combustion of fuel containing sulphur., The main method used to reduce these emissions is to remove the sulphur compounds from the process gases prior to use as fuel in the process heaters. Desutphurized natural gas is used as a secondary fuel and as well, the choice of emergency fuel has been changed to the use of diesel fuel which is lower in sulphur content than 'the fuel oil previously used. Changing tank mixer shaft seals from packing to mechanical type. ie il ' ~!ivm lilt I'i& ll I Illa' Ljl I l I I ILlll'3~~ rt II 1a a I 11 LI II I J la 9 -6- j ,Ii leap g P 114 I l i 1 Itttl jets a ts ~ I ttltI,&I . ) s[ altj ttIittttta;-„--= --.— -1II " " ilail ltII III I ijII II/)g j'gisr.—::"" ' — " Ituglas II QPI andri Ia,atm ul S,J S Centent Industries IV. Particulates Oxides of Nitroeeu (NOx) The manufacture of Portland cement can be classified as a traditional "heavy industry". Unlike, for example, an oil refinery, the raw materials and the finished product are solid substances. The unit processes in a cement plant are materials handling, crushing, grinding, milling and pyroprocessing. As a t:suit, the control of particulate emissions is an integral part of the design and 'operation of a modem cement plant. In a cement plant, NOx emissions originate in the rotary kiln. Finely milled rock is fed to the kiln and converted to clinker, an intermediate product in the manufacturing process, through a series of chemical reactions. Fuels used in'he kilns in the Lower Mainland include natural gas, coal and fuel oil. So-called waste fuels such as landfill gas, scrap .vehicle tires and coal tailings ar'e also being used. Because a high temperature (about 1400'C) is necessary for the formation of clinker, oxides of nitrogen or NOx will always be created as a by-product of combustion. The amoum of NGx formed can be reduced by good operating controls. For example, a modem cement plant will have sophisticated instrumentatior. and a computeriz d control system to assist the operator to maintain optimum combustion 'and stable kiln operation. Since the amount of NOx produced is proportional to fuel consumption, modem kilns equipped with pc«heaters or precalciners, which reduce specific fuel consumption, produce less NOx per tonne of product than older kilns. Baghouse or fabric filter dust collectors are widely used in cement plants wherever material is uansferred or conveyed, and in the grinding and milling systems. For example, at Tilbury 'Cement Limited in Delta, over fifty baghouse dust collectors are in use throughout the plant. Baghouse dust collectors have been in use in the cement and other industries for many years and, with regular maintenance, give excellent service. In recent years, the performance has been further improved by the use of high-tech fabrics for bag construction and the use of micro-processor controls for bag 'cleaning. Many years ago, the main exhaust stack of a cement kiln'would have been de-dusted only by a knock-out chamber or peihaps a Oxides of Sulohur (SOx) cyclone dust collector. Today all kilns are fitted with either a baghouse dust collector or an electrostatic precipitator. Both types of equipment can achieve high particulate removal efficiencies with discharge particulate levels well under GVRD limits. The two cement plants in the Lower Mainland region have'recognized the importance of reducing the emissions of sulphur dioxide and in tlus regard have made a. number of significant process changes. This work has resulted in sulphur dioxide emissions, based. on actual stack emission tests, being ieduced by approximately 90% over the five years. ~f,Wlgih I g ij/IIIIIIi%I «IJ.. lgiiiIi'j' 113 III't =-~ JiiR IiiFIt ««~«, ~ II,, „,, i+ IIIiiIML,.:: «s«tl &gp'if~jiiiii'i'il II)IIIII «i t I ~ III I — illa $ $ I '' ~ SJ«IIII ill& « ' al IIS««attil '%8 iiiSII«RS- 5 — st', '-' jgg'g/fiIP~ — - — -.