THE CORPORATION OP TBE CITY OP PORT

CO@~

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION COMMTITEE

Wedrresday, April 13, 1994

Meeting Room No. 2
2580 Shaughnessy Street, Port Coquitlam, BC
5:00 p.m.

PERSONNEL IN ATTEND!~%

CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING

~M:
I~TE

II:

TELEPFIONE BOOK RBCYCL1NG - B.C. TEL

SEABOARD ADVERTISING/GVRD - TRANSIT SHELTER COMPANY

ITEM III:

PROTECTED AREAS STRATEGY - AREAS OF INTEREST

ITEM IV:

PINBCONE LAKE - BURKE MOUNTAIN STUDY AREA - LOGGED AREA

ITEM V:

WASTE MANAGEMENT AMENDME¹ ACT 1993 (BILL 26)

ITEM Vit

PROPOSED ADVERTISEMENT - RECEPTACLE LIMIT

I I'EM VII:

B.F.I. DONATION OF EARTH DAY - PROPOSED TREE

ITEM VIII: OTHER B USINESS

P~G

THB CORPORATION OF'THB CITY OF PORT CGQUITLAM

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTBCIION COMMIITBE

A meeting of the Environmental Protection Committee was held at City Hall, 2580 Shaughnessy
Street, Port Coquitlam, on Wednesday, April 13, 1994 at 5:00 p.m. in Meeting Room ¹2.
In attendance were:

Councillor M. Gates, Chairman
CouncBIor R. Talbot, Co-Chairman
LE. Yip, P. Eng., Deputy City Engineer
F. Cheung, P. Eng., Project Engineer
C. Deakin, Engineering Secretary

~d

The minutes for the March 30, 1994 Committee meeting were considered, read and adopted.

ITEM I

TELEPHONE BOOK RBCYCLING

Committee reviewed a memorandum from the Project Technician informing Committee that
B.C. Tel is offering to set up bins at three locations in Port Coquitlam so residents can drop-off
vvhite and yellow pages. Committee agreed to have the City Engineer coordinate the tluee
locations with B.C. Tel and then have a repon brcught forward to Council identif'ying the three

locations for information.

ITEM H:

SEABOARD ADVERTISING

Committee agreed with recommendation from th.. Project Technician to support, through
donation of municipal ad space, all Transit Shelter Campaigns except phone book recycling
(B.C, Tel is taking care of it).

XONE:

PROTIKTBD AREAS STRATEGY ARFAS OF INIXRBST
—

Committee received this package for information. Engineering Depanment to forward
information package to other members of Council for their comments, if any.

ITEhl IVI

151
II@I

—

This information was brought to Committee as requested. Deputy Engineer to bring back
original three options plus colored map to Committee so they can determine the correct borders.
Check with City Clerk for original Council resolution.

il

II,III

PINECONB LAKE - BURKE MOUNTAlN SITIDY LOGGED AREAS

I

III'

~V:

WASTE MANAGEMENT

~MENT ACT BILL 26
—

Committee received this item for information. Comm I ttee will review all parts in the future
when last part is received.
Ilail l

ua II I In W

i~aNIII

Rll)ll

Cont'd .../2

APR13 Sg
/gal l/,

..;-,==;,::,
'-

g ~ai!!!t|N1|NNN&'-'-"—

~

'5 Si %4

Ns@s

.l,!Niimffm slelilmm': &
g

',Nil

I ill lip& &&g

l1!mLlfl

lmlIW!'

- -P&
I@a,l«,1I

!

I

ITEM VI:

PROPOSED ADVERTISEMENT - RECEPTACLE LIMIT

Conunittee reviewed the draft ideas for the advertisement on Receptacle Limits in Port
Coquitlam. Committee suggested that the current bylaw and the 3 R's be added to the
advertisement.

ITEM VII:

BXL DONATION FOR EARTH DAY TREE PLANTING
—

Councillor Gates would like a re-inspection of the tree planting ideas for the industrial park. He
feels there are not enough trees and would like to see more Evergreen trees planted. Project
Engineer to re-investigate.

QXgN~ OTHER BIISINEII5
a)

Coouitlam River Dvke - Status of Dvke Closure
Deputy Engineer gave an update on the Coquitlam River Dyke. The plan is to
proceed within the next two weeks and it is anticipated that the construction
of the dyke will take six to eight months to complete. Committee received
this report for information.

b)

Recvclina Problems at 2446 Wilson Ave,
Committee reviewed a report from the Project Technician regarding the issue
of using grocery-type bags for recycling. A letter was written to EIL from
the Project Technician asking them to ice'orm the residents as to why the
grocery-type bags are not acceptable.

c)

Waste Manaaement Act - Imuerial Oil Ltd

Committee received information on the site at McAllister and Shaughnessy as
to the soil remediation as requested.
d)

Paint Collection - G»VRD

Committee reviewed a response form filled out by the Project Engineer in
regards to GVRD's Paint Collection via Curbside Program. Committee was
in agreement that the Province should submit a proposal for disposal rather
than having municipal crews putting it into the landfill. Response form
should be forwarded to the Fire Depar:ment for comments.

masan

There being no funher business the meeting adjomned at 6:00 pm.

p~g.

ity Engineer

and adopted by the Committee until certiTied correct by the
e.

@15

Is

II%

Qgmg ~
APR 13 tggg

nasa»::~a~lual

~a

~ a»a»a yga
i

~

aaa

ltalms»a»»a»ssaaaa ~ ! pl~as»a~~»sai!slgia»aa»g](]
@IIllII
~ »aaaa s I I I 8 I I 1 II!!
~
lip I 1 1» m ~ ~ s I I
I I

~

I

i

»

I

i»aagi~@ICttt;
..'—,—.:..»cela
—

g

'i'u'I

JEY/cd

balll'll

Counpiffor M. Gates
Con6nittee Chairman

I~»llll1g(IR
~ »at!t as
'1%1 IIlaut s !, u»w»... l II Iflgsl»»aa»
"!11 litt'g $ I1i11;
a,g
II
~ I ~ I 1 55 Suua II a !! tt 1 I !I lsl ra a s i a t a!s aII
»»
g QQg
a
1 11 1I~~ [s ts!tl flR!I Il IKsll»a!E~»
Igi 111NlI~
u» 111I IMIII~i
I»

I

~

I

» I

~

I

I

I I

I

i

!

~

'I

I

» I

ii

L
si;-„;.»»sll
"m» =

—:: =W

=" "'I!NIg 11llgll -='-" ass
&E
"" — -ii Iiymass» In lullalg1111I»a»smog SSll tg I it//
'

Ill

i

THE CORPORATION OF THE
CITY OF PORT COQUITLAM

TO:

Environmental Protection Committee

FROM:

Anne T. Pynenburg
Project Technician

SUBJECT:

TELEPHONE BOOK ~~CLING BC TEL

DATE: April 06, 1994

—

~BGROU~OMMENTSt
Pamela Nel, of the G.V.R.D. Waste Reduction Dept., ha& passed on sotne information regarding
the collection of telephone books in the Lower Mainland.

BC Tel is offering to sst up bins at 3 locations in Port Coquitlam. The bins wi1I be drop-off
locations of white and yellow pages for residents and businesses. The target areas this year are
the IC&I sectors.
The bins will be 6 yd. containers with a lockable lid and slot enny. BC Tel will pay for all
advertising (including flyer distribution to businesses), bin drop-off, signage on the bins and
hauling charges. They will be offering the bins for a one month period. Pick-ups will be made
once per week. Bins will be available in all municipalities at the same time.

If the City is interested in participating, the contact person is Tom Wishlow at BC Tel.

Anfte T. Pynenburg

Project Technician

THE CORPORATION OF THE
CITY OF PORT COQUITLAM

4

C.TO:

Environmental Protection Committee

FROM:

Anne T. Pynenburg
Project Technician

SUB JECT:

SEABOARD ADVERTISINGiG.VELD. TRANSIT SHELTER CAMPAIGN

r.~

C

DATE: April 06, 1994

RECOMMENDATION:
That the Environmental Protection Committee support, through donation of municipal
advettisutg space, all Transit Shelter Catnpaigns EXCEPT Phone Book recycling campaign.

BACKGROUND A

CO~S

Attached is a letter from the G.V.R.D. Conununications and Education Dept. requesting that the
City send a letter to Seaboard Advertising giving permission to use our municipal ad space on
bus shelters.

All municipalities are given 10% free advertising space from Seaboard Advertising to be used
by the municipality for their own purposes. In the past, most municipalities have uot taken
advantage of this space.

~

The G.V.R.D. would like to use this space in 1994 for several advertising campaigns aimed at
environmental issues and waste reduction. The five campaigns are:
Air Quality
-Pltene-Books —

Water Conservation
Composting
Christmas Wrapping

I support four of the campaigns with the exception of the Phone Book Recycling Campaign. My
reasons for taking a second look at this are:
BC Tel is a private company with their own resources to fund their own
advertising,
phone books only make up from 0.6 to 1.2% of Port Coquitlam's solid waste
stream,
a better campaign would be to target newspaoers which make up approx. 60% of
clif was'te strealll, and
the question is not necessarily one of monetary value but of political value; ie. Port
Coquitlam singling out one producer of waste and offering them our advertising
space albeit free space.

m,ill
glli1m
~u~ iiil5
)'$['['t tutus
1!!! ii!lgl
N[.W tt N I
I

Arme I'. Pynenburg
Proje.t Technician

attach

f+tss~

APR13 goy

IIF...-..

ms

~

.-,

„g)g

.

g

-'"»N»ii
am,'„,— ~ii Li =-g/gag!l
~
— —

i~',,I!RiII~X!

Ql

—

Cocllnunlcaucro and Educaoon
Telephone (604! 432.6339
Fax (604! 432-6399

Greater Vancouver Regional District
4330 (gngstuay, Surnaby, 8r(ush Cotunldra. Canada 96H 4G8

W.C. Sinclair, City of Bumaby
Bill Mortensen, City of Richmond

Mike Mah. Surrey (c/o Bill Stillwell)

Roger Emanuels. New Westminster
Don Cook. Port Moody
de(f Ytp, Port Coquitlam (c/o Ann Pynenburg1
Gary 0 Rourke, Maple Ridge (c/o Tom Gardn
Len Mierau. City of North Vancouver
Ed TrotUer. Langiey
Ted )Oassen, Coquitiam
Ken Sheaves. Delta
Norm Nikkel. District of North Vancouver
Don Bowins, Abbotsford
Fred GledhQI. Matsqui
A)tx Sales, Vancouver (c/o Julia Gordon)

'-rf» '.ll,
(
1

-

'

)

ides

Shari Graydon, GVRD Communications and EducaUon Department
2S March 1994

As oiscussed in our phone conversations earlier this month. David Cadman and I
met with Seaboard AdverUslng to discuss alternatives to the current system requiring
individual letters &om each muntctpa)tty each month. Due to the unpredictabQity of
space avadabihty (as experienced in the Qrst month, requiring a change in posting
date). this system would have necessitated mcnxthly phone calls to and possibly
additional letters from each muntctpa)tty every month. To avoid this, and at the same
Seaboard'8 contract requirements, we have agreed to the fogowlng:
Ume
Each munfctpa)tty interested in parUctpaUng m one or more of the GVRD's
pmposed transit shelter campaigns wQ1 send a general letter (see sample attached) to
Seaboard. agocanng their free space to be used cn the dates and campaigns being
requested by the GVRD. The letter should specify, however. that this blanket allocation
can be superseded at any tune by the munfctpagty, which may mform Seaboard in
wrtnng SO to 60 days in advance of the reqI&esied Ume, as noted m the standard exLsbng
agreements.

a~ate

IIII!I'9
I!

ill I(

g i!it ~ sli

,,fl:..II,
n

I I
gfjfjj
IIsee lu [/ I

I!I ~ I ~ nllff

j

i!fig!pl)!IIIII

~

l'

If!(sf))'9!
,

s

I

I

i

I

si

I

Bile

I)i 1lglsswr
— - -rwI

w

~

ff'!ltl III Ij)sf!is'"'"i fsf) rj,iij iI
sI I ls Ilsslle'nl III ssI ws s( ~ .
I

I

5 !

()!

~

I

~II

9

I ((( ! i!! S ~
I

I

~

ill!(jj

I)jjmgjjL) 1)N

jis

'

g(RI ffifs iisl lgzjfs 8
5 n Lat

'

~ IS e,
I

—

M I In I SSS ~ ~ ~ l ne a
I

iii!. '" — ,''I'll IIIIIII 5 lm

ff

I

~e

fta!

—

.

—

----

S
-

1

!)

s 'Is+ I! ~ 6! 1

I

ylllll
eiil(i

ljl flsrssI

I

]Q~

'.

Its! ssI

'

1

I

1

III;",HING'~'=:ii~~====,:~f=
SS S ~ I I I ~ Q SI 9 6 l~ f 8 U 1
1

!.

s

i!)j jjsfim I;:.I .'m!!I)j'g»

ae

I

s
sr iesslll Q E

Isla ll Elis!I I%I
'~~(mg!
6~:: ir: ':'!!!ass
ma

4

I

8 I 8 I sfg g ff)f)f)I

I

I 6

I 8 8 8 6 u ! ff 9 w B i tsf 1 1 i i is I I esse l "

„~as ~a==-~xiii~=.=.':= &meimlll[l

B

II

551 P l HdV

s

se

Cej

gSe

es»

I

esj

K

C

g

4

g

R'

4c

5

0

f

g

C.

0

CC

0

gI

Z

CO

y

K

0

C

s
s

z
CIS

JR aas

I '

I

.
s

5 elii a iiiy
r

ces

/hajj lllljlg

g

ge

C

ces

g™

I

I

0

%IIII lk'

sss

g

Co

0»

CC

5%fllI

egging]jml

( f)jjiiiet

gIsw'Pill
gg

a

~

~
g
~

g

~=

-"
j'0) jgg4g
—— "
seas s

+III~

— ''

5

g,
jllg
sew

~

.

