je eee ae en EDITORIAL Fight Mac’s attack on labor The Macdonald royal commission report has some obvious poisoned barbs. It aims to subordi- nate Canada to the policies of U.S. imperialism and to further the neo-conservative goals of the Mulroney federal government. In this way it hopes to save capitalism from its internal crises. Not least, the clear intent is to do it all on the backs of the working class and its allies in strug- gle. With the Macdonald report, the right-wing policies of the Tories, and the solutions to capital- ism’s crises by the former Liberal cabinet minister and his crowd, are obviously betrothed. They are as one in their attempts to dismantle the “welfare state” which was the boast of earlier govern- ments. They are as one in their readiness to sacri- fice Canadian industry at the altar of free trade. They are coupled in their eagerness to sell out Canadian sovereignty and independence to the U.S. military-industrial complex. The Communist Party of Canada, in The Road Ahead, the main report adopted at its April 1985 convention, notes that a number of monop- oly interests in Canada are supporting free trade “in an effort to get themselves out of the crisis. They see no perspective for Canada other than the U.S. market and are prepared in return to subordinate the interests of Canada to active support for U.S. foreign policies. This, despite the fact that historically U.S. imperialism is in a state of decline. (Canadian) Monopoly however, is not united in. . the struggle over the direction Canada should take — toward complete subordination to U.S. imperialism or the path of Canadian independence...(That struggle) is likely to sharpen in the days ahead and become a major political issue.” _ That is exactly what is happening. While the Macdonald report is not formally government policy, in many places it dovetails precisely with the most reactionary Tory posi- tions. It takes the neo-conservative line, putting the goals of the private sector — and certain of the monopolies —above the well-being of the majority. Certain direct lessons can be learned from the report. Why, for exmaple, does the Macdonald commission select 6.5 per cent unemployment as the ideal, supposing that the system were capable of providing full employment? (The socialist sys- tem in the USSR did so, and has known genuine full employment for 50 years.) The report is cold-bloodedly frank. This is the “natural” level, given today’s capitalist circum- stances, because, balanced against inflation and fluctuating interest rates, 6.5 per cent jobless would neither increase nor decrease inflation. Today’s real unemployment level, 10.4 per cent (which the commission admits fails to count an army of discouraged job seekers) is explained, it says, by “cyclical factors” — in fact, relative over-production, the inability of workers as a whole to buy back what they have produced. So the 6.5 per cent jobless level desired by Macdonald and company is not just some figure they think is the best capitalism can do for the working people; it is the balancing point which — for the moment — best suits the sys- tem. It’s the coldest admission yet that the system rigs mass unemployment to suit its needs. Now, new layoffs are planning to accommodate free trade. That alone would be reason enough, but there are many others, why decisive action is needed by labor to oppose Mulroney’s neo-conservative policies. Macdonald’s assault on living standards and sovereignty, and the dead end outlook of a system which is anti-working class by nature. REAGAN SLAPS WRISTS , BoTHA DOESNT TRIBUNE Editor — SEAN GRIFFIN Assistant Editor — DAN KEETON Graphics — ANGELA KENYON Published weekly at 2681 East Hastings Stre Vancouver, BC VSK 125 Phone (604) 251-1186 Subscription Rate Canada Foreign — $14 one year, $8 six months $20 one year Second class mail registration number 1560 Business & Circulation Manager — DONALDA VIAUD I: the spirit of international friendship that continues to provide a welcome antidote to the poison of Reagan’s cold- People and Issues guising his products as something they aren’t. So much for “consumer choice.” According to Kistler, a shipload of war rhetoric, municipalities in Canada and the United States have in growing numbers declared their support for the people of Nicaragua by forming close ties With their counterparts through sister-city relationships. The latest effort, we're pleased to report, comes from the B.C. Village of Alert Bay. In an Aug. 9 letter Mayor Gil Popovich advised Armando Quiroz Pena, head of the town of San Juan del Sur, of the decision by Alert Bay’s five-member council to Seek the twinning arrangement. “This resolution symbolizes the wish of the people of our town to promote peace, understanding, respect for the sovereignty of the Nicaraguan government, and to enhance our respective economic progress through occasional exchange of ideas and mutual assistance wherever possible,” Popovich wrote. The mayor pointed out that the twinning proposal is consistent with Canadian foreign policy, which (pursues) an amicable diplomatic rela- tionship with the Republic of Nicaragua.” Alert Bay, on an island off the northern tip of Vancouver Island, has fishing and’ tourism as its economic mainstays. Many of its approximately 1,400 residents are Native Indians. 