—.—,"+'jllN ~ IVIII It'«« I Lllllll III 5lil S R)',I 'past RI llil lj JNI'll5 iII ~ - ~ tt ~ 'I tlI--I IIII IS ~ ' i,lpga ill I if Niili Iil, Lf IINIj 1 ] N/%llil IWI I I Sl IM ~ I NS 1% M III '' 'I IIIIN $ ' I«I I II J S III I IN ll i I I I I 54 ll,"f R ISIIIIWe — . i'll/I IB IK; „, g I«g p ii ia«J «it I«IWII I««J50« il I%IIII Wl — Ouuortunities for use in Resource Recover v The cement manufacturing process uses flame temperature in excess of 2000'C in rotiuy kilns to convert a pulverized mixture of raw materials into an intermediate product called clinker, which in turn is finely ground with about 5% gypsum to produce cement. Sustained high temperatures,'he long residence time of hot gases and turbulence in the cement kiln ensure efficient waste Norway, they found no detectable emissions resulting from burning PCB's. This is consistent with test burns done in Canada, where test results showed destruction levels of at least 99.999976%. The cement kilns'can be used effectively to safely destmy all combustible municipal wastes. With the separation processes related.to recycling eliminating reusable materials, ii is now even more beneficial'to bum the 46% destruction. The cement kiln's gas scrubbing action and trapping of ash in the clinker provide added environmental benefits. . combustible'aterials. Extensive testing in Europe has demonstrated the effectiveness of cement kilns in destroying wastes, and in a recent test in Not only does it reduce the amount going to landfiH, but it also provides a'ore effective way of eliminating toxic or hazardous wastes and reduces the amount of "new" fuel, in the form of natural gas, coal or fuel oil, that would otherwise be required. illi51II IIIiiii t'ai" jisi'gill II IIII jI 'l im',Il'IjI.'I 1 ~ Fe I i I aa e 111 les tt s II i $ , tt ll~ ~ ~ .??»??a??s?aa?»???? II II! ~::: ~: . " i — asaateeaa= -- ~enac-„- Is ieSI a aa? ~ ?aHRm ~ aa»Rrtee%13mgga I?'Isrmra Rf? 'aa ti ~ ~ 'itiuiat I i " ';emlUleiia —" . ~i ~ ' ".sl te»a! ei!I'lmlr'"?ge- ?sI Elnls I I I'il llllllli — '? a I Ietijj II I lijj I mi e i e e wl!nn e ' :: ic"-- 11 !1 ~ = a? e a a? i I m = I Ill l l'ill s — . ' &gllsaii ie Ill »??II —:—: nil li,'-'- ?a' as = -"= ' ss 'i ? ~ a ti I 'i V. Utility Industry B.C. Hvdro Bnrrard Thermal Generatina Station Burrard Thermal is located on the north shore of Burrard Inlet about 17km east of Vancouver. This electrical generating facility burns natural gas to produce steam to six generatois that when fully loaded produce 912 megawatts of power. Tins is enough energy io supply electricity to half a million homes each year. voluntarily subscribed to more restrictive emission standard than originally prepared by the GVRD. Burrard would also curtail its operation whenever the'air quality index is predicted to exceed 50 for five or more continuous hours. This occurs, on average, about nine days per year. B.C. Hydro is committed to impmving the air quality in the Lower Mainland and has consistently worked to achieve or surpass both the Federal Standards and those imposed by the Greater Vancouver Regional Disuict in relation to the Burrard Thermal Generating Station. These measures have positioned Burrard Thermal as one of the cleanest thermal power plants in North America. A recent inventory of all airborne emissions in the Lower Maudand found that Burrard Thermal, opemting at full capacity with an unlimited year-round supply of natural gas fuel, would emit less than 4% of the total nitrogen oxide and less than 0.01% of re'active hydrocarbons, Burrard operations have been considerably below this maximum annual capacity. For example, B.C. Hydro has decreased Burrard Thermal air emissions through improved operational methods by 40% and has 'I ieSmI St Plllll I IIItll , IIIII ' Ihlllli ~mm. m I I! lect I ~el " - -=ill III illltlL'te —,s.