— - . jjgg jjg

'" asis
I

.

acWiIP /
l~ II lmjlK=;.
ssasmBI1RISI'
~

s

s,,"::
Ilj/g
~

~

~

~

„' Ie&nsii

's===-;c
I

~~ ~~~~~,

'ggjjg jjg g ~[gg~aeeea
I Ill) j'Nj jjggfg//Q~yglasrc s:! 'l'.".%g/Q pgggl —
g-: —.:calf
e
'IIe%s sis
ssmeseecc
j
1IRRCjCCCC II ggj ggglf P
ajj ji
'
-- — ~~'aICflljbj
C
%1~-- IIC gg
=

i'.'~
CII,

Cl

s', s

",:

~

iaesaCRlml 41%" a „"~~I~5%eiissggg

~~~

~ ~=

—

I

iRIII5liC I)HI

r
eae- —
—

..~a~

- -

I

]I

g,

% IWNk.

ae

'ajs

—. SCAPI
%%KC

g,~

'--.-''PP
jj "":

I

=

~

"

aasaaesa lil SAIC

~m ee

I

Ca

eeea

~

-=

---I

l

—; ''.="
~~

'-

aa
IISSNjs~~585dSK%1IIUMRI~~ SEE- — Ia eesi
SCIL NCSI555
s

IRSICI I

ETL Environmental Technoltygy I.tffl.
A Member of the VITRAN Group of Companies

12345 - 104 Avenue, Surrey, B.C. V3U 3H2
Telephone: &604) 589-4385 ."ax; f604) 589i7833

CO;
,.:

February 23, 1994

e'Pe

'

i95ng

Anne Pynenburg
Recycling Coordinator
Cite nf'?orr Conuitlam
2580 Shaughnessy St
Port Coc tlam, B.C.
V3C 2A:

PIPe. I

Re: Telephone Book Recycling
Dear Anne,
I found the following information regarding the percentage
telephone
books recycled through our facility. Be aware that the percentage of phone booksofwi!
I vary during
the year with a high from May to October when the directories are renewed.

a From a municipal phone book collection event

during October 1993,
phone books represented 1.2 % of the recyclable material collected from
the households.
A sort of 8'ae bag material in November 199', showed that phone
'ed 0.9% of all the recyclable m..oriel.
books reprr
~

~ An analys.

UIixed Waste Paper in Nov. 1993 indicated that
phone books present an average of 2.4 % of the MWP stream.
MWP makes up about 25 % of the composition of the materials
r yc!ed through ETL municipal programs, therefore phone books
are about 0.6 % of the total stream of materials recycled.

8 I tantta

Therefore, our dam shows that the composi tion of phone books in the stream recycled materials
can vary from 0.6 to 1.2%. You could compare these statistics for telephone of
books recycied to
telephone books distributed and found in the waste stream (Bunela Nel may have these
statistics)
to determine how much of this material is collected for recycling. Although telephone books
are a
highly recognizable item in the waste stream, they are a fairly minor component compared to other
paper products (eg. ONP, mixed household paper). I hope this infotmation is helpful for your
decision; if I can be of further assistance, please give me a cail,

llR —,
I

W

~

Yours sincerely,

IL—
ea

liiIeill

attar

L.Jane Robertson
ETL Environmental Technology Ltd.

THE RECYCI ING COMPANY
Praa d a Reeyeferr Payer

f

~ xiii" am'
a—

; ij

I[ I iiti

I

====as
gtiftSRilRIR IWIII

":~i eiwelae=
~)am
sa
=„'t~ltttitS'nta'r
~wa —

'nI ii5llIjI

ha ii ie"

l

jl
~

=,

I

iiii

IIj~,'.—.—4

lil Il,gggg

!',.'-;aa

ar

j~ i,,

[IIIIIII

~~I~ III
i

I

I

-

i~ —

'

I

tt

/II gg

gIgl lire

eewa

~ ' " — '" "'( II
)tlute~ere iaifi
ae r iil
I amIat)Inc~I lta ffla))t
;::Njl iaf irtua i i)i Lll~iMiiill iiliia eaii g tmIaaeattRl::: - --u»light;;, ... 'I iIIiiii m iiiiiilh!:—,:.-:
I
—
/~aeaeeeaer
.
—.R~
met al~ eeaeattti as Strtgl~ ~m' I
aaa
rmjet+I
'C)laaaa~~ree
aam

LL--

a...

~,
IIW

illlIII+

tmtli1IR

eua

aa

=

~

~m

eae

elaHL

~

i

~

aal

a

I~t~

fsrovince of
British Cofumfsfa

Ministry of

Forests

Vancouver Forest lceston
ed of Canada Wav
Butnaby, B C,

VSG ebs

February 24, 1994

"Protected vlreas are a major component
of ffrtnsh
Columbia's camminnent to protecn'ng the
quality and
integnty of the environment, and ta securing a sound
and prosperous economy for present and funtre
generanans. Bri nsh Columbia will designate and
manage a system ofpro(ected areas for the purpose
of
protecring a diversity of biological. natural and
cultural heritage resources, and providing a
uanety of
outdoor recrecman,pporrunities e
A Ptoteeted Areas Strategy for Bntish Columbia,
June 10. 1993

Re:

A Solicitafion For Puhhc I~nut to "Arms of I~nt
Protected Areas Strategy for British Columbia (&AS)

": Lower Mainhmd Reuion

In the statement quoted above, government introduced the
Protected Areas
presented its aim to deliver an expanded and integrated system of Protected Strategy snd
Areas that will
conserve i 2v% of the province by the year 2000. At present, British
Columbia has protected
slightly more than half of this target within the current system of
Ecofogica/ Reserves, Provincial
and National Parks.

Within the Lower Mainland Region, a Regional Protm&ed Areas
Team has been given
responsibility to assess the degree to which existing protected areas meet the
Strategy's goals. and
to sohcit submissions for other areas that msy meet unfulfilled
goals. As part of previous land use
planning irdtiatives - Parks and If'ilderness for the 90's and the Old Growth
Strategy - public
groups and interested individuals cont."v ".M largely to the list of PAS Study Areas
and of Areas
of Interest now being assessed under the Protected Areas Strategy. More
recently, other groups
have specifically been asked to identify their interest areas within
the vicinity of southwestern
British Columbia. These areas will also be evaluated by the Regional
Protected Areas Team.
To provide a greater opportunity for those not yet involved in the
process, the Regional Protected
Areas Team invites your participation in identifying provinciallyimportant areaswhich
may
contribute to goals of the Protected Areas Strategy. Until April IS, 1994 the Team will
be

accepting submissions for Areas of Interest within the Lower Mainland PAS Region that
you
consider to be of significant conservation, outdoor recreation or cultural heritage value.

Iliii

I'suea

APR

tHTat salol

—

—

~~~~~ if~gP/RI~~~if ii) ~i~'~

I

——

!

9'I:-, -=:
~~

L'="=:'='-

s

i& ~ ~

smt~s

lljhvJ~~ SISS

~Q

@ II I ttIP%— -

—

~.„euv
— „,,

I

loll ele t
~

~t'BsmsasnmIII Sl~aam S eass~ltIts/

«~
~S
~

II S tf

SIN /I

Ilsmltsl

IIII SII

~~mI~!Ij~

3 1ggt,

Il I

eaiiil I!

Gary W. Sutherland, R.P.F.
Chair, Lower Mainland
Regional Protected Areas Team

enclosures

I'apt'RlI

LAND REGION PROTKCTKD AREAS
BLIC SUBMISSIONS FOR ADDITIONAL
AREAS GF INTKRKST

~
~
~

rid s Bjost

Columbia's nshnal legacy ibr fimnc
gnnetathjas. ln response, thc government
iaihated
Arum Strcmgy whiCh Will

the~
fmman~~ofh's
oonuaiuasat in
a

fidht within
agonal Pwht,

balance
emdrmtxtsrg with a
Protected Atnss Stmtegy wiH be used bs hmd.

expsmi rhhr

p~~tnr~ttmd

grown oval'ftn
hevu chsaged aad:
raining Ejjhhgt ."

COntntlffe4 ftr

to Cablttsk

public pmticipatioa is kcy to achieving a
colnPfcbcnnvc
system of Pfo'tcctcd areas.
~pttndt'ng ty
Extensive public input received during earlier
m nai wt'tt
initiatives (including Parks snd Wilderness for
OVAIC8 b fke
the 90 's and the Old Growth Strategy),
stgmficandy shaped thc Plotcctcd Areas
ftyrgef itjg7f be
Strategy. Continuing founai and informal
public involvement is essential to meet the
nd, Jl'8$kwttfer Strategy objcvxives for the Lower Mainland
f tgrtv set ttstde Rcghm. Thc first stcP wfil bc lo rcvlsc thc
current list of Study Arms that has resulted
&om earlier initiatives.
erituge and
Prrstftcrfcns ace tcctcd Arms su tegy
wifi respect the nasty rights and interest that
ulttes.
I
exist for land and resource use in the province.
As a matter of policy, the govenunent will
consult with Fijta Nations where activities under the Strategy could atfect the exercise of these rights and
interests.
!

J

I!!mam[

¹I=

frrrplementfng tfte Strategy in the Lower Jjpfrnnlend

[l

~

Protected Areas.
~

I

RRwIRR

Government is rcstAonsible for definin the Strategy and Cabinet for approving Study Areas and

R

The Lower Mainlaad fatcrsgeacy Maasgemeat Ccmmiuoe ALA.hLC.j, comprised of senior
Bjajjsgers of many Ministries, is responsible for the review, approval and forwarding of Study Areas
to Cabinet.

wRaia

g... "IN'g
Criiii &gg!

.'jtjl

pjt,,

jmlI I

~!il 'It¹~RM

r~

vRAI

—
I!I„; „",--;
—

APR

I

3

jill

J

Mplwnm~irst
p Ng jghR CIR~j,
g''-'-NllflllIRH-'""":"R-=--="„-;
"".~'==-:, IIIII' Iii
=='~a~Se&!m!N!,"'""
"&& rt.=:ia ==='9-=~ g.ggmmggggggg!lhtnm,.
—,,
en a jss, all
Mfiggjti5lg
q
II

—

—

i

=: -==-=. - = -==-== ====-===-==:=-

gs ~

= ===-=- -'=-..r'= =-

====-.;:

e

The Lower Mainland Regional Protected Areas Team (KP.A.T.), is responsible for conducting
the technical inventories and analyses required to identify gapa in the current protected areas system,
recommend revisions to the currently approved Study Areas, identify additional areas of interest and
consult with the puhlic.

e

The Lower Mainland Joint Steering Committee, comprising a broad section of interested parties
and stakeholders will consult with and assist the RPAT in the selection of candidate areas for
protection.

During ktarch, 1994 Open Houses will be held to seek further input and to review the
protected Areas Strategit progress.

In keeping with the Strategy within the Lower
Mainland Region, the SPA Tis extending an
invitationfor the public to review current Study
Areas and Areas ofInterest and to submit any
additional Areas of Interest. In order to facilitate
this process, the ItPA T requires inforntatton for
each of the areas proposed and also requests their
submission before April 1$, 1994.

II Pm

~

atg)t III(I

I

I

~I

&5 rs st
I

1

)IIII

I ii Isi m, i )
~

II

se aal

tS 'Imi
NII53

41/

t

DOUO

)

j

I5gnii iP..—. lg~~:,
—

.;-:~llpg~ml~lm'I~~)~)tn'ttugnuh ~pnmassnn~

t~tiam;===---: lcm

I

vm~a~~nss .
~

tasvsss CONSUUllNU /FEB l 994

~~& I

lIII!Ink;~uIILI!I!.'—,s!~ —

~~ ii~~"

I

u

"" — ~IRgkg sttausmI

— =~ihltnmttmagN)I

a'
g~~IIIyI,-»),.~IIIlmi&IP nant
&

«4 l ltd

a

~~

W&~==~gntilI" 8lluimi~=
I

~ ~

'To whet dag(ae woUld Iflle eras enhenas
opportunNeo in s trsrd desUnsNm region'f
~ To

~I'

what degree weald this arm enhanoe
oppanuadas in a
eetttngT

'To stint dagllul would alla ares enhanoa seacosttan
opportuaieea for losel twwaa

ll Ill

Itlllll
)]@]~&~r

ult

ssrwa.~ IM~~~~

APR 13 1994

I

~
A) 11/94

Ril5

MWew~paM
ii e I sa r — ~

~,'g j j j a al c »
j

i

i

.

—

--

j,

S5
@gpg~~gl~&&g/
~,'

[ I,' / I L KI$ %
I

~

„. -;."

= Ig p 8 8

Thc Rcip'ona) rocccted Areas Team (R.P. AT.) requires the fallowing informadon
for the

submission of

I.

One er more araps at a scale of I:50.000 wluch accurately identiiy the
boundary of the pfopo
pro sed
Area. If an Ares cannot bc properly shown at I:50,000, thea a larger scale
(such as I:20,000), or a
smaller scale (such as I:250.000) should be used;

2,

A Name for the Area should be suggesred: one which relates to major features
or characteristics of
the locale;

3.

Typed description of tbe Area which utilizes the "Use and Appmciation Evaiuatioa" criteria
included iu this information Package. Areas of latcrest selected for the P.A.S.
evaluation process will
cootribute to Goal I and/or Goal 2 of the Pmtected Areas Suatcgy.

To protect esamples ofmajor tertustria/, marine andfreshwater ecosystems, charactensn'c
hah)tars,
hydrology and landforms, charactenstic "backcounny" recreation and cultural heritage values.

To protect cramp/as ofspecial natura/, coin ral heritage and
"backcounoy "'recreati on features
including rare and endtmgered species, crit/c/habitata oststmtding or un/ tNe botanical, zoological,
geological and paleontologicalfeotures, outstanding orjagile cultural heritage featums and
outstanding
backcountry outdoor recreaaon featums.