2 Noting that Alert Bay is a municipality free from armed conflicts and other threats from foreign jurisdictions,” the mayor went on to “wish you well in your Struggle to reach your goals of peace, Social justice, and economic staiblity.”” The village has been involved in efforts to aid Nicaragua. Recently a group of ishermen donated the proceeds from a fish sale to buy equipment for Nicaraguan fishermen, according to a receptionist at the municipal hall. The official also said the village of San Juan del Sur has replied to the council initiative. But for the time being, the con- tent of the reply is unknown. The Nicaraguan letter is in Spanish. Popovich, possibly the only Alert Bay res- ident who understands the language, was out fishing at press time. , daieate:, He, J Wie: obstacles there may be in the formal government policies in Ottawa, it seems that small bridges to peace and international understanding are being built, one by one, at many levels of Canadian society. It was to build such bridges that Ques- nel mayor Mike Pearce decided last year to send letters out urging municipalities to set up exchanges with cities in the Soviet Union through twinning. And it was also to build bridges with people in the Soviet Union that Ken O’Kennedy of the North Shore Rotary Club decided to go to North Vancouver schools and gather together 200 childrens’ drawings to send to the USSR in an international exchange. This week, Canadians will have an opportunity to see the Soviet side of that exchange as some 200 paintings and draw- ings by Soviet children go on display at Park Royal Shopping Centre Sept. 16 to 21. The mall will also be the scene of a small celebration on the Saturday, Sept. 21 as Soviet ambassador Alexei Rodionov will be presenting awards to the Canadian child- ren whose art was specially honred when the display was in the Soviet Union. Oe ver the years, as the movement against apartheid has pressed govern- ments at both the federal and provincial level to take action to block the import and sale of South African products, the official response — epitomized by Socred Consumer Affairs Minister Jim Hewitt — has been that the “consumers should be the ones” to make the final choice as to whether or not to buy the product. It’s a familiar line, of course — which provides a neat free-enterprise pretext for inaction while helping to ensure that companies like Sainsbury Ltd., the national company that distributes Paarl wines, continues to make profits. But lately — much to Hewitt’s chagrin, no doubt — consumers have been mak- ing the choice and increasingly it has been to shun products which they know to be from South Africa. And that apparently has prompted some new manoeuvres from the purveyors of apartheid goods. There is, of course, the case of one supermarket chain which routinely puts unmarked South African oranges in the bin with oranges from other countries, leaving consumers with no choice — unless they give up eating oranges alto- gether. But as Washington State activist Elmer Kistler tells us, an importer in Seattle has thrown away any subtlety and is just dis- South African apple juice was brought into the port of Seattle and the cargo offloaded into a nearby warehouse. There, the importer’s employees stripped off the labels and replaced them with new ones which read: Tree Top Apple Juice. Worse, the label stated: “‘Made from Washington apples.” We don’t know if anything like that is going on in this country but the incident highlights the points made around the world: policy on apartheid is not some- thing to be made on the business pretext of “consumer choice.” It’s time the federal government moved to impose economic sanctions against South Africa and the provincial government followed the lead of other provinces which have banned South African wines and liquors from liquor store shelves. * * * ccording to his son Paul, he was up and roaming about the hospital cor- ridors 36 hours after his operation — no doubt pondering economics statistics — but his many friends were rather more anxious when Trade Union Research Bureau director and Tribune economics columnist Emil Bjarnason had to go in for emergency surgery Sept. 3 to head off the future possibility of a stroke. The operation was completed success-_ fully — for want of a more technical explanation, it consists of “reaming out” ]} an artery — and Emil was back at home — to recuperate last Wednesday. And true to form, he was expecting to be back at work next week. PACIFIC TRIBUNE, SEPTEMBER 18, 1985 ¢ 3