=. II e aS i ~ eII elele'g Ieee .',, 'BslsuNWIIIRI I Il g~~~a eanml (jill I,'e'-- IIeI I! litt!i == el ta 'si ~ . -- 4t t g ie ittISijj j!tt: . aef'lilt! 'ralleu ~ ! " mej w i'%/ -9- Lj eeeee i~t ~ I""-"" mi e etttliIIW":'' ~ . i S R~,~ —..&ii e~(g aM%i =,: ~ I I I I I'c.: .. — = . ed% I I ~ seel mm -- —::== Il eee e II li=;;;,"„ ~ilII4l l~a~illll, f]g [g$ ~~~~~~WI~ ~ ~ « ~ K tee DATE: April 12, 1991 nicipalities on March 5, 1991 re-establishing the from the Ministry of Environment for municipal dl note in the attachment that the City of Port owards the recycling program in the amount of any approvals. You wiB also note that the project ing a blue bag system. We are following this t. C.F. (Ktp) Gaudry, P. Deputy City Engineer jyIla'IIIIW i IIIII I% sll uisls H ! =:..: ms as Igsii'' I I I I Isa III 11 ~ aI sas I ~'msas I ~ ~ I I I % I ~ JIB Province of British Columbia arliamanl Buildings victoria Bnllsh Columtea Ministry of Environment VSV TX4 OFFICE OF THE MINISTER March 5, 1991 His Worship Mayor Len Traboulay City of Port Coquitlam 2580 Shaughnessy Street Port Coguitlam, British Columbia V3C 2AB Dear Mayor Traboulay: The Province of British Columbia has undertaken a municip with the objective of solid waste management strategy stream 50 percent per waste reducing the municipal solid provision of financial The 2000. capita by the year aimed at assisting local assistance for various programs waste is an governments in reducing their municipal solid strategy. of this implementation the in important component from the Province's Financial assistance is available number of Municipal Solid for a Fund. Environment Sustainable include: those Waste Financial Assistance Program. Thesesolid waste municipal of relating to the development other source and box blue of implementation management plans; litter volunteer progzamsf separated recycling and composting programs; education and information control projects; public and, for the transportation rural waste management programs; of collected recyclable materials to market. strategy The success of the municipal solid waste management for markets viable depends upon the creation of economically recycling community collected by the recyclable materials Enterprise Initiatives Program programs. The Solid Waste (SWEIP) provides financial assistance to private of enterprises that entrepreneurs for the establishmentcontribute toward that end. or materials recyclable reprocess to your Program information has previously been forwarded final enclosed the replaced by be now to is Thf.s attention. program guidelines. GUIDE TO SOLID WASTE Enclosed please f ind the MAPPLIClQITS February PROGRAMS" MANAGEMENT PINANCIAL ASSISTANCE on: inforslation program 1991, which includes ,III IK1II jll fIII I Ill%I )I I IVIII! II y IIIIi 'I'fag lKIIII„ I'f'lflII 0 2x Re«y«lep Pape ~i~ =,'— Sff~~lffPtser ftSaIIIIil ffftSSttf ~1 rfa pllfflmsfffmlfSltSB — == ISIIII/ Iell~afftsftrffta " "''1-''~fIIIRtsfft I Ii -"=Eas ="''ff IIjjlj jlggIj ~ — ~ —— — I ~ — ~ wiI g[lpf fflll'EIIf Mfa~ QjIt -~a sl ~I Jljlcs&siiem» The S Assist are el contzi prepaz maximu Distri ss s~ ~ ~Sl ~ I capita 50 per areas for the next District and each of the incorporated formula reflects funding The $ 10,000 in planning costs. District Regional whole the from waste generation population. Assistance The Multi-Material Recyclimg Pinancial s.n the assist Program (MMRPAP) . In order to Plans, Regional implementation of Solid Waste Management w).th the approval of Districts or other organizations, be eligible foz cost-share the Regional District, may towards start-up and Province the contributions from zecycling programs. multi-material