IRR
SMI
8)Ill(

@IIII

IIII

PROPONENT:

'lNI

CONTACT PERSON:

PHONE

Nlllll,
I ILII'I I J

WILD (

I&I'E1

I

lill

i

FoR zt ORE/ttsotutsrtottcottrsct

g

Doug Lcavers.
Fact)itator, Lewer Mainland R.P.A.T.
Doug Leavets Consulting,
904-I625 Horuby St.
Vancouver. B,C. V6Z 2M2
6SM609 FAX 68746I2

Chair, Lower Msinlaad RP.A.T.,
cio Ministry of Forests
4595 Canada Way,
BURNABY, B.C. V5G 4L9

IW

& NNII

NWRI

m) i Wil
SR I I

Ills
Ill(

IRlil

7ggN

BRI I I I I

~
She

e~+ — ~: — —

~~pjNN

~mci~~~~ RENm ye~

.,''~aijPgs

mtmtat

Rgl+PI%1@gtgl~ltmutIIii
i
~ II'

~g'Ill~ ~~akmIBINEl NIIS~IMNI

THE CORPORATION OF THE
CITY OF PORT COQUITLAM

TO:

Environmental Protection Committee

DATE: April I I, l994

FROM:

J.E. Yip, P, Eng.,
Deputy City Engineer

FILE: EPC

SUBJECT:

~NE

LAKE - BURKE MTN. STUDY AREA OLD LOGGING AREAS
—

B~GROI NQ dt COMMENTS:
The Engineering Depamnent has been in contact with Mr. Frank Ullman of the Pinecone LakeBurke Mountain Study team to review the question of where logging has taken place in the Pitt
Lake area. The study team does not have an overlay of the areas previously logged. However,
they have provided a map showing the age classes of timber within the study area.
As indicated
in Mr. Ullman's letter, dte areas most likely harvested are the areas classed as 1-60 and
60-120.
As indicated previously, there is a moratorium on logging within this area pending a final
resolution on the study.

The Committee may wish to recommend that they are supportive of Option C, however, the
study team should consider introducing "special management practices" provision for areas
suitable for commercial logging.

J. E. Yip, P. Eng.
Deputy City Engineer

JEY:cd

w

Nl"iil
Lll

I%18

Alii
ii ii'
',l,

hate

~

i

j'Fl Wi

IN!1 I Nl

llR4j,
n:: =:

.::: Iw s a

a t ~vvN
~
xiii ei~t= a ~ ~
i

III

'1~ =-=~I~Ii,'its'.=- aN
ltasat~+''

I

APR 13 1994

ll I

1

~

~

~

sna R w I
I

~
~

s tt

2

I nw a wl

~
at=='I=tins&.=,

.—."..'—

R'~

i=sat

N'8

luau

NN'j

l

I3:9998A IHTAI9901

f

!

I ggig/

''

—: '-'a I4i4lm

IMII9
—

~

i 9saI a

Ia ~ ss
I

I

=

ma4ii%5III

II/ F19

/jig'~

g

+mr

4 1% 9

I

IR
9 i 9M
~I

~IBgg54imill~g g Q)~

s sa MQ
% Issas

as ~

~191SSS

~ 4 41194

as

Hl ~ 3

e~
AIR

I

Sl Rl
~ III 8 I

14 Sill ~
i

11

SS ~

I

I

4~

SI ~ iil IF

IR siSS=.

aaaM~Maa Im

I

lliilRII e

'~4

1, I 41 4 Ii
I

'IRg iggli

I

SR

14 RII

i

—

I

'P

Ni i % E I j g ya IIS i I i SRIRSS

~ IRSRSR

I

I I
I

-

~

8

.. ~SNRRR

1 I I44
I

I i

R S

II

gag

~

~ ~ +~ 4

~i

Pl N S I

I

II

~ esse
+su etm

(b)

~

11M

~ii Sl

,

—

Q

I&&g&

I&ll111,~
ni'~ ~ mimer

.

Ill 1 Islt lallt
ast

another prescnbed substance m quanddes or concentrauons exceedmg
prescribed criteria, standards, or conditions".

At this time the Ministry is not proposing to cha'nge the way in which it defines
special waste. Regarding (b), prescribed quantities or concentrations, we are
considering making certain changes. I refer you to page 4 of "Notes to Reviewers"
in the attached package for a discussion of our proposal.
.../2

)gila
I

-. PR'13.$ 9'k',:

IHR II IIIS/

".' R t —

tt lfl a I

g

I

I

~-

I

ggs

.'~„tiki,~l%

~: —.~=~

~

ling~%'

.:: „'="-':Please conte'ct,m'e if you require any..further'clarification p,'asgstince.

~

i '::-~'I 'T;
"

flubbed; F,.Eng,

.hidushdal Waste Bz Hazardous Con aminants Branch

'nvironmental Protection Degartment'

..1-

~'.'..",,! A';.:;,,';,

" Attar.'hment
~

wE

I,

1

Q

t

'c

HELP US MKKT THE GOAL r! r

M

Sinre 1990 we have been legislated to meet
a goal of 30 % reduction by the year 1995 and a
50% reduction by the year 2000 of solid wastes.
You can do your part by making use of our

recycling system.

&,-~. r~P ~4g ~ ( r
(~(CO~TY
z

YOUR

NEEDS YOUR HELP!!!

Reducing the amount of waste going to landfill is not
entirely about the diminishing available space in our
landBilla. It's about conserving our natural resources
and reducing pollution.
Se Don't Trash It
Blue Bag It.

—

r

j

K

e'z

.

t ~. L —:
(e e.s&

APR 13 1994

Ng Qllll5

%Ãl

location does not require additional trees.
The south side of Kingsway Avenue between Coast Meridian Road and Konnings Ltd. is a suitable location for
tree planting. Konnings Ltd.already have planted a strip of trees along the front of their property; therefore, tree

planting along the remaining section will complete the entire block. Mr. Herbst recommended that 15 to 20
Silver Maple trees, at 30 feet spacing, will complete this section of boulevard. Mr. Herbst estimated that the cost
for the trees v;ill be approximately $ 2,000 and cost for labour and preparation work will be approximately
$ 3,000.
Along the dyke at Kebet Way is the most suitable location for tree planting since the trees will provide an
aesthetically pleasing environment for people walking along the dyke. The entire section of dyke from
Kingsway Avenue to Peace Park will then have a strip of tree buffer once this section of dyke is planted with
trees. However, Mr. Herbst estimated that approximately 50 trees, at an estimated cost of $ 12,500, will be

gmiNr

Cont.'d ..22
APR
5

%iRINllgM—

I

3 1994

required to complete this section of dyke. The $ 5,000 donation from BFI Ltd. is
only
to complete 40%
of the tree planting; therefore, an extra $ 7,500 is required to complete tree planting theadequate
entire

section of the dyke
from Kingsway Avenue to Peace Park. It is recommended that the EPC request the Parks
and Recreation
Committee to contribute $ 7,500 from the Parks Department annual tree planting budget to
complete the section
of dyke on Kebet way from Kingsway Avenue to Peace Park.

Francis K.K. Cheung, P. ng
Project Engineer
FKKCI
anachmcnt

Mp
Ifsgt ii
~=:-=-

iink

sl/j'~iiLI

f~

I

++%IS

I+[),

~we

I/

n
gy'i iwsramsai
=WtlBWj

IM 6
IW158I /
I

Ilaljdki ii'i S
jN /Igni'sa
'ill'N

Sr

l1ia-.—.
jg
I~ sgggl ~
~

g

50(l
i%Ill,l

igkll
$$

Fj& @ATE.

51

lrr414'
I

44

I

ll r 11 r4' 5

I

41

Sr ~ II

[jg iiim

411 I 4 44

llr K
HIRE

~

/ U'lrllr4pi4i4 44 ~ll&j

I'll+

[ Il

11! &4 I

%1 II%A 411

~

I

I

Illle'ei

jrl

~

I

4

II II

I

/pl

II llllj—: ;,

..., 4r r f,
I

",

:::; l~'. ll I

I

I II 8 R

~
iiiiiaiii i

Ilg fg 4 44SBR I I I I

— '—
.

I

'pkl

~

5

4$

I'

~

~ m1
I

II

Wrr sll ~ IR
~

gggrr"-.—:

'll

I IN

r

~~

I

1/I
III

::= I:.I ill IL44
14 44411."

~

II~I

II
I

mN

4WJ

D4

EISI

e ill
I

j plllll I I
$

S

S ~ IIS[

SS ISSII.I

T/'f'

'C-'r

av
.

S[[

li

a~&,

~,, [
3, „—.—

III'lme[5W[g[se
i

I[IS[&

l[[

',

—

—

R S IKSH

—

~SNS[[[[,

SeS[SISWS[le»[

a'P

a[[[ /IN[ Q[[gg [[gg~ [==''~~~=

.

'I[[S,'„~pe

APR I

v'"

'[[: -== = [gPggSSgSg[g[[i le 'll

'~
„~ 11
': .....:S:
~~s j eels'

~

SS [[ [~

=-ee

/),,g,

1994

51~

I

1RI I li I[l

I IIII

I

'

'4

I

I[[

lIIIS IS S Iil

". -:::.'-'S~ amiiih S[R

~a'IM / II/ K

~

" s i -.

=:: ~

15fRii
lSIPIll

December 16, 1993 correspondence conveying DRAFT Part
I of the regulation,
including notes to reviewers.

III
~IH&E
1~

February 16, 1994 correspondence notifying stakeholders of
a delay in
preparing DRAFI'art 2 of the Regulation.

8

1

Wednesday, March 30, 1994
I:00 -4:30 pm
Vancouver SFU Downtown Campus
Harbour Centre
515 W. Hastings Street
Fletcher Challenge Theatre

mI

lk',ll

I am pleased to endose a copy oi DRAFT Part 2
of the
was the case for DRAFT Part I, we will be holding tworegulation under Bill 26. As
identical presentations on
DRAF1'art 2, as follows:

ll~ll(l

I I

f

Thursday, March 31, 1994
IN30 - 4:30 pm
Victoria Laurel Point Inn
680 Montreal Street
Breakout Room ABC

~illl

g 51% fi'

I

I.ti,l )li',
R m 0 )f /
i

I

I

p'll

APR j 3 1S94 lS-'~r-'I-N 'I

~sNNNN~NNN

%4 ~&i& iialls

IIINI

NNNI
NNNi

NN NNN

'IIS till'S

Q /i / /Ig II

g~~

.",:„':nl iI1i PI i
i

~ I

.-. .': S

I

IN
I S

ea i

NlelS5'

i

eN

I

I I N

e.

'l l

&NIaI

+ is s
yg

I aI. e: - = I M a I g
'.

fIIIslI II III I /

I

~ ~

~~ ~
NN

»&N ~

waai III

ilN INSET

M

(sl N

15-

~

~e'

N

Nisi

jective will be to provide an overview and answer questions, but will n
sit policy decisions inherent in Bill 26. Participants will not be expected
e detailed comments or views at these meetings but will be welcome to
e preliminary comments if they wish.
n comments on DIMFT Part 2, or submissions on any portion of the
ed regulation will be welcom'e at any time, before or after the informatio
gs. As well, every effort will be made, as time allows, to schedule meet n
uest to discuss comments, suggestions or implications to specific
try/interest sectors or types of site. To fadlitate such meetings we prefer t

with groups of representatives with similar concerns. Grouping arrangem
n make would be appreciated.
chng future consultations, the Ministry intends to prepare the final part of
on, part 3, within the next 4-6 weeks. Qnce part 3 has been sent to
lders, the three parts will be consolidated. At that time the comments we
ceived on part 1 and 2 will be incorporated into the consolidated regulation.
ocess should begin in early May.

re your views are taken into account in revising the consolidated
regulation, please send your written comments on DRAFTS part 1 and 2 to me by
the first week in May.
We have also established a mechanism for responding to stakeholders on the
comments they have made on the regulation. Rather than respond by letter to each
comment from each stakeholder, remarks will be provided in the text of the revised
draft regulation explaining how and why comments were addressed in the revised
draft.

Thank you for your continued interest and the time you will take to review the
draft regulation.
II%A N,I

Yours sincerely,

AJ II

II

IFi8%

I'l!
II

I

e eel I pl

L.T. Hubbard, P. Eng.

Sllmi iI)

Director
Industrial Waste & Hazardous Contaminants Branch

~

I O'

mii',i ii
Ie ea J I I Ie \
I

Attachments

I

el Ile e I I a I
I

I

IIII 'll
j

cc: D.A. Fast

II%I I
'

I
I

III I I

I!II ~ 11 I

I

Il

'14 ~

I

I

!~recall!

IK Al!
I I I al 111
I I!

~

e

I

I

I

g
I

li

I

~

~ l ea a!!mile
!

I

"~i:, InIII 51iie
eliI
II

I e

I

=—

'H

~

«eaSIm '' ''

a

ltl 9 I! i ae:1
A

el ee
I I

~

eeelliR Pa'a~

'.

-""

—" il e II
- ca Isla ,i
'.....
---

I

I I!

I

~

.

i

il iii i"

SSaaa
~
~

«P AAAII

~9

!aea ~ p N e ~ Iee a! ——

I'

II%I
I

~e

I
~

A~* «a!,
«aaepe ~ I

a«a'r

I, IIIII "! I I
I e! I I
I u
~ a

im'

Isa

"I!

.! ie'I»:=

AA:: ---

'

'I 0 II%A= =

I'~ ~ 1Siiei
.

-

——
~i!alltaA+,:

I

I

Il I

m

a ——

"1 il

NOTES TO REVIEWE

DRAFT Part 2 of the Contaminate
1.0

General

The Waste Managenrent Amendment Act, 1993 (BIL!
1993. Before the legislation will be proclaimed, regu
necessary technical and administrative detail.
The Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks is
p
sites regulation document, which will contain many
preparation and consultation, the regulation has be
These separate parts will be consolidated in the final
A consultation plan distributed on November 15, 19

timing for the distribution of these three parts. DRAFT
stakeholders on December 16, 1993, and information
discussions have been held with stakeholders since
called for distribution of DRAFT part 2 of the regula
was overly optimistic and has been missed by appro!o
Ministry intends to continue preparing and consultin
regulation as quickly as feasible.

Our target date to have the legislation and regulatio
October I, 1994.
2.0

Important Reminder About DRAFT Part 2

This DRAFT part 2 regulation is being distributed to seek commentary
on the policy
and administrating methods reflected in the regulation. Representations
to BC
Enrdronment will be considered in the preparation of subsequent drafts. A
final
draft of the regulation will be prepared by Legislative Counsel at the Ministry
of the
Attorney General. Thus this DRAFT is also subject to organizational amendments
and other changes to be made by Legislative Counsel.

General Contents of DRAFI'Part 2

3.0

Iii

The provisions in DRAFT part 2 have been organized into seven different
divisions. Most divisions contain a number of sections. DRAFT part 2 also refers to
six schedules. Schedules 6 and 7 are lauded. The remaining schedules, which are
application forms, will appear with DRAFT part 3. Where possible, comments
received from reviewers of Bill 26 have been addressed in this DRAFT.
Topics broadly covered by the seven divisions and 30 sections are listed below:

SIP" Il!—'.1
II
R: -— -

IIIIIHI
'allili

'! II%I I! I!