of costs capS.tal initial promotion to of Maximum funding is: 50 percent to 1/3 of total household; up a maximum of $ .50 per operations; composting or sort).ng for equipment of. costs household initiating for and, up to 1/3 the capital cost collection programs. The Rural Waste Management Pinancialoz Assistance other Program (RWMPAP) . RegS.onal DistrictsRegional District the organizations acting )ointly with to upgrade assistance financ)al May be eligible for in rural areas. Maximum solid waste management practices ($ 30,000 liml.t) funding is 50 percent of cap).tal cost establishing and landfl.lls towards phas).ng out old limit) towards transfer stations; 50 percent ($ 10,000 percent ($ 5000 limit) and, 50 closing out illegal sites; good white and hulk auto towards direct costs of sites. rural from collection Pinancial The Recyclable Goods Transportation Districts or Reg).onal (RGTPAP). Program Assistance Regional the with other organ).zations actingfor]ointly assistance financial District may be eligible costs associated with to cover up to 50 percent of transporting collected recyclable goods to market from remote areas. Program The Litter Control Pinancial Assi.stance support financial provide will (I.CPAP). This program based groups in assist community to encourage and clean-up programs. reduction and creating litter .../3 The Public Information and Education Financial Assistance Pxogram (PEIPAP) . This program will provide funding to eligible applicants for educational programs which promote the Municipal Solid Waste strategy. It should be noted that grants and contributions can be awarded based only on approved budget appropriations. Along with the new "Applicant's Guide to Solid Waste Management Financial Assistance Programs" February 1991, please find enclosed the finalized program guidelines for the Solid Waste Enterprise Initiative Financial Assistance Pxogram (SWEIP) January 1991. The SWEIP program provides financial assistance in the form of low-interest loans and loan guarantees to private entrepreneurs for the establishment of enterprises that reprocess recyclable materials or contribute toward that end. Also enclosed is a summary report generated by the Municipal Solid and Biomedical Waste Branch for all program applications received in this office to date. Subsequent reports are available upon request. Due to the confidential nature of SWEIP business applications, no public information is available on applications received for this program. In addition to the above program information, an update of the handout describing the provincial Municipal Solid and Biomedical Waste Strategy entitled "Program for Participation" (January 1991), a "BC Strategy" brochure and a "How to Avoid Taking Out the Garbage" brochure have been enclosed for your information. Additional copies of this material are available upon request. Please contact Ms. Leslie Sullivan, Manager, Marketing and Enterprise Development, Municipal Solid and Biomedical Waste Branch, Ministry of Environment, 1312 Blanshard Street, Victoria, British Columbia, VBV 1X5, telephone 356-9971, if you require any additional information. ~ gÃfi Sincerely, Cliff Serwa Minister 1%11 fa Enclosures RLesa jl"K=- i~iaa&515iir i-==== iNW&@&~c= i'~'NN'1 )))ieiHrFng le~' N N NSI.'jllln I'~mes '= ~~ernie.....kl)si,i- ... I%15 I+~I g~ p~IA ) /g// g ~g~~ gg~ g~g/ =-=== — III~S Ill~is ig~a ~ — aasaea ~~~II&w all I Sh)+g ggfpy ))g llglp —.==-'='-'l-'-''--'"------,'~'.l&sih~~egal IIII ~ Liaiki-.