II,&

Sl
lliIE%l

jll1klll
IIIIISIl
II
ISS
~

4

~

~~S

'lS S ISS 4I

II,PP III 4

Ii' Il!I l

''

=
P /!IIII il!5 ~
I

II
~'

s.l ~ II I IP '

ssssse ass

I "44+~1!Ilt t IIIII ~~
ali! Is! ~

IIPP

'' w ~

~~,

~ M ~ S

I!

~ a s 4!PI

%If 1 i fill

llllPI n! ~ str

'!a4 4

SI I!I@I SW I
I

I

as-—

=

4 II
I

g
y
q
g
compliance with environmental laws; owners of easements
and rights of way;
secured creditors; receivers, and trustees; and persons innocently acquiring or
leasing property. This division also addresses timing requiremenis and clariYies the
meaning of the diminishment or reduction of assets, both relating to the issuance of
remediation orders. Requirements for application for minor contributor status and
voluntary remediation agreements are also provided.

la

I

ii'g
III

Will

I

Nll
lllli(ll

el ~ J
Ila III I
II
!

L

~

il! l! 1.1

lit@ I

&I

Ia e

~

~~ SNIIII~IIi~& ~
~
a
m! m ] ES I l j!e ~,
S

I

IS%I

~

III IS

IslS

I

I

aa Naa SIa-

IA

IS IS

~$

II

8

I
~

usa I —,—
IDL

I

I

5

I

!

I I

tI

+aa

JI I

I
,

" — = =.-I!

U

41% ~ II

I

l

I I

race'
II,'.'„A,.-'S J
I

~~

5%IVI IH V

pH H ~ I I:
!S! I I

*.

I

II'll ~ Sl I

I

I

ig

I

am

IIL

I

J

I

a

sm

a

I:

'i SalI

I

8 5 ~ I LS

'R

%%1

I

ll'a! i 'I

IJk

I!amt

~

M

:,,'"„& jtti

i! I

N
!I%I'!

M s,

HU! M /

-3Division V addresses contaminated soil relocation. Provisions address t
relocation of uncontaminated soil; circumstances where contaminated s
deposited without a soil relocation agreement; conditions applicable for
for a soil relocation agreement; and standards for contaminated soil relo

Division VI deals with steps required to receive approval for remediatio
completion of remediation ot contaminated sites. Provisions address ap
principle; restrictive covenants under the Land Titles Act; certificates of
for remediation of a site; and security requirements as a condition of a ce

Division VII lists various areas for which the Director of Waste Manage
approve protocols, methods, and procedures used to characterize and ass
This division also includes security requirements for various administra
functions and agreements.
4.0 ~Div '
bv Division Commentarv

Division Ii Annlication

4.1

Section 1. Intercrretation

II
Nmai

' I W I I Ir

'commercial'CL) and 'industrial'IL) lands are defined, as well as four groundwater
and surface water uses: 'drinking'DW), 'freshwater aquatic life'FW),
and hvestock'LW) water.

'irrigation'IW),

t

R)

Section 1 (1) lists 20 terms and phrases which are of key importance to DRAFT part
2. Five land uses, including 'agricultural'AL), 'urban park'PL), 'residential'RL),
I

I(i'll

I~Ill

i

Toxicological terms used to define a contaminated site and set remediation and soil
relocation standards are also provided, including 'cancer risk', 'carcinogenic
substance', 'hazard index'nd 'hazard quotient', 'risk assessmenY and 'risk
managemenY and 'environmental impact requirements'. The section also defines
'soil', 'background concentration'nd 'trustee's well as itemizing the possible
contents of a 'remediation plan', which indude:

site location and contaminant
distribution information
R remediation alternatives
~ selected remediation methods
~ dassiflcation of soil for relocation
~ risk assessment documentation
where risk based standards used
~ remediation schedule
~

discussion of regulatory requirements
proposed worker health and safety plan
R proposed post remediation monitoring
~

R

plan
proposed controls where on-site
management used
R proposed public consultation or
remediation review
~

IILHSU

ljl1i
—
jt, mii

liijh't
Ia r~l

III
&—

'.--'- —:, jfiijtrillii'II%I
lllli! ii,-ir
~r

r~s ILI I~
r

I

&aa ia

Rl

—

I

~

all'I I IIII R"',", ....,,,„„~

R

= -riaal~raii

~im

r«rr:
--- "— ~Sar
iak' '

--

—

=.—

ll ='.=:,",„-;==-.='.
'rRlr ~pmlieg
!III 8 a ':
"Q!ISIS II l'
'

-—

=

-.

--" Stsii
'rear
~. -='
—

—

Im

-&

-

'0"

-~" aSNIII
~

II

'

ination

criteria by which a site is
of the Waste
d or water contains
escribed standards, is a
be these standards.
s and Parks has defined a

'Criteria for Managing
dated November 1989.
tances relating to

e Environment (CCME)
teria for Contaminated
Program. The interim
trations for soil contained
nerally reflect water
mbia,

run environmental quality
e CCME for groundwater
nt in 1991, a few of the
date criteria have been
received advice from the
odium adsorption ratio
ntamination of a site, and
iation. Thus the criteria
e CCME interim criteria
) I%I

RI 5

IB I IKI 5 Nl

ksse

I)

Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. Interim Canadian
Environmental Quality Criteria for Contaminated Sites (CCME EPC-CS34),
Winnipeg, Manitoba, September 1991.

2)

Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment and Energy Pathways Inc.
Report on the Contaminated Sites Consultation Workshop, April 23-24, 1990,
Ottawa, Ontario, May 30, 1990.

l555ljlS
s ~Sl Ills%I

Il Ill//

RaiR(I

IMI Ij
[15ti~ie m
~

i

llgg;

''ing liiii,i'i'st.;.- -s&,~
elm.',,

1
.

g

~MF
iiiiii l

I!

ill II ii i

-„',,== g
— "lk III

ee ia

1

——

eas ~',set~I

——

~
iarilsegn

~I

I

I

~I

158' ~~I 'n~c~li~,~
s e ssls
0! If srse
~ ~,
flit
u

/

~

m~

'

a

~

I
~ in lulMul+ g)ig +ra
as
j ~ j ~,

la II ~ $ 5111s
lr

alsa ~ ua

-'--5 Jl&RJQI &~:-~iihl ~ a ii~„~

3)

Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment and Energy Pathways Inc.
Report on the Contaminated Sites Consultation Workshop II, November 14-15,
1990, Toronto, Ontario, February 14, 1991.

4)

Canada. Environment Canada. Inland Waters Directorate. Water
Quality
Branch. Review and Recommendations for Canadian Interim Environmental
Quality Criteria for Contaminated Sites, Scientific Series No 197, Ottawa,
Ontario, 1991.

Schedule 6 of the DRAFl regulation adopts as British Columbia standards the
CCME interim environmental quality criteria for soiL Three columns of substance
concentrations appear in the CCME document, for agricultural, residential/parkland
and commercial/industrial use. Schedule 6 uses the identical substance
concentrations, but splits each of the paired land uses into two columns, with
result that Schedule 6 has five rather than three columns. This format has the
been
adopted for Schedule 6, in anticipation of planned revisions to the CCME criteria.
Subsection 2(I)(a) and Schedule 6 provide that for any of the five land uses
where the concentration of any substance in the soil of a site is greater than above,
or equal
to the concentration of that substance in Schedule 6, the site is defined
as a
contaminated site.

Subsection 2(1)(b) and Schedule 7 provide the numerical standards for substances
surface water arid groundwater, for irrigation, freshwater aquatic life, livestock andin
drinking water use. For any of these four water uses, where the concentration of
any substance in the water in, on, or from a site is greater than or equal to the
concentration of that substance in Schedule 7, the site is defined as a contaminated
site.
The situation where a substance is not contained in Schedules 6 or 7 is addressed
by
subsection 2(1)(c). It indicates that the Director of Waste Management may establish
a standard for such a substance which may be used to define when a site is
a
contaminated site.

Section 3. Determination of Contaminated Site - - Procedurg
In some cases a person may wish to darify whether a site is a contaminated site or
to
seek formal recognition that a site is a contaminated site. Section 20.3 of the Act
establishes the power of a Manager to formally determine whether a site is a
contaminated site. It also provides two stages of the determination procedurepreliminary and final determination. The purpose of section 3 of DRAFI'art 2 of
the regulation is to set out a 10 to 60 day time period for comment on a manager'
preliminary determination. Once a final determination has been made, a manager
has 15 days to notify persons described in section 20.3(e) of the Act.

APR13 1994

two approaches for
rst approach uses
c land and water
ach. The second
can cause cancer
s for remediation.
an assessment of

ation

edule 6 as the
ch, once appropriate
so that the
that substance for

groundwater at

s. Once the

diated so that the
that substance for
establish a
ovided in Schedules

ackground levels of
emediation in
that the remediation
quent sections of
on methods and
ances.

land or water uses,
indicates that the
stance among all
n standards for that

-7-

~nn 5. Application of Risk Based Standards for Remediation
Subsection S(1)(a) presents the risk based standard for remediation of
environmental media containing substances which cause cancer. For any
carcinogenic substance, the maximum additional lifetime cancer risk due to
exposure to that substance at a site is seven in one million. The substances which
cause cancer are those dearly identified by the World Health Organization and the
United States Environmental Protection Agency as posing a threat of cancer to

humans.

The limit of seven in one million has been applied to contaminated sites in British
Columbia since the late 1980's. This value was adopted by Cabinet as the maximum
acceptable cancer risk for the remediation of the Pacific Place site, as recommended
by a committee of independent public health experts. It is based on the cancer risk
implicit in the Canadian drinking water guidelines for radionuclides. It also falls
within the one in one million to one in ten thousand risk range currently in use in
the United States for remediating contaminated sites.

WR

Subsection 50)(b) indicates that exposures to substances at or from contaminated
sites which have noncarrinogenic effects are also limited. The scientific term used
to compare these exposures is called the hazard index. When exposures to
substances with noncancer effects exceed acceptable levels, the hazard index will be
greater than one. Conversely, when exposures are within the acceptable range, the
hazard index will be calculated as less than one. Further detail on the meaning of
these terms is provided in Section 1{1).
Subsection 5(1)(c) sets the risk based remediation standard at the ba"kground risk
level rare in cases where the level of risk from background concentrations of any
substance exceed the standards in sections 5{1)(a) and (b). Again, procedures for
determining the background levels of substances will be specified by the Director.

Subsections 5(2) and 5(3) address environmental impacts, where the previous
section addresses human health effects. Subsection 5(2) requires that an
environmental impact report be prepared which identifies the potential impacts of
any contaminating substances before or after remediation, induding procedures to
mitigate these impacts. The latter provides authority to a manager to require
implementation of these and other procedures to prevent or mitigate the impacts.
4.4
vsssi Il!

i¹lll'iiiii@ll

Division IVi I.iabilitv
Section 6. Persons Not Resnonsible — General

Section 6 pertains to transporters and generators. It clarifies that liability will not be
triggered merely on account of a transporter or generator requiring a person at a

abandoning a site without making reasonable efforts to protect human health and
the environment. Where such abandonment occurs, the receiver, receiver manager
or trustee may become personally liable.

-910. Per ans Not Resnonsible — ClarificaHon of InnoceLLt Acquisition

ion
1)(d)(i)(C) of the Act provides immunity to persons who "undertook all
nquiries into the previous ownership and uses of the site...". Section 10
factors which should be considered when determining whether a

rtook appropriate inquiries when acquiring a site:
her the person claiming the exemption had "any specialized knowledge
perience" respecting contamination,
lationship of the actual purchase price to the value of the property in
vent that it were uncontaminated,
nably ascertainable information about the property,
bvious presence of contamination, and
try and government standards of practice applicable at the time of
sition of property."
Section 11. Persons Not Resoonsible — Clarification of Section 20.4(1)(e)
Section Il, taken together with section 20.4(1)(e) of the Act, clarifies that an owner of
property who leases or rents that property will not be liable for contamination
caused by tenants and lessees where the owner had no "reasonable basis" for
knowing about the contaminating activity.

!I/3
INIjlR

I I/I

Section 12. Persons Not Responsible — Clarification of Munirinal Exeutpfigu
Section 12 darifies that the term "government restructuring" of section 20.4(1)(g) of
the Act includes a "municipal boundary extension or municipal amalgamation".

Section 13. Remediation Order — Timing for Consent and N~&i e
Subsection (1) imposes a 10 day deadline on a manager who receives a request from
a receiver, receiver manager or trustee as to whether the manager will issue a

remediation order.
Subsection (2) imposes a 10 day deadline on a manager who receives a request as to
whether, pursuant to section 20.5(7) of the Act, assets may be diminished or reduced
at a site.

III S

II 1LJ

III N I%1

Subsection (3) provides that the manager may, in certain circumstances, extend the
10 day deadlines of subsecaon (1) and (2).

II %Ill
III I'

Subsection (4) sets an upper limit of 30 days to review a person's request for consent
for the disposition of assets pursuant to section 20.5(7).

Ill ill
a
~
I I iii l
P

I
I

APR 13 199li

U

I

PL

i ~

'im

I

Il

'Ii LII

Ill

Rflll

ji

i!1.!E

E

Section 18. Non-contaminated Soil Not 1%Waste"

lit,l

ll
',EI

41.4 j41'Imij
I

I

j

I

~

I

184! III

I

'

II

I

jl I

would be considered contam'nated soil for purposes of this Division, and when
removed from the site could be subject to a contaminated soil relocation agreement.

Section 18 clarifies that soil which does not meet the definition of Econtaminated
soil" is not subject to requirements for authorizations (e.g. permits) under the Waste
Management Act. In the absence of this provision, any excavated soil from a
contaminated site whether or not it is contaminated could be considered "refuse"
under the Act, and therefore could be considered "waste" and subject to a permit or

approval.

Aereements

Section 20 contains procedures which pertain when applying for a contaminated soil
relocation agreement. A Schedule will set out the multi-copy application form to be
completed. The applicant will complete Part I of the form, awhile the owner or
operator of a site proposed to receive contaminated soil will complete Part IL The
original will be forwarded to a manager while copies must be retained 1.y the
applicant and by the owner or operator of the proposed site of deposit.

'IIIII
RI

)IIlII
1 Inn

I I

Section 21. Preconditions for Contaminated Soil Relocation Aereements

II!1 li 'I
~I

I

Section 21 states preconditions to issuance of a contaminated soil relocation
agreement, and to the start of relocation pursuant to such an agreement.