~,-:m;;=-, -,—. == aei~ &tel ~&&~ M — Cl 'At I C 0 0 K 0 Cl Cl 0 FIII jjj Ni 0 II%I jl IILI1I 0 7 0 0 I0 II%II 07 1 II1i 'Hl I II I ~ 0 IQ !0 8 00 0 ' a I O '0 ~ I QO O 0I O MM ,jmll jjjl OO '0 ,IIII I 0 t I ~ Ig I I III 0 I%III ~ I lie« IPI II !I IRI 0 jj jjw I I IIe OO I-I M OO 0 0 Cl 0 I N!! I I I I 0 NO Ic Z I0 I0 I jjl I II« CC I 1'/81ILI IIIIIlllf IijiiIi 'IeR'lie jjj"" IIII'Jlj' " II ~ IRK,! ,I g1 Ill jili, liti Q ~ I 0 CM ~ I 441 I le 'I le jljil ji IIII —— ~ I I IIR=, . ~ I ".I I'li rriale I I t I I 'I+ 'I 'I 1 I j I II I It l „'';, lm 7 I ='i = l I&Ill;',," ~II II ICN CNCa a,.::::— i il&he@lUJ'=- II ~ I gO 0 Ia 0 0 IL X ll OO 0 U O M M OC M I PM ID 11 'LP 00 0 0 0 N 0 0 N NO yN M 0 o1 M M II 0 '0 II 0 Ol al II 0 0 D ID 0 '0 N Ll 0 0 0 ~ LI II I ~ 1 r 1$ IP I I I I I I II : ."III IL I I ~ ~ ~ I ~ I 'I I ~ ~ IIII II R I fl I ~ ~ I''I i%SIR f5 I IH IS $ 00 IO ID I S I 0 II11 F I 1 I I / I III Il,:„„ I 0 rt 0 W U 0 0 W 0 0 D S I CI 0 I IS milli'8'illli, I,'ll nc M M 0 I 0 P &ISiii&'il III% I III S II 0 0 II I Imiil lg n N 0 M0 N 1lisl tllif SO I ~ I x0 IIIII III II 0 0 0W 0 0 0 0 0 W 0 00 W I U 0 I S U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO &R ' S IIII I I I ~ I SSS S T 3!l,l,l IU ~ 0 Hl I llhl) W 1 IO 1 ilIII 0 0 0 0 O I II II 0 0 U 0 o 0 I W I ISI1+ I U 0 I0 0 e Ie I III D I f'(kJNIJ I II 11I O'I ll I l'1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ea"isa i i, litlIi I W j lii'I I i I I'" ~ i W 0 4'11 W 0 0 0 0 0 D I ~ I i ID 11 II I ' »I I I'' II IISDO I ,'1 ~ Ii s I I, .- I I ilm I 0 0 0 0 0 00 .' II IIL I Os ~ 0 I ll &1»,; II=— 5 — ' ' I I~ kg»l IISI I I ' 0 ~ I ~ I I I Il I P ''il li' I "QQQQ 0 0 O A 0 00 B C I iii Cl Q CI Q I O I g Q 0 0 o i) $ U ) ) C O nC t C P O 0P n a n P Y n I n n P n n P P UI Ch 0 e Q n. t' Cl n n n n M n I e P 0 0 0 Q P t' e n C CI iQ P P P e 3 U n. n n I P O 0 g 3: 0IrJ n n e n h 1l g Is 'c 'C n p n el n 'Al C I $ $ CJ h n U g I C O n 0 0 0 0 e P A O 0 al IU S Q «Ie «I 'C 'C 'C Y P n n 0 n o 'n C ll 0 O -I 0 :C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 C e M n O It P '0 V A 0 Q 0 hj '0 3't 0th 'U0 0 n 0 e e n P It 8 n g n e h! I Cl h D e 3 hD le h 0 C n Cl e P n n, oMI-I atCjM P «I n Q A D Y n h s «I 3 e n ht e C D e a nl I h Cl n nt O. 'n 'n z D « e 0 0 Ij U Q P 0 lgR ajIIIaaI1 M Cl 0 gCI ca CA Cj M M Cj Cj cs ta Cl 0 R ll n n Q h e t! D n 1st n n h le 0, n 3 0 C n, Q ~IVQ» e I I I I C * Q F h h O Dl n n Ql ID e h he C n gl 8 L I h e D n n D I O «I Q elis * 'n 8'0 n 0 O -'j 0 I 1-:-: ioo 0 M o o o o a I M I I 0 o 0 I D 0 0 0 0 «0 0 U 0 D H 0 0 0 0 I Cj M U 'In 0 D0 0 o 0 0 M 1st 0 M C" Ch M 0: cj a« al th 0 0 0 al I ~ I LII I I: . l ii i i 6 0 U' 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 U I 0 0 0 e Iil II /jl'1 I a a 0 o 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 O II I l0 0 0 D U I0 0 0 0 0 0 a I O e C R I.= I I II i a iI M 0 o 0 D o 0 i I LlJ ; 30113 - ~ ..., 0 II CS p ~ II 11 . II I I 00 Cl 0 33 0..—— caco A all%I Is I '1111, : I I 115 II IS IIs 01~ IP Sate I ~ C. I 'l Q'— ~~ Al, I I Rl I Y II I— ' 3 ~ ~UIs i I ! QQQQ 4 « tl N Q)QQ Q sIIj 0 Q QWQ 4 0C g Nd Id O ol Q Q t ~ Q 0 0 0 'a 0 'P la ~ 4 V M Ie 0 0 U 0 0 M X 0 0 0I N 0 I g O Q 'C 0 O K q p O 4 N * Y f 0 a 0 O O 0 'e 0 g 5 I 0 ee P o o 0O 0 I C e 4 C 4 C C C C C P o o 0 0V 4 Q 0 e '0 0 4 0 U 0 0 5'C 4 4 N I o p C o I n 'C n o Q 8 o 0 O 4 e N ( Q Q I I n n 0 o Id C Ol C o 4 o K O g C 0 0 n 'C I 'I 0 Cl n n I rn 0 n 0 4 4 0 Q P 4 o eIL O I 4 C P n lf n lf YO' 'C C n 0 C o Ul L a 0n N P DQ 04 Id C 4 0 K n F 4 I Q O 4 P Ol al a 4 8' I C C tr IL od n I 0 0n e n P gl 'O e n I W 04 0 4 Y n IL 00 0 0 C I P'l P Q N C 4 I C I ' ld 4 Of 0 I n e Pcn 0 n Q g '0 t o O 0 Cl L P )Ill I 4 n C Q 4 '4 P o I I I%.%f1(. 4P 0 o 4 U 4 o o I 04 44P I (ii milli I)! Q fl e YnQ U Q Q ~ M M 0X HO e ol o ltl co C n e 0 0 o 0 ao Ol 0 '0 0 v. IO 0 M z 0 00 D 4 I Ld It O o %$ 1I, I U U IO ! (II)ICPII O'WCII 0 "iiiiii! IQ m'll 0 !'IL;he,m eg I!! ol ~ P II' '' 'sllI Ia. 111 Of M H H I SK; 8 0 IO 00 04 e g~wii ii$ Jg QI 4 a N I n n4 0 d I 0 0 0 M N N 0M 0 M M 0 D 0 0 O C 0 M 0 I 0 4 0 0 00 0 0 4 W I U' e N W d 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 04 0W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i!I D U' M C0 fo 0 ,- (t 0 O D 0 0 M C P II I SQIilg 0 0 0 D0 0 0 O C O 0 Io O W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D O U D 11 IS 1IKI '1I III C ! 