SII II

I

I

Ill! Illil

I

III

I!

I

I

I

An approval in principle pursuant to section 20.71(1) of the Act is required prior to
or concurrent with issuance of a contaminated soil relocation agreement. This will
ensure that delineation and classification of soils at a contaminated source site has
been done, and that remediation options have been considered pursuant to sc don
20.9 of the Act.

I

na'I'1l

IIIII
IllIV;Nl I

!I a!a!!
I

I

I

a'

a ni
W %1 ~ l
InaI I
I %
1
i
Sa

APR 13

l! hl

—
iiÃl
'=-: al isa;
—

I

1

I

199/4

!tt!Iiwllul!"'' '' " a

",

ti t!!
I

a,I Itin

I

l

I:I

111

I

1 II,

I

I

a

~

~

''

I

L

',:: 81

~

'I
I

I ~

!!I!0!sB

II

I ~

'III'

I

I

I

I

!!

I

~

I

RII
5i Ill

INPUT

III Fl'I Ill,
a ~ I al I

IIIIII&l

llllll! I!

'il'l!''or

II'il

1 88%

W8%

Section 20. Auolicatinn Procedures for Contaminated Soil Relocation

llglll

'«151!m

+

deposit.

IIIIIIII

-12Municipalities are entitled to receive notice of a contaminated soil relocation
agreement before movement of contaminated soil starts. Section 20.81(9) of the Act
requires such notification and this section of the regulation requires that the
applicant ensure notification has been received before relocation starts.

~Si n 22. Numerical Standards for Contaminated Soil Relocation
Agreements
Section 22 states that the Schedule 6 numerical standards for soil, which
apply to
remediation at a contaminated site, also apply at a receiving site. If the applicable
land use of Schedule 6 is not obvious, a question may arise as to the applicable
standards. In this case a manager may designate which standards pertain.

Section 23. Risk Based Qandards for Contaminated Soil Relocation
Agreements
Section 23 confirms that the risk based standards which this regulation provides
remediation of a contaminated site also may be used as a basis for a contaminatedfor
soil relocation agreement, Various requirements appropriate to the deposit site are
allowed for in a soil relocation agreement. Example conditions are indicated.

Division VII Remediation Annroval and Comnletion

4.6

The new contaminated sites legislation provides the opportunity to apply for an
approval in principle, a certificate of compliance, or a conditional certificate of
compliance. These documents will provide written confirmation of the
acceptability of a planned course of remediation and a remediation plan (approval
in principle), and of satisfactory completion of remediation in accordance with a
plan and the applicable standards (certiTicate of compliance; conditional certificate of
compliance). Division VI of the regulation sets out the authority and certain
procedures to be followed by both an applicant and BC Environment.

N

Nil

Section 24. ARRproval in Princinle
Section 24 provides that application for an approval in principle can be made by a
responsible person, provided that the necessary information has been, or is
concurrently submitted to a manager. The application form will be provided in a
Schedule to be included in part 3 of the DRAFT regulation. A manager may request
additional information as deemed necessary to assess whether remediation when
completed, is likely to meet the remediation standards.

Where an approval in principle is sought for remediation of a site using numerical
standards or risk based standards, subsections 24(3) and 24(4), respectively, authorize
a manager to attach conditions which may relate, but are not limited to:

I

II II

I

I A I

Jl

l% ~

Llil

/

I

PRRR 'l.l

II

J ~0
JII ~ alR
~ 'I

II

I

I

~ PTI

III I I I R I
I

I lr Jl- ~ h '

IlllIII

I

I

R

II" ~

S Sl

- JBRRIR

I

I

I

Ill

26 and 27 provide that application can be made by a responsible person for a
certificate of compliance or conditional certificate of compliance, provided that the
indicated necessary information has been, or is concurrently submitted to a
manager. The application forms will be provided in a Schedule, induded with part
3 of the DRAFT regulation. The sections indicate that compliance with the
conditions set out in an approval in principle will provide important criteria for a
manager when assessing whether to issue a certificate of compliance.

I'ections
M 'i INSI/

II

I'mii
Ill&ml
Rll ial
hei

jjj

1

Is

I

sI

'..—

™.;"

if

JIJl5
11

si! 'g!j

I

j [j

l,'i
I
I

lf

I

'i!

II

!

I

jIII

l

I

I

I

l

I

j(
i

I

SggJigp 28. Financial Securitv
Secfion 28 darifies that terms and conditions of any required financial security must
be met before a certificate of compliance or a conditional certificate of compliance is

issued.

Section 29. Remediation Annroval and Comnletion for Part of a Site
Section 29 recognizes that secfion 20.71(6) of the Act provides for an approval in
principle, a certificate of compliance, or a conditional certificate of compliance to be
issued for a part of a site. Paragraph (a) requires that a manager provide to the
registrar information about the part of a site for which such a document is issued.
Paragraph (b) requires that a manager consider whether a restrictive covenant is
required for the part or parts not being remediated.

I

APR13 1934

-144.'F

I/5
II

Division ~IP Methods. Protocols and Procedures Aouroved bv the Director

It is recognized that methods, procedures and protocols would be helpful as
guidance, or are required for consistent and effective application of Bill 26 and the
contaminated sites regulation. Many of these procedures are technically and
scientifically involved, and their inclusion would make the regulation lengthy.
Inclusion in the regulation would also result in reduced flexibility.

Subsection 30(1) authorizes development and approval of various technical and
scientific methods, procedures and protocols including those covering matters and
topics listed in paragraphs (a) through (h).

Subsection 30(2) authorizes development and approval of methods, procedures and
protocols for determining forms and amounts of financial security which may be
required.

'imi jiiiiii8
:IRI'
44 el I

gl111

j

la~
Ietta»
4

III

I

8a-::Il
4ll ~

ll ala* ~ o

I

IllI%54~4 Peel

'll IR54

lPPee

l

I:4

='
II

Pl

'

Illa

I

a

II

~ I

II

!

'

a
e

III
II
~4

IPPI
'
~

I

le

LI II'

ilj'
I

Ill
N-II ll II I
Pl'ii 4 ai
l
u
'
I

I

I

II l
I

I 44
~

III

»I

al II

1414

Pll

~

II

u l sill

'I'a

4 ~ I44

I

I

4

I

ee

DRAFT REGDLATXON

—

PART 2

Maste Management Amendment Act, 1993 (Bill 26)

Table of Contents
IVISION I -- APPLICATION

Interpretation

1.

IVISION IX -- CONT))3eINATED SITE DEFINITION AND DETERMINATXON

2.

Definition of Contaminated Site

3.

Determination of "Contaminated Site" -- Procedure

IVISION XII — REMEDIATION STANDARDS

Application of Numerical Standards for Remediation
Application of Risk Based Standards for Remediation

5.

VISXON IV — LIABILITY

iNlil

7.
WIN)
1144

8

9.

441(I I

10.

I)11 1IIeeell

@i~&psg
14 IF

IBM

II'll

14

Persons Not Responsible — Clarification of Municipal

R44II II II
1) 4~
'Ilier'lie
II4

Exemption

lg vs eel

'i

I

I\ I e I I I

I

i!

ii:i i

I~ i,kl'I 'I fl

gI

e

I I

jI II i$

pl

I

1

I

I

4

15.

Minor Contributors

16.

Voluntary Remediation Agreements

(

I I

I

14.

Remediation Order — Timing for Consent and Notice
Remediation Orders — Diminishing or Reducing Assets

13.

ej cia liiiii il
e

Acquisition Exemption
Persons Not Responsible — Clarification of Section

20.4(l)(e)

5 IBI
4 iei) sl lp(

14

Persons Not Responsible — General
Exemption for Certain Ownership Interests
Secured Creditors
Receivers, Receiver Managers and Trustees
Persons Not Responsible — Clarification of Innocent

)4

i

)1

iir

~

i

%)4sl~ —54 IBni ---

e

)'

—

i

~

APR 43 1gg4

~

I

J

~

I

II ~ I ™11)

I

. —.

4)e44

I

= ~",III'Ll

e RIB

&eaell!5 '=

Il I

-jjLele 1,
I

' I

4) ~
I

11

4~ 4 I
I

I

I

-""'i 8(141le,

)4I

I ~

~

i

e

II/Il le ~ la

e li

1

I

14]

I

I

i)i),'lie

lee

I

)I

::.11 I) ls II

I

i)

= e IP

'' J II) II4

~ 4

IL~
elle

t

4

I

e

)I

)*

~

%41 ~ I

MI

—

'5M(1841

DIVISION V — CONTAMINATED SOIL RELOCATION

Definitions
Disposal of non-contaminated soil
19. Deposit authorized by this regulation without a
contaminated soil relocation agreement
20. Application for a Contaminated Soil Relocation
17.
18.

Agreement

21.
22.

23.

Conditions pertaining to a Contaminated Soil Relocation

Agreement

Numerical Standards for Contaminated Soil Relocation
Agreements
Risk Based Standards for Contaminated Soil Relocation
Agreements

DIVISION VI — REMEDIATION APPROVAL AND COMPLETION

%

24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.

1%K(N

ml I Ml

l/fiiRie~
)isis!sigl
~s

~

r

I i

i

/@11

i

Certificates of Compliance
Conditional Certificates of Compliance
Security as a Condition of a Certificate
Certificate for Part of a Site

D1VISION VII —

METEODSl PROTOCOLS AND PROCEDURES

30.'ethods, Protocols and Procedures Approved by the

IGNI I'

re r i: iN

Approval in Principle
Restrictive Covenants

Directors

I I I

ig
'lzll
lI

Schedule 6 Soil Numerical Standards
Schedule 7 Surface Water and Groundwater
Numerical Standards

l,'se~

SCHEDULZSI

$ f Niii,'SIar
g!!!Ilare llg
Iirlerlrle

'!l f! j II I I

$

'Iill

ir SI I IS Ii i)g

'iii 'i!II
)
iillll'S

I!I
~

g.-.

!

lmlrlR PI%I ~

11M

I

~: ~ ~, I'IIII

~

I

g'J

HR ~
'e ~

'

'

IIN'I I'IGNI — —

i,'ii~
'e

1 i
el ~ III

I

~

I

l

IK

~

!.'!j

l ~r

— -

I

!I II

'

''I

'

I

' l

'II I":

la'41

Lrl lI ~

& I rrr
r

=

~

',.'ll SL ill ~
I

l5iisz

~NIP — - -

mi mrrr
!
] [Imr
—:
sill I!II i%le l

I

:nr

I!Ill ri!

— — —— m m! s I!'IK:

-8srrma

I

~
il

~

-"'

I

.esa..
I

~

J rr

II

.= ghii
~

=

——

—.

I

Irllr

I

DIVZSXOS 1

APPLICASI'.TOSS

Interpretation
1.
Immsm s

(1) In this regulation,

I

"agricultural land use" means the use of land for the primary
purpose of producing agricultural products;
"background concentration" means the concentration of a substance
in an environmental medium in the environment in the absence of

the influence of direct human-made point sources of contamination
determined following methods, procedures or protocols approved by
the director;
ILINI[N
II'8'm51NI

8"'===
~

'4 W W

I ~ ~
I

I%I 1I''egg(
I

14

s '=

=g

hIR I%I

IISLi'usJ

(i'ISI I

6

f

"cancer risk" means the probability of the occurrence of cancer
in a human from exposure to a carcinogenic substance;

'carcinogenic substance" means any chemical classified by the
International Agency for Research on Cancer as a group 1 or group
2A carcinogen, oz by the United States Environmental Protection
Agency as a group A or gzoup B2 carcinogen;

m ie siisil5I'I

ER'sss

'g

I'II

lg

)

([m
IHI'i
III
I

'

i, fg
APR 13 199JI

ii

'Pl

I

III S"

%

IS%is'" ''-

Iil;:

~

~

—,

I',SS

""

~ ~,5N misemieli iismem ssiSlf%1S I!I

ll

Si IS%el»

1st s

ear

44 II

~

ll

9

IF

N

iassas~ P ~ 'IIIIII

~

.

I

I

4 III mi 1144

"s» ii i'Is

IggmIIBSSI UiS ]g S II

"commercial land use" means the use of land for the primary

selling, or trading of merchandise or

purpose of buying,

services;
"drinking water use" means the use of water for the primary
purpose of consumption by humans;
"environmental impact requirements" means the requirements
specified by the director for the assessment of environmental
impacts and for the protection of non-human biota from the
impacts resulting or expected to result from exposure to
substances at sites;

"freshwater aquatic life water use" means the use of freshwater
for the primary purpose of habitat for any component of the
f reshwater aquatic ecosystem, including phytoplankton,
zooplankton, benthos, macrophytes, and f ish;
"hazard index" means the sum of hazard quotients for any
substance over all exposure pathways&

~

]

Im

'DZ

'hazard quotient" is defined by the equation
HQ

1am e &s& e &I

RfD

' IIL
II 5 5

where

sn~g[
gpSRR! II aIR

I I I'I)
I

Rk
il

I

I

'L I I
RS(R Ii
R

I

I

I

I

.,-! =...,..., ..„,.~....
I

/

m

~ ~i
.

II- - em: = =

is the estimated daily intake (in milligrams per

"EDI"

kilogram of body weight per day) for a non-carcinogenic
substance, and
"RfD"

is an estimate of the daily exposure level (in

milligrams per kilooram of body weight per day) that is
unlikely to produce an appreciable risk of deleterious
effects during a lifetime of exposure to that substance)

"industrial land use" means the use of land for the primary
purpose of conducting industrial processes, including
manufacturing and assembling and their ancillary uses;

"irrigation water use" means the use, d'stribution and
application of water for the primary purpose of producing hay,
forage crops, pasture, cereal crops, vegetables and fruit;
"livestock water use" means the use of water for the primary
purpose of consumption by livestock;
"remediation plan" means a written document which includes but is
not necessarily limited to plans and other information on
(a)

gl IsI IBII)IN)

i I

IIIII'i

IiS'ross-sections

15 I IMlw/

(I

IS)I

sic&m: s

,I1IIisI
I-—

I

overall site location and delineated horizontal and
vertical locations of contamination presented in maps,
and other graphic representations,

IIIISI

,ill
'':—

equi'"

II.=

i I~I, II)
ills'I
5
(IrE

'
—
.~
'~~-."....
'II tImseI
I)i!„-- "''"'.— "j,,:
-,)ll mIp)',',,
——

)1

—

-

",

i

51 ~

~w lR%!Ill

~ msa (I~

fg~

l~&'

ggE)s

I:

N

~I

1) Ii

~rm ass ~

iIII'IIINI

az,

~i~

s e psIaae

elIil ii i~ad"
Il~ll

—

—

APR 13 1994

'

~l'1..
H.--j ~~ iIIIIFIIss) ))swII

. =

„,Ie

ggShi

~

[

j S
I

s»mS~~ m ii~ai

)~~j

ggssSIMIII

{b)

{c)

(d)

remediation alternatives which were considered for
managing contamination from or at a site, and
evaluation methods used to assess the factors under
section 20. & (1) of the Act and any regulation,
remediation methods selected to ensure compliance with
standards in sections 4 and 5,

identification and classification in accordance with
Schedule 6 of any soil to remain in place or to be
relocated,

(e)

risk assessment calculations and methodology where risk
based standards will be or are being used,

(f)

a schedule with estimated dates for implementing

remediation,
(g)

identification and discussion of implications to
remediation of known regulatory requirements, including
authorizations which will be required to implement
remediation,

(h)

s&

which are
proposed worker health and safety provisions
stcam
appropriate for the site and will be implemented during
remediation in addition to requirements under the

imsa~ll ll

I~] ~II Isssmssem5"

((1(~l~aR

I

IC

) ( ~,

sJ

QI)I
E

'I

I

I I ~

~I~

'-

—

—

/III JI

Industrial Health aud Safety Regulati ons of the
Workers'ompensation Board of British Columbia,

(i

)

proposed confirmatory sampling and analysis after

treatment or removal of contamination, or testing and
monitoring to evaluate the quality and performance of

risk management measures on completion of remediation,
%II(13

,

ensure security and ongoing management of contamination

IWI'I II
I

'%318

Iillilkiii')

II.III

where it will be managed onsite, and

i(~ 51
I

Lj'8

(j) proposed measures and controls to be put in place to

(k)

IIlt II
Illa'.(ll

'11$ 11I f

any public consultation'or review of remediation which

l.fillt.

has occurred or which is proposed during remediation;

I11!SsllP

LU! I K I
I

II U )Ill I

"residential land useS means the use of land for
(a)

l'lt) II
I

!I I

I

IJ I I

!

SS

',

IIIIl,l

f$
I(e iiii ii

the primary purpose of residence by persons on a
permanent, temporary, or seasonal basis, or
instiP utions, schools, and daycare facilities;

"risk assessments means the systematic process of identifying and
evaluating substances, persons potentially affected, and
exposures to the substances in order to estimate cancer risks oz
hazard indicesf

IS! 'I!

!
I

(b)

(III I

I f5

'll811
Ii Sii iI

1

)

ihill

l

'I I!15
S
I!f
!

IS

I

ill,i

I

'',I

I

Sl

1'

~S,III
IIII

g~mssS555lg~"
sss
I/~ Ill!SSS
„, @g(IIIIII ) FRIIIII jj
'I~gIi
—

,

mI

11lPsSe;;;
I as

i

~II

pig
aa

mlslllllhll)
Ilgwu~
lllle~~II~W~

Iiimlpll
"risk management" means actions, includin
to prevent or mitigate human health or en
any contamination left onsite;
VII111N,

iI'Il 1I

"soil" includes unconsolidated mineral or

II Ihip

$

fill, and sediment deposited on land,"

'li,iliI
I'HALI

III'I II
ideal
I,'8 Ilk,l II

I-'4 s

I

sJ
~sI /
i
iegl IIIII
j
Zllll
I

'=::
R

llNIIS1

"trustee" means a person who acts for th
another person in a fiduciary capacity at
"urban park land nse" means the use of urb

purpose of recreation.

eire
~ ira9'
SH
~

I I

Pltlii

il

I'Il R I III I

ALKI'IIII
'I'I
iIS IS ~

(
S

I

Sm I

SPI

Sl SISIT
S

ll

S SiS SII

sls

I

I II

a1si

l II

SJ Sg

I(IIII fll

IIi" 1»1
1

p ilr I

Il

1'

la

I

IS

ll

I SS I

111

'

1(1) of the Act,

definition, means

llml

Rill

gill

rcial, industrial,
urban park, or residential, and the concentration of
any substance in the soil of the site is greater than
or equal to the concentration of that substance

specified for that use in Schedule 6,
(b)

the surface water or groundwater which

S ~ I4S S

Ilii!II!I!ij

is located on the site, or

l)

flows from the site

'44ii4I'ii
II I 4

4

l

'l

4444

j

ill) II Jl g
g

is used for freshwater aquatic life, irrigation,
livestock or drinking water use, and the concentration
of any substance in the surface water or groundwater is
greater than or equal to the corcentration of that
substance specified for that use in Schedule 7, or

)

3

'

'
I

I s'l I
I

)I mIB II

Iih,(iiiI
444l

I&I

'll
~

4

APR 13 Igg&
I

I

~
I

aI

4 g!

I

I

I

I

10

(c)

the concentration of any substance, not specified in
Schedule 6 or 7, in soil, sediment, surface water or
groundwater is greater than or equal to the
concentration established in a standard for that
substance by the director.

Determd.nation of Contaminated Sites — Procedure

shall, pursuant to section 20.3(2)(c) of the
Act, provide an opportunity to comment for a period which is no
less than 10 days and no more than 60 days after delivering
notice of a preliminary determination.
3.(1)

A manager

shall, upon making a final determination under
section 20 '(l) or (3) of the Act, deliver notice of the final
determination to persons described in section 20.3(2)(e) of the
(2)

A manager

Act within 15 days of making the determination.

a aiba r

PPPSI

OM

STANQARDS

ards for Remediation
s of the Act may be satisfied

standards:

r agricultural, commercialP
industrial, urban park, or residential land use does
not contain any substance with a concentration greater
than oz equal to the concentration specified for that
substance and use in Schedule 6,

]hi)~PS
ass sIIli I

Ip M,IIIII

III'~
l"==
AIR
j

(b)

surface water or groundwater used for freshwater
aquatic life, irrigation, livestock, or drinking water
use does not contain any substance with a concentration
greater than or equal to the concentration specified
for that substance and use in Schedule 7, and

(c)

soil, sediment, surface water or groundwater does not

'h(1'15

I f]

Iiiii
IlSF I IS
fl'g i

I III'

'

'S'P'I
I

I,

'lmlL)

i

l"

ppppe i II

I
I

ImP I
'IP'IS ~ I
~~

I

',

'll'Ill)
,

I

Sl

IP

I

contain any substance with a concentration greater than
or equal to the concentration specified for that
substance and use in a standard established by the
director under section 2(1)(c).

d

hjjtj

Ill

ij II'll

jj

llllll

l~l I
Illeal I'I
. I

I

II 1SI III
l

l

~

1 ~

'l

WP.'l

I ~ I»R

Il, I jll
~I

I

I

I

))

ll
P

APR 13 1gg4
I

I

I

I

~

I

I

I
I

telall

I ~

ps ~ I

PP

Il

~

:

I

Si.:

l

I

Lli

types of water use, the maximum acceptable concentration for any
substance shall be the lowest concentration for that substance
for any of the applicable land uses or water uses in Schedules 6
or 7 or in a standard established by the director under section
ml)IBImlll

2(l)(c).

kwai
im/IIIIIII

llsllll
i!!

! m)111 II llKI

Application of Risk Based Standards for Remediation

,a;:... „,

,!

)Pl~lie

Niii

~4s

I

lgw
!! I

I I

I I

4 ~

I

5.(1)

Remediation requirements of the Act may be satisfied
using the following risk based standards:

Rl!I l

I

ele

I'I

~ Pl

~

IP

I

(a)

'l

III

for any carcinogenic substance, the maximum acceptable
additional lifetime cancer risk due to exposure to that
substance at a site is seven in one million;

l,ll

e!M
I I ~ I

'lI

I 1

k
I

%

I'8

I

I

I
I

PIP'&II
'S ll ll
I
1

i II

~I

I

sell
e
sell e

I

I

'II'I

II

'' ~ ~l I

I

el II I I 11
~ I

H

~ll

I

~

aIil 4

I e Ice 14
.

Ill ~ ee I I I I

1

13

any substance which poses a non-carcinogenic

rd, the maximum acceptable hazard index due to
sure to that substance at a site is one; and

re a person demonstrates to the satisfaction of a
manager that the background concentration of. any
substance at a particular s'te results in the standards
of paragraphs (a) or (b) being exceeded, the
remediation standard for that substance shall be the
calculated additional lifetime cancer risk or
calculated hazard Index which results from exposure to
the background concentration of that substance at the

site.
person who applies the risk based standards of
subsection (1) shall also prepare an environmental impact report
(2)

f

SIISIIf IIeII I

I

~ '%1

I I I.I sI

II'l

I

I

I

II I

I

A

which identifies

(a)

the potential on-site and off-site environmental
impacts of any substances causing contamination before
and after remediation, and

(b)

procedures, including monitoring, designed to mitigate
any significant potential impacts identified in
paragraph (a).

(3)

A manager may

impose reguirements to prevent or mitigate

impacts identified in the environmental impact report of
subsection (2) or identified by the manager using other means.

,Mi
4481$ 44$
)g/%1%448

I(msIII
IhlNI8% Ill

1'R

]

jM ii aaa I

~

I

I

I

I

4

R 44 4

)

IFI14iii4li

a)"

i'I'jfkjei

g Il

I

'I I

'4

Ill&,e 4l
114%'14
111)
r
IM" "=-"

l
I

~

~

I

5...,

41M II 4

4 44

la

4

4

'

g )fli i

141
I'1 ~

I

(5

Ill'
~

I

I

~

'%

144

I

'

r4 I

I I

I

4

"

gll$ 41'

Mllll f 1:

II ~
I

I

ll

Ill

54" =

I

'

~

IM

5 I ~ 4.a

~

Il

"I

~I

I

~

J SI 14: 1: '-

I:::'--

..: Ja

—.—

4
'

+

I

I

—

4e

=

=

g$

44 I I I lj I m
8 44Slm4$
I

APR 13

I

Sa

I

I

s

N
S

~ R
I

I

~II

I

I ~

I

«ea~yM
1

111%ii SIISS

=
~
]~i~g
1

I

~

I ~

=

Sl

i II .
aa IS 8 a

595

~I~

I

SIRISSSSI

16

Exemption for Certain Ownership Interests
7.

A person

is not responsible for remediation where the person

is a current. or previous owner of
(a)

an easement, or

(b)

a right of way,

provided that the owner of the interest. described in paragraph
(a) or (b) can establish that the owner has not used or exercised
any right of the interest in a manner that, in whole or in part,
caused the site to become a contaminated site.

II

gL))

Secured Creditors
I sam
mmI
===:
I &Sl

IIIII)
IL 11aI1)I
!') )) I
1

$

I

IE 1111

Hlmna uim
s
I

I

1

II

I

1

I

8. A secured creditor who becomes the registered owner in fee
simple of real property at a contaminated site does not become

responsible for remediation at the site, and is deemed to act

I

~ s~
~

s I IGNIS IRI I+gs
9 ll~ljl

~l~

IM

!MSsls
.

I
~
I

II

z m! ) ~

~

IMRH wl

—

IS I
I~ 5 s
gIII

II

all

17

primarily to protect its security interest, only in circumstances
where the secured creditor
(a)

has complied with all applicable requirements of the

Act,
(b)

has not, either befoxe or after becoming the registered
owner in fee simple of real property at the

contaminated site, exercised control over or imposed
requirements on any person which, in whole or in part,
caused the site to become a contaminated site, and
(c)

has, after becoming the registered owner in fee simple,
undertaken measures to mitigate or control any imminent
human health or environmental hazard at the site.

o
[l5ii&iilll

(IliiiiiiiP,

RWII&'PR
l

iamii ai 1lgwf

)~—

Nm =

- —

)

~))s-

""ail)
~a

)ee I, BLI IIII a
I

13 1994

18

Recei.vers, Receiver Managers and Trustees

9.(1) A receiver, receiver manager or trustee who is appointed
with respect to property at a site which
(a)

is a contaminated site at the effective date of the
appointment, or

(b)

became a contaminated site after the effective date of

the appointment,

is not personally responsible for remediation as an owner or
operator under section 20.31 of the Act if the receiver, receiver
manager or trustee, after the appointment,
(c)

has not. exercised control over or imposed requirements
on any person which, in whole or in part, caused the

site to become a contaminated site, and
(d)

applied reasonably necessary steps to undertake
remediation and
complied with all requirements respecting

site profiles,
reviewed the records of ths property and, if

reasonably necessary, interviewed the

19

management personnel of the estate to

determine whether there aze any contamination
issues of concern to the estate,
where there were any contamination issues of
concern at the site, conducted a preliminary
site investigation and provided it to a
manager, and
took such action as is reasonable in the

(iv)

circumstances to ensure compliance with all
environmental laws.
(2) Nothing in subsection (1) removes the obligation of a
receiver, receiver manager or trustee for carrying out applicable
remediation requirements under Part 3. 1 of the Act, including
complying with a zemediation order, when acting as an agent,
officer, representative, or fiduciary of another person,
including a secured creditor, at a contaminated site, but the
liability of the obligation is limited to the realizable value of
the propezty at the contaminated site, net of reasonable fees and
expenses of the receiver, receiver manager or trustee.

',ll'I
receiver', receiver managez, or trustee is personally
responsible for remediation at a contaminated site when it ceases
to administer the property at a contaminated site without having
made reasonable efforts, consistent with diligent commercial
(

3)

A

!IIII ~

Illlii

11I!AI

i'll

nsiaasa iiii%51/)

~lg — —

+

/[(

~

j

", — '-

Jg )~ )'~5'~

— —

"m ~hmHm& =- '
~

~

'

-

~

~~"'+ f~

gMIygi )P sy= "

': '55 II)+

'')i ii
e

les sea) —.=

1II1IKHI %) lg~esSSS~~

== mneme

~

~

',

m

51( )g

'0

practice, to implement safeguards to adequately protect human
health or the environment.

Persons Not Responsible — Clarification of Innocent Acquisition
Exemption
10.