0 U e U K!I, II I I f 0 D I '. 0= . I ~III I I II ', N=''=.:Sl F f'I -". gilI I': d 1 111 I L nf 8 l LJ 111 I1 II 0 4 L ~~ I ~ I I PI 'Cd ~ 8 n n g 4 4 4 0A 8I 8 8 C A g Ig 8g np 0 K 40 DS t 4 4 C C a n Cl n U D 'C 0 A U 0 'U U 0 0 N C 4P 4P Pl Dl 4 4 n P e c n D 'U D '0 4 C n U U A 0 4D. D a g '0 A A n '0p '0 0 U 0 0 e a 0 tl C Cl g IP A P C P 0 a n a n U n 0 U 0 0 * P 0 c P n c 0 X n Set n P a la IU I 0 'I 0 0 0 c 0 «I fc e c O n n I U n n P 0 n 4 a 0 n 'I Y P e 0 c 'c c 0 eI Y «I n n «I 4 Nl p n c n n S P 0 4 'e «I P 'cIP I n 0 0 I 0 «I tl n P Cl n K 0 e 'C Cl P Y 0 3 tl Pl 0 n 0 I I il I P n K tl Cl n n Y 4 Cl U 4 0 0 0 0 n n a n « *P ct g $ a n c n N K M P 0 0 C HO 0 0 0 0 Dl tn le 4 a 0 FL n n IN ~ CD ~ I O 00 I t t I 0 0 0 5/I )IRIIIII 0 I net I 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 C D O I W U la 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 N 0 I ff OO OC I I [gl kSSMI I I I-I H Oa HH ,Ill PPii II Ii IIII IF g lm I5I11t I I O '0 Z IU 0 II tn O SI 4 ID «I P ll Y A 0 0 U 'U A A 'I M 0 «I a 4 ~ Ill g 'g 0 Y Y U III tl A n U 'U l D 9 0 I n Cl IHRkTSII A '0 0 P x0 0 A P A 0 Y n N C p n g U c n p C W U 0 I P O g U n U K 0 P Lt' c 0 I 0N 0 D Pl 0U n U \ 0 UI '0 n 0 0I M P 'o A U' 0 N U N I 0 P 0 I 0 0 0 C I O P W 0P I t N e coH l I 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 00 00 0 e e~ I I 0 II 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 Pl ~ P I I O 0 0 N 0 I~ .:= * It Ii I I I Ill I '' I'8' ill' o 0 0 0 o o o o 0 0 a 0 0 0 o 0 0 I I SJ IIII I lhsa i sli I i 'I I 'I la tJ ~ I ' -gP1 II R 4 I ' la I SPI Ic ~ ~ t .. Ii,, llln ". I I fa J S 'l /'t lit I'iI PPI Pl ~ ~ ~ I L I at 'J I ~ I It .Nt 0 Nh l- 0 1 - 'Jl lit ll —.:: Il I ~ I l/I U I I ~ J D la Isis Iilsltll 1 0 g l 0 0 '0 '5 P 0 nl Y QQDQ0 0 K I D 0 0 04 0 Dl 0 I I K 0 '0 '4 N g, 0 n 0 0 » I 0 0 '0 I I 0 g OI Ul II 0 g 0't I gH g C I 2 nl 0 I g 0 0 0 4I N FR» 00 0 0n 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 D 0 0 0 4 00 D 00 I 0 "0 '0 0 n N p 0 n g '0 ll 0 0 Y 0 p Pl N 4 0 0 '0 0I HH 0 P0 Zl0 0 Zl nl 0 'll 0 I Ia 0 '0 '0 nl 04 I 5 ll a a a 0 ~ ln M Ia '0 Ia sD 0 4l 0 '0 IN-— 0 nl I 0 0 1 0 M M OG 0 IO as ]iNIIR Ol Is C giill I I 0 M M 0 MIn S 0 O 4 0 I I I M 0 IS IR I » 0 0 0 I PB 8 K '4 ]I ISsae as lq I I .Jill ~ is ~ IIII Is i I 0 0 0 0 0 II I I 'O PS S 00 0 0 I I 0 Q D ls\ ~S I II' '=;=. = 4 IS , 0 I D O U 0 '/~[ll,fbi&0 I 0 II ~ ~ I / 0 ~ ~ ~ a I/ss pan' ~ I I ~ I I I I I IS'Sll ~IS I/ -;: ~ ! %In'] IIS~ I ~ 00 4 IS ~,S I I I I I III 1 . ~ Slf I I 4 la ~ I I ~ I ,,nl I l iL., ~ I ~ Isslns', I II ": = » I ~ »I .'..' .' Rl S Il ~ I IS S = = ',a — - .— UII SR II al 5 I I I I I ''. I 'SSISII' l ~, !i I ~ 0 0 ,~ II a Il SS " :-II 0 I IS ~ I I I Ill ~ I 0 1I '0 0 '0 0 4 I Q. v 0 0 O n 0 Pe 0 o 0 V I le I V iR 0 0 '0 H n 0 Rl C' le IR 0 O RR et nIt 0 0 0 n 0 0 4 4 el tl 11 et 0 0 0 0 0 I IR 4 0 I! 0 0 n 0 n 0 0 et '0 '0 0 0 V M 0 le N 'I 0 l n 0 0 Jl 0 Ie 1 0 I 0 0 fit V 0 v et V 4 0 tl '0 V I 0 o 0 n o 0 V V tl 0 V 0 e I 0 I I 00 0 la!pe ra ~ llliiii,~ is, 5 IR 444 5'4 Kl I !«t Ilm I !jig// I ~ I ~ ' IhciaRRJRRRlhl ' I IR4 IM" I III g I lee ' RRei ' R II%1$ f%5 — —: I 'IRtI iR f -! % 5 3 I IC I PINIIII!TIRRRKa=':54 ~ ~ i I'RIII . lee II ~ 0 let --RI ~ I I '~ ~ I ~ etl Jilt I ---===== -'-"F-'' =" '---==== el ee il II hl I » II FFI II It. t I n, '44'.:N,'— cl I e I/ 'll le r I I ' I ~ I ~ I I ' I I RRI liii ii Rl'I el el, RRWSIRL ~ i I — ~ I tl RR 'll .BI ."I [tl' I ~ 151 I ~ Tt .'' .. ~ . II ~ ~ tt 4. I .'," .'-,'-.'!i e' I Ik i 0 I aeel - ,.'' —c J tlt i i::: e,ti I ~ , Il. 1 4 IRRI . — —:04 I i I IR4 IIIR ~IIl 0 IRI'Iiiti~;---- ~ ele ~ ll II ~ ~~ Rwlttla] (I I '8 4 1411 ll g g~~eiat imi i--I I — '- ! ~ '. RO ee I lilt 4 eeet l 4 I I 4 4RI I KE1'O FXNANCIATP ASSZSTANCE PROGRAM STATVS Program inquiry. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 9. Application recei ved. Preliminary review of application by Marketing 4 Enteiprise Development Officer. Preliminary review of application by Marketing 4 Enterprise Development Officer and Reduction, Recycling 4 Treatment Secti on. Request for documentation. Documentation recei ved. Review of complete application by Marketing & Enterprise De v el opmen t Of fi car . Review of complete application by Marketing s Enterprise Development Officer and Reduction, Recycling 4 Treatment Section. 9. Wot approved by the Municipal Branch. Solid 4 Biomedical Waste 10. Approved by the Municipal Solid 4 Biomedical Waste Branchl. ll . Spending authority requested. l2. l 3. Spending authority approved. Spendi ng authority re jected. Z4. Application rejected. l 5. Awaiting letter of certification. l 6. Letter of certificatior. received. 1 7. 16! i i !f !) 1%4411 14~ I'I IP 11 'IPII III I ~ ~ 14 ~ 4 WIP g 4I II/ I I ~ 1444 :...„; ''"'l 4 I ill 41! , I II I I I I 4 ll141Ill I I III!IIII!I 44 1PIPP 1 iiilIf !gal I '~l lPPL. l~ » II jll O'I 8'Pill gljaii iil I 4 saaR R I IAm '— I ll EMIWK ~ II I!Pm II 1111 4ll a I 1~ g gg il I 11 I 4 I .'a'4IIm!ig,yiic: — 'u m44 Pm ap444 ~ il 111 l: —4 m I 'I I1 44 Ifl 4 I 11 —.— ~a'IRRjt wi pl ~4= 11 l g F41 4'g g I/I I ~ ~ 4 I " w 11441 'I Pg I II I ~ II 1' - -IIIII'= 4 I IPI l 1 4 — ~ Pi%a ~ 4 N4PI Na.. l: ll '14' I 14! I -35EjiH'4 $ Complete. I II II P: PI ~ Rill!II II Ngjg" 441 4I ~e414441 ~ am4' "- =- ~ ~ m1a1 THE CORPORATION OF THE ClTY OF PORT COQUITLAM TO: Environmental Protection Committee FROM: Kip Gaudry, P. Eng., DATE: April 30, 1991 Deputy City Engineer SUB JECT: Thelma MscAdsm Envimnmentai Issues — RECOMMENDATION For Information. The information requested by Committee to be forwarded to Thelma MacAdam was done so on April 30, 1991. I spoke with Mrs. MacAdam and she is extremely interested in coming to one of our next EPC meetings to provide us with information on the Coquitlgm Water Shed and other environmental issues of our area. She was pleased to hear of the active nature of the Environmental Protection Committee and wished the Commiuee well in its efforts. ll C,F, (Ktp) Gaudry, P. Deputy City Engineer CFG:ck ill ~~ ~~ g4~ '5 IIJIIIN a&esllRR l585 ml11 8 1 11%i5ii ! ,hglllRH 111% IIIII ltgiiiiiia llllmtg,d g il ~ ~ I I [ ' ., III iL me %SR Vttssm 'i ti'xiii Ill u gl isgp'-'-'-'' il so== l..!t"'I )I'll ~i'$ w( ~ --~ lg" .,~(~,„~ ~ Jl I I 'ss»mamma att's,' ' — -- — P iames assi' 2560 SHAUGHNESSY STREET TELEPHONE: 64 I -54 I PORT COQUITLAM, 8 C. V3C EAS OUR FILE April 25, 1991 Thelma Mac Adam 3695 Victoria Drive Port Coquitlam, B.C. V3C 3V4 Dear Ms. McAdam RF ENVIRONAL ISSUES Further to our con rersation I have enclosed some of the information regarding Environmental issues recently dealt with at the Environmental Protection Committee. The Conunittee would be interested in meeting with you to hear your thoughts on the information provided and any other issues. Perhaps after you have had an opportunity to review the information you could call me to arrange for your attendance at one of our next Environmental Protection Committee meetings. CFG:ck cc: John Keryluk, Chairman of EPC Alderman Ron Talbot Igor. Zahynacz, City Engineer I FAX: 464 3624 C.F. (Kip) Gaudry, P. Eng., Deputy City Enghteer FERGUS CREEK FISH KILL TECHNICAL INFORMATION Prepared By Lee Nikl Water Quality Biologist DEPARTMENT OF MEW FISHERIES AND OCEANS WESTMINSTER, B.C. and