When judging whether an owner or operator has,

under section

20.4(1)(d)(i)(C) of the Act, undertaken all appropriate inquiries
into the previous ownership and uses of the site and undertaken
other investigations, consistent with good commercial or
customary practice, consideration shall be given to
(a)

any specialized knowledge or experience of the owner or

operator respecting contamination,

(b)

the relationship of the actual purchase price to the
value of the property if it. was uncontaminated,

(c)

commonly known or reasonable ascertainable information

about the property,
(d)

any obvious presence of contamination or indicators of
contamination or the feasibility of detecting such
contamination by appropriate inspection, and

(e)

industry and government standards of practice
applicable to the owner or operator at the time of
acquisition of property.

21

persons Not Responsible — Clarification of Section 20.4(1) (e)

Section 20.4(1)(e) of the Act does not apply to an owner of
property who
11.

(a)

leased or rented the property to another person, and

(b)

knew or had a reasonable basis for knowing that the

person referred to in paragraph (a) disposed of,
handled or treated a substance in a manner that, in
whole or in part, caused the site to become a
contaminated site.

Persons Not Responsible — Clarification of Municipal Exemption
12.

The term "government restructuring" of section 20.4(1)(g) of

the Act includes a municipal boundary extension or municipal
amalgamation.

Remediation Order — Timing for Consent and Notice

&I

13.(1) Subject to subsection (3), a manager who receives
(a)

1

a site profile under section 20.11(8) of the Act, and

II

Ifllll
IIRi

p pg ] 3

III

)QQQ

ss

I ~

d
I I I

\I ~

imI'i

I

s

~

Q

s

f

I))

.. '
-

)I~"','I'": ''„''-I :

.=—

—

II

i~

~

"

II~ I

.

~ ~

~

( )

'

I
)

g

(

,p(Igi

)

-':

~ss~~+'«,:g

i

(

(

m 0

I

I

1

M ~ II II

I Im I
I

'IIII)

I

s a

ae8 I

~Ih s.'.'

I

$ IE

I s
(

(

i I

I $

I

gN

22

a request under section 20.5(9) of the Act for notice
respecting whether a remediation order will be issued,

(b)

shall provide the notice within 10

days'2)

Subject to subsection (3), where requested by a person to
give consent under section 20.5(7) of the Act, a manager shall
consider and decide upon the request to do so within 10 days.
Where a manager requires more than 10 days to obtain

(3)

information, or to consider information already available, to
enable a reasonable determination of whether a remediation order
will be issued or whether the subject assets could be used to
satisfy the terms and conditions of a remediation order, the

manager shall

(a)

give notice to the person making the request under
subsection 1(b) or (2) that more time is required, and

(b)

in the notice of paragraph (a), state how much more
time is required.

I

tNii)
R 'S /
LB

In no case shall the manager take more than 30 days to
review a person's request for consent under section 20.5(7)
of the Act.

(4)

I

[

I~~
l@~~~

PNii
5%1)1

pg m I I I I
I

)

j'

$

i

lllil

g

i)

R

„;,,:: 'III

ma~

I

I

sRI I~i''IlmslllKe
' 'lllhse

'

~ gggIIIi I%i,'II'-'+i 'II/I]N~m~ ~p( (Rl

»m;r~~

('=

Jig&'jr
I((gIIII

a,;,», Illiaaa ui

Li Nk~-.i&I

~

"--- — 8

i

Sm~

.-

r

&

%%81'Ii

~

I&

iiiNll)I,I'II[ IIL'!ill 1 =;,
='"Ml iiN IIIINI (IliI iisjisl 's md') '-

Ng asia ~

s
s ~~,mL„-5~@

-.".--''i~- - - -- WS

&I—

— -=

-

-

-"=:=- --" 'JLIIJ
gg((N)[$ )(gI &easF-:c

'iiR"—: ~g ~
—

—

Is)IL)'((~"

'-- aa 'Sllllll

'~'Ll IIII((/](Ii ussI. ~

="'-~"" s"Nm(N

Remediation Orders — Diminishing or Reducing Assets

person does not diminish or reduce assets under section
20.5(7) of the Act if that person
14.

A

(a)

conve ts assets from one class to another class,

including without limitation allowing the conversion of
inventory to be sold and converted to a receivable or a
receivable collected and turned into cash, provided the
converted asset is readily available for meeting the
terms of a remediation order, if required,
(b)

pays fair value for supplies, services or other
benefits conferred upon the owner of the asset after
the date of the order, provided always that such
payment is required to allow a business to avoid

insolvency and to allow business-like operations, and
(c)

IIIIam

accepts payments on loans or advances, revolves an
operating line of credit, reduces the maximum available
under an operating line of credit, or refuses to
advance further funds.

Shard!
li,%%%I

)Sf"'I[tIIIIIII
M IIML 'I

gl)gll~l~

I

after the date of the remediation order, makes or

e

I

I~I Il:IW
l&(ii

i

APR 13 199k

II

l!

N)8)

I
~lm& ~

J ii

~
1))jj
=-*

UL

': --.— -"'- ..

-'=.:-lÃi".-! ...
— ==.
!(!? %(~ 's pggll + sc
I

.

- —

)(

.. "n fig%11

~

—

5II &,r,

"

Q

I

m z m)LIy!!I

"

.'2.+'- '.'m lj!Ip Qlg)l g lyssa

m "'4

== —

-' )jll '-'"-'-".=..", =;„,,--

II I ( &I

.,

—

—,

.

Nil'

'~I1151 %11

4

-~ ~a ~~/glpl/! gp/

eL— =:-

I
~

Ig

+ill "'"

~~ijl l~ ILAIL m~ai ala RI)=:=-"".~III ~;, ~",,''&~ l W!!!!III!,

24

Minor contributors

ls.

responsible person applying for minor contributor status
pursuant to section 20.6 of the Act shall provide information
respecti.ng
A

(a)

the condition of the contaminated site at the time the

applicant
(i) acquired an ownership interest at the site, and
(ii) disposed of the ownership interest,
(b)

any activities and land uses by the applicant while

located at the site,
(c)

the nature and quantity of contamination at the site
attributable to the applicant,

(d)

all measures taken by the applicant to prevent oz
remediate contamination,

(e)

contamination on the site or released from the site
which is attributable to

i

the applicant, and
(ii) other persons at the site, and
(

)

I

lei

„:=:"-'

I

II/

3'~)
3 8%Ill ~,e e &
I

-""~~ ~iL'ii(

H/ ~ sllmlwLsl!It

25

(f)

e

all measures taken by the applicant to exercise due
diligence with respect to any substance that, in whole
or in part, caused the site to become a contaminated
site, including any measures taken to prevent
foreseeable acts of third parties wh'ch may have
contributed to the contanination at. the site.

Voluntary Remediation Agreements

responsible person reguesting a voluntary remediation
agreement under section 20.61 shall provide the following
information to the manager:
16.

'IaiiN(iiin
imllIRIII'

(a)

a detailed site investigation;

(b)

a remediation plan;

(c)

a detailed description of the responsible person'

historic and current activities on the site, including
the amount and characteristics of contamination at the
site attributable to that person's activities;

~)

'I
J III Il, I

jm/gjl )jl Sl

Ill()Id! Wg
sees ~ ee em

=-',::., =-=-- "IE
":=:.-::
—
:=;.,=i
II.

g~

Iles~~

APR13 1994

j

j~us ~ I' gm

,,„',

I

lmplllll lllsll lelIj/jjmjI ~ I
I II)pl+

~,'hl

I

-a

~ I

~l jiml~elR

&

~

i

s

~

e aa

i

)s

;=-".,

'Wil

ii li IPi)II

Ill-"='; .—;l! i!
eiil II II sel
I iii

lj

)I

II

I

I

I I jj I

I

""'-"'" IS
II

='lli)1
e~
~(,IIiiI''
a
:

I

~

I

I

~

'i~~em

m dliIII

A

jlijljs

I

I

I

esl 41

'LI11

26

(d)

an estimate of the total cost of remediation;

(e)

an estimate of the responsible per-on's share of the

total cost of remediation and justification for the
estimate, including how the estimate is based on the
person's activities on the site;
(f)

other persons whom the responsible person has
reason to believe may, with respect to the subject
contaminated site, be responsible persons as described
in section 20.31 of the Act; and

(g)

a statement describing the responsible person's ability
to conduct or finance the remedial action.

names of

27

Division V — Contaminated Soil Relocation

Definitions
17.

In this Division,

"contaminated site" for purposes of section 20.81 of the Act and
this Division means a site on which contaminated soil occurs; and
"contaminated soil" for the purposes of section 20.81 of the Act
and this Division means any soil at ox from a contaminated site

that contains
(a)

any substance with a concentration greater than or

equal to any of those concentrations of substances in
Columns II to UI of Schedule 6, or
(b)

special waste.

)IjIjjl o
P(I

fsm~ll',-"

—

— .'-'-:

elis'...:

APR 13 1ggg

Illa

0

iuiw

~

~s

s Rim(imaiallig i m

~II+)g(II

AI ISIRS

— —

—

'umsy Imli IjJQLI115 II (juju:: "- @
—
s, ~ isa
al( ji(I)(i &a
—

j,ggaaM)II

q

~

mlilss'a~ — ~

s,y ~
(1 [1)(

=:*

g~s

'8Desll~s ~

II

I...'„.','I »~~ ((I i)(J'~&i&z I,., '"ii 1)|jj[jgljiN &III(
gJ Is ga(

fiji)wile, s&sip
7g
iameggg — '"--'-~m:: ' ~'QIUIHN~ ~

I [)Ii
Ki

—

28

Disposal of non-contaminated soil

Secti ons 3(1.1) and (1.2) of the Act do not apply to soil
which is not contaminated soil.
18.

Soil Relocation without a contaminated soil relocation agreement
19.(1) Where a site is authorized for landfill waste disposal,
in any of the ways referred to in section 20.81 (5)(a),(b) or (c)
of the Act, but the authorization does not expressly indicate
that contaminated soil is acceptable for deposit in the landiill,
contaminated soil is authorized for deposit in the landfill
without a contaminated soil relocation agreement, provided that

wan

(a)

if the site will be used for agricultural land use, the
concentration of any substance in the contaminated soil
must not be greater than or equal to the concentration
of that substance specified in Column II of Schedule 6,

~h

(b)

.

if the site will be used for urban park land use, the
concentration of any substance in the contaminated soil

S

I

I'l

)

IIIIiiI))
i!SIN!.'.Sell~'-:s

NISI)88~~~~

~ISSIi -=.—..=: )pig)/~SIIWIII&~I 8 +i

I

I I I%

I)I

IIIsI~~— -'„'-=Is )iiI

"

=:.mani'l',, "~~z z=--'-~m~:—,~II~ '&m."':-=-': — =I@ I(IIIIII== --

a

L~

29

must not be greater than or equal to the concentration

of that substance specified in Column III of Schedule
6r

(c)

if the site will be used for commercial land use, the
concentration of any substance in the contaminated soil
must not be greater than or equal to the concentration
of that substance specified in Column V of Schedule 6,

(d)

if the site will be used for industrial land use, the
concentration of any substance in the contaminated soil
must not be greater than or equal to the concentration
of that substance specified in Column VI of Schedule 6,
or

(e)

if the site will be used only for waste disposal, the
concentration of any substance in the co& taminated soil
may be greater than or equal to the concentration of
that substance specified in Column'VI of Schedule 6,
but the contaminated soil must not contain special
waste other than in accordance with the Special Waste
Regulation,

NIHIL'sa

and provided that approval in principle has been issued for the
contaminated site from which the soil is being relocated.

WIL" l
II5 ---.—
!)RANI II1
III) IF% 5
) hl

I

I

I

ioiaN aei

gal

~ 8

ss., v)ig

'll

gsaml',j 4
) IN(R

P

I

1

Q

.

I~+a

I

.';;-;;

===
I

j~1 ee ~

.'=,,
IJ,;;
—

"'~~HIIIIIIH

—

'III I~
ll51I

—

)

N

APR 13 igg4

'mnisigaisl

—

I

g
II

~

—

I

M

""',;j;'i==.

(s1%II ppN

JJ

II I

gag NINmjsII In~

N'i:=..:ii i..&'

--=:,PNI
Nil~'illlh"'I==

= „Ni '

Lmlkm&esimaismmai~~

11
)

~
(IIII~'l=l F''"'"
=

~~

Ijn

-- i',~~- .-.'~lli&'ii)iSa

30

Subsection ( 1) does not authorize deposit of contaminated
soil with the concentration of any substance greater than or
(2)

equal to the concentration of tnat substance specifically
prohibited in any authorization given under the Act.
Subsection ( 1) does not prevent an owner of a site for which
an authorization has been given under the Act from refusing to
accept any type of contaminated soil.
(3)

Application for a contaminated soil relocation agreement
20. (1) An application for a contaminated soil relocation
agreement shall be made using the form set out in Schedule 8.
(2)

The

(a)

applicant. in subsection (1) shall
complete and sign Part 1 of the form in Schedule 8,

-''JP ~'::,
',,~
NISI/)ss~

4m i&ia

$

11

+ ''
'

'

—

'm) Pl I@QQ/$

N

p&&

"'g~+~
g

—

—,',g

~

~ll

asm m) R

.~~

e~

a

(

(l

(W(f j)l: =:=-

('11 11(~s88I&g f+ &,
)N[
~%/8NNm s ass
a6 gf'

—

$ '@j~g '~N
'.gg
~

8! II

~

lQSHSSE Sl

(

Ql

I

II

8I

I

~; ~
=

~

APR 4 3 1S94

g!!

llR~IH
iM

i ~iailiiie
Q/[I

RIB

,

='= ==:='- -'-i:.'==~= == —:—

11!

'I

IillSI
ISSKIR

==,"alllll,,'Ill%i

32

manager before or concurrent with issuance of the contaminated

soil relocation agreement.
Before soil relocation begins pursuant to a contaminated
soil relocation agreement, the applicant under section 20 must
ensure that notice from a manager as required under section
20.81(9) of the Act has been received by
(2)

(a)

the municipality from which the soil is removed, and

(b)

the municipality in which the receiving site is

situated.
Sections 3(1.1) and 3(1.2) of the Act do not apply to the
deposit of contaminated soil made pursuant to a contaminated soil
relocation agreement. under section 20.81(2) of the Act, provided
the contaminated soil does not contain any special waste, other
than in accordance with the Special Waste Regulation.
(3)

Wl
IIII I I

M I'

IPIR I

jiiell
NS'I

PR,araea

~%5)

%II

e ljllkl

Il III%5,

,

II l,lHIJ J
1I SIII I I II

I I I I !'II RIRR
I IF:— I R
I

I

-

I

,'ll~

)

'

e

— — %IS~

'RRI 8
I

pppp I

~ ~
I I I R I!I

ISI IR ~iII Rill

P

I" ")ar,;

Pimp

~P

--! M s m! i

33

Numerical standards for contaminated soil relocation agreements

22.(1) For the purpose of section 20.81(3)(a) of the Act, the
numerical standards in Schedule 6 for the applicable land uses at
the location of deposit apply.
(2)

Where the use of the site receiving the contaminated soil is

not described by any of the land uses in Schedule 6, a manager
may designate which standards in Schedule 6 apply.