Milan Kupr Fishery Officer DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES AND OCEANS DISTRICT 2 r SURREY SUBDISTRICT V3H 5PS Attention: Dear Hr. Herb Redekopp Fisherv Officer Sire: Re& Coouitlam Intake — Water Suoolv to Fish Hutcher~ I)i)% have for reply your letter of February 12, 1991, suggesting that the matter of supplying the POCO Hunting and Fishing Club Hatchery vith vater from our system should receive further consideration. This District agrees that enhancement of the salmonid resources of the Coquitlam River is a most desirable objective. Hovewer, we are uncomfortable vith any scheme that requires the District to voluntarily increase our risk of exposure to Me liability for inadvertent release of chlorinated vater, ln your letter, you state that if such a supply is provided, charges vill not be brought against this District in the event that interruption of supply for operational reasons causes the death of fish in the hatchety. This satisfactorily covers the case of flov stoppag but fails to address our concern over the possibility that chlorinated vater could back up into the hatchery supply vith disastrous results, as has happened in the past. While it is possible to set out operational procedures to minimize the possibility of this occurring in future, some degree of risk vill alvays be present. IIIl iilyl J I l5 4 IUI I Ii&llà , Me understand from your letter that the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO) is unable to offer this District immunity from prosecution that vould cover the accidental release of chlorinated water to the hatcherv. The District must therefore insist that, at a minimum, both DFO and the F(!CO Club acknovledge in vriting that they are aware that there is a potential risk of such an event happening in spite of this District's best efforts to prevent it. IIIIIIii I&m m&a llm m ls! I gal P N (P(i "!Ilaw l k m l 'I ) &I SS I& lli Ii Hl J w As well, ve require confirmation that both groups realize that disinfection of the vater supply by injection of chloramine near Coquitlam Dam vithin the next fev years is one element of the District's water quality improvement plan and that such a change would preclude the supply of raw vater to the hatchery vhere it is presently located. I g&I I 1 I RLI I I I I I I I ll! I Ill I. ~ 'I' ' ini I II~i i 'i ~...,-,,:, I I ''-" ii 'I ii IIII = 'l I 4i I VJ'Hl I i aN 'ia am l I .,1 I I II l i lj Ill ~)i II II li lllllii — '',%~ — I ..;;: =..-~ tnt'%S'iT='5" 4 l )'e''JD".70i i%i-'.".'a- L~~'fig[ RMlfW~M+ I ~ g i 11 &Xmiiaa ~ I I ('l g . e ~ ~ -& i I i I 'n i j'i g iii ~~ —: II lI,. I I I ~' ' I PI I ~i f-l-, 'ggg7lf i,[(WFqZ ~,+.,! Wmm'frrr::",V~ i'.'! lI,'r:;m~S Irr~emr ~m ~'la"&i~~~+~ ~ l~,!TFiiP.77%VI.%$8PTTT~i -7.'~i 5 I III II ~ gig( ia ~ I I I ia~in-; IC I, II I'I ~ I 11 I li,~::~ AGENDA PERSONNEL IN ATTF392~CE illll I! N III II I il I /ga Dl Ql jap a ill'II, XZg5U: 'III NHII RECYCLING COUNCIL OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (Report from Deputy City Engineer dated April 30/91) III Rl 5@lhjgl frill% F' att g tl 1 I I I RECYCLING PROGRAM - LEITER OF OB JECTION (Correspondence dated March 26, 1991 and report from Deputy City Engineer dated April 30/91) Il~'. ".'", I I CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING is gaia j lji'in 8IJ& Issue ~ ~ae ~ I II I I ' i I 'N l I I I LXGKLK: HOME COMPOSTING (Report from Deputy City Engineer dated April 25/91) %MY: VANCOUVER BOARD OF TRADE - UPDATE (Report from Deputy City Engineer dated April 30/91) I f I:,"I ih s I I ~ 14 Ii g iill11 „*;.-.== ~yIdia iiillg~ Iliiiiiiii iii Pl II 1&lig S ~ Ih lh I /1 a VIdi I d 4 1! ll /( I i1 l + 5 l ' i i I IINII & fgll '' I II I ~ I I 11 II I Jl I ~ 111 I Al ldllE '+ I ~ .: .:: II// ..-- [ [~d III I IIll I ~ W ~ d1 a rldl ~