Risk based standards for contaminated soil relocation agreements

23.(1) For the purpose of section 20.81(3)(b) of the Act, the
risk based standards of section 5 of this regulation apply.
requirements as part of a contaminated
soil relocation agreement where risk assessment has been used to
evaluate site conditions, including those fox
(2)

jIIIPI ml',3
!

A manager may include

i&iiii ~3)fll

Illlm l
ie II
I

1m 14
III

i

I

I

a monitoring plan relative to impacts of the substances
in the contaminated soil to be deposited,

L)% !

IRI ml

14 II
~ ~
I
I

I

(a)

II I ~ I

I

I

ie

gI

~ ~"
~

Iv 44 4 ~ 4

asm

~ 14

I

" I 44I
'

5

I Ii R s
44 ~
M 514 ISI
I
I

I
I

I

~I

44am I e4 e 4
I

4'

~I(¹!=

,—:-=„i!

— = 4 ~ 4 4RPI sn14
=

-'m(

— - — -44r 4smim
!

ii

'

ic!

N45g (!m!gygg

UihH I@L lcm

m44

Iiiilll~

—

I

~

APR ) 3 )S94
II I

,m4~ L,
14~lma444

s ~ 4 s4
4

~

I':.:

a

4

'im ISW I

— —~~~

iII i()!

¹

.

R ss
14

A %111

III

11/iIII

.--~'W

III 4 . --- -='=
~

~ 444 4 41

41

'I sIMI$ %

iSIIwl

I

=..344 ~ 4NNN

i~i ~ ~mi

isN
I

i

j

(

(

I

(jjg

35

Division VI — Remediation Approval and Completion
Approval in Principle

responsible person may apply for an approval in
principle under section 20.71(1) of the Act by completing and
submitting to a manager the form set out in Schedule 9 and
attaching or ensuring a manager already has
24. (1)

A

(a)

copies of all preliminary and detailed site
investigation reports prepared under section 20.2(1) of

the Act,

I
IIIV'am

copies of any additional site investigation reports
prepared under 20.2(3) of the Act, and

(c)

a remediation plan.

Before issuing an approval in principle under section
20.71(1) of the Act, a manager may request any additional
informatiori and reporting the manager considers necessary to
assess whether standards in sections 4 and 5 are likely to be
complied with when a remediation plan has been implemented.
(2)

mawI f

Imiil
~~ml
Il~ilq
Ilail

(b)

issuing an approval in principle for a site which is to
be remediated according to prescribed numerical standards of

ll IL') (

(3)

I!ls 'sH'I

Tii7hen

Ii

iiS

I II/
!n S 11
IS

))I!

s!Ii!SII!I'I'

l'

APR 1 3 1gg4

llI'lNP

)I SI sms )I)~

ale lel

I

~ ~ aiss» I~S
S

S IS Ss

l! I Ss — -"

s~" "SSmi
S~~
S SI

~

S! I I I ~ SS I SSSI ~

~

SS ~

— -- Iw %54s s:.——

(c) preparation,
discharge of a restrictive covenant under section 2I5
of the Land Title Act if reguired where risk assessment
and risk management requirements have been set under

subsection (3)(b)i

ga

.,

m sa ~ m
e

.'IT
illa'„fjll

'm ~
zppIIKI

~lf

~

a%1 8

mmlggjml

= — -.=me

pnl~lllllg($
'

I

h

L

.

,

C=

1gg+~ %immi

~

37

(d)

carrying out confirmatory sampling and analysis after
treatment or removal of contamination, and

(e)

any security required by a manager relating to
implementing the remediation plan or to managing the
contamination at the site for the purpose of any or all

of

ensuring that a responsible person completes
remediation or guarantees performance to the
satisfaction of the manager,

(ii)

providing funds to further treat, remove, or
otherwise manage contamination, and

(iii)

complying with applicable legislation and

financial management and operating policies
of the province.
(4)

When issuing an approval in principle for a site which is to

be remediated according to prescribed risk based standards and
I

( IN( I III

prescribed environmental impact requirements of section 5, a
manager may, in accordance with section 20.71(1)(c) of the Act,
specify conditions which may include but need not be limited to

1I

'liiii)jj
') RUI II 5)j

It'll [
iiii/I

m iiiimi)/I

) II

~

jiii jl

I Sist

iI%11%i

ISRI
mmIR~ I'
~Isa&
N)i i~j;.':-—
— —~el I%II
M.
-—
gg )jj) 9~II
slussN

I ImaiaIIii

I:

e~l

—

~/)

'ss

APR 0 3 1994

pclw'msNmM Ml Mi
5

I

S

smllaaagNj)y~ (

-~~ — — ~~ssNII~

s&g())/~s

.

su IssCS IIIIB)g gfj g 'INI QI

-'''+$ (jNjy&as" ''~iiLaml
'

38

matters related to items in a remediation plan, or to
(a)

notifying owners of adjoining properties
from or to whose property contamination may
have migrated, and
who may be directly affected by remediation

providing information about investigations which have
occurred, contamination occurring on the site, and
planned remediation procedures and schedules,
(b)

registering a restrictive covenant under section 215 of
the Land Title Act under section 25 of this regulation,

(c)

testing and monitoring to evaluate the quality and
performance of risk management measures, on completion
of remediation in accordance with the remediation plan,
and

() ) II INII 85)

Ul ll

~

NNN)/I%+I%I

~(l M 5 R I
I

)

I

1Al

Il IRII I@I

(d)

any security required by a manager relating to
implementing the remediation plan or to managing the

contamination at the site for the purpose of any or all

8

39

ensuring that a responsible person completes
remediation to the satisfaction of the
manager,

providing funds to further treat, remove, or
otherwise manage contamination,

(iii)

complying with applicable legislation and

financial management and operating policies
of the province, and
(iv)

ensuring the reguired inspection, maintenance
and monitoring is continued as considered
necessary by a manager to protect the
environment or human health if the
responsible person implementing the
remediation plan or others who may become
responsible for the contamination ceases to
carry it out.

Ia s Iwl 2.

IIsIsw~
SIR 51)I

~i wss(lf
I
I !III
~,
II
~ @i

Pl

~

II IS

iIIil

! III II )

gg) IIIIII IIII

APR 13 1gg4

,Ii'iIIIIaiill.
~ I
I I

her m assI

~

Basmmsw mI

40

Restrictive Covenants
25.

A manager

may require a restrictive covenant under section

215 of the Land Title Act for the purpose of any or all of

(a)

giving notice to any affected parties of the
location and nature of contamination being
managed at the site,

setting conditions regarding works and their
inspection and maintenance at the site,
considered necessary to secure the
contamination at the site and to protect the
environment and human health in the long

term,
(c)

restricting disturbance of soils or
sediments, or changing use of a site which
would invalidate a risk assessment and
potentially increase exposure of users of the

site to contamination,
(d)

~ 1411

4~

4 ~ 14

lIL)(a~I

IIi,'~I
~sm
I ~ ~ 4:

Sl ~ ~ ~ 11
~ R ~ I

~ mal

~

4
1144)4)()
I

spec'iying monitoring requirements or an
acceptable monitoring plan to allow
determination of unacceptable movement or
impacts of contamination,

41

(e)

indemnifying the Crown or its agents or
employees from losses, charges, actions or

suits related to contamination remaining a

site, and
providing procedures and criteria for final
discharge of a covenant

if these purposes are unlikely to be satisfactorily met by
(g)

entry of notations in the site registry, and

(h)

specifications or conditions in a conditional

certificate of compliance.

Certificates of Compliance

Ilail

person may reguest a certificate of compliance under
section 20.71(2) of the Act by completing and submitting a
application to an manager in the form set out in Schedule 10 and
26.

A

attaching or ensuring a manager already has
lL(I)iiI
„;==
'

I
IR

'II

=II/g
I II

IlsmssII

APR 13

19'

ic::."Alllf
IF.&~SI'I~i

lligiL,"-.l

Conditional Certificates of Compliance
27. A person may request a conditional certificate of compliance
under section 20.71(3) of the Act by completing and submitting an
application to a manager on the form set out in Schedule 11 and
attaching or ensuring a manager already has

(a)

information on confirmatory sampling and analyses, if
any, cazzied out after remediation including
a description of sampling locations and
methods used,

(ii)

a schedule of sampling conducted, and

results suitably summarized and evaluated, of
field observations and of field and
laboratory analyses carried on confirmatory
samples,
(b)

ki

!

)$ %

information on testing and monitoring to evaluate the
quality and performance of risk management measures, on
completion of remediation in accordance with the
remediatioz. plan, and

5I l1il IIII
8 i1BZI

liRI'NT

~ml ell!
es

II

IS I4I

R I II

II

II

I

Vial iI

APR 13 1994

I

4&e444I ~ ~

l

I

III l5fi Il
~ II% Fll

WW IIII
4m ~
lsSIW
~
I

IJJI

«'

I

~

«~4i4 SS 415 IIIIgll
14'
I

I ~

qi

I II

«4

~I ~

I

-44)g4i44)l) ii4 lleilig

wl I il ee4 44
II ~ I

4%« U

I

'4

% ~

II ~

I

~

I

II ~

''I

.

~

«UUU II ~ Ill 4
I II U

44

information on compliance with all conditions set by a
manager under subsection 24(4) if an approval in
principle was issued prior to remediation.

(c)

Security as a Condition of a Certificate
28.(1) If security is a condition of any approval in principle
under subsection 24(4)(d), all terms of the security reqilirement
shall be met before a. manager may issue a certifica e of
compliance or a conditional certificate of compliance.

If a manager requires sl =arity accordance with section
20.71(2)(b) of the AI , before a manager issues a certificate of
compliance or a conditional certificate of compliance, a
responsible person shall provide
(2)

NR!f!Ilj'iam

iigil
w ~ S4

~

satisfactory evidence of the availability to a manager
of the required security, and

(a)

I SSI I SE
I

jRjiiiji IL

~

IF

l

JRl'ill/(
( If% I I

es
I

I

~~

I

N I P l I imp

I

I

))

A) I 'Ulm

llfiNIP

I!)II K
!8

5''gf.J%lfl

Slsll811 lip
SS411 I l

~'

14 4SI

la el

I

'l

II!II!I
I I

'l l

'

lf'
l0

I

I

I I I

I

I

I

s

I-sle S','
III IKI 8 j

(::

'''I

l 14l 111$ l ~ S4
I

4 I4 '8S4 I SS
m Ils'
I

I

I

I

,

IS S
I

: I

I:

~
II

I

4
— —.- Illnlll
~I

s,'"'
.-

ISS Sl

IS ~ II I

II IS

Ill

4

41

IS I
I

ILI

4'i
I

~I

~

Sl

41SSlh llllS

ss ii

'S M
I

~

':

44„-—

I
I

I II I I I

l

~

44 ~ 4:

.—.

i II%144
4

4 Ill

I

I

I I

Il

551'IIII'u

III

Il

:8

~ I

—.4" '

S

)

5,,„'.-.-",'-:jl S ~ ssII ~

i;...,

i iil

I

I

li i ll

'I

F4

illa
I '4
I

I

I

I

I

" 'Si f
I

I

j

a)

II 1 I I1 H ss

provrde to the registrar information on the part of a
site to which the approval in principle, certificate of
compliance or conditional certificate of compliance

III 'WIII

lii'I 1BI

IRP li 'I

IH S1 IS f I

I

I

!ill IIII

II

I

I8

applies, and

I 'Ll I I
I %Ill

)I)i

(b)

11K I

FiI

I

II% 'I

II I

"'

II

IIIIM

IIIII

I~l

I
I

4 III ~'I SSeI
4 I fl 4
II»
ii
l)lll
~ I

I I I

I

I

consider whether a restrictive covenant under section
215 of the Land Title Act is required to ensure that
any part or parts not remed'ated will be remediated.

IlIl( 'll

I

3 I'l It

I

I

II

t

iI1

'
I 'LI

III/l

III

I

I

lu

APR ) 3 SS4

RPI.ni

I

Ill'I''I I'i I;

S 'S IS I

~ I

esl5 II
'

I

~I

SS

S~S

ll~,

~

IsP'IS
'

al II
I

II

~

4

s
,

4 I'I

~ .

I

illk'

W~I SI
I

S

';
I

I

-4I S

II

-M IS I

I

II' ~ I

SS

—

lPI1

s

s
'

SI IS
~ ~

I I

I, II

~ ISS

IS

Is

I

I

S

I kiI

III
I

'Sl'

I.

Rill( l,

SIEI

II

I IIIII

III

I

HSI S IIP ill

jl!'g!Ãiw

I
I

I

li RIIR''

PIN

I

P,ill!

I

I

Ill'I

F! I!i i
I

[]

P ~ IP

IPI Hj
II I PP

I

P IN

R'==

'!I!"::":

.: '.-'.;.-

IIIII IIII ~ 5 JP P PhRk'

$$

SIR I

I

allll IIS IPIBl
»
=.- — plsjpm~lPPIIIISIw Jl'a IIP'P Ml P

~

ai
m I

I

W

I

P

IP

III

'I

III'8

~ I~&

~

I~

mime

1181!

P
I!

,

-I

P

~ g4 1, I 1
I

!gg

PP NIL

~

P

-: 'jR)IUII

(e)

IiIII, II)l III(

I R Rl
IS IP I IA
SS P SS

certificates of compliance, and

I

~

(f) conditional certificates of compliance.

i::ml(
(3)

i(i,!;,"„,

Mhere methods, protocols or procedures have been approved by

the director under subsection (1) or (2), only those methods,

L%)I SI, ) I)

I

Il I jI)hj 7 s ——
I

(IS
/ S e~

''ISS
I

~

~ 111"

1111 es lmsjs g
.III11~—

~

~

~

APR) 3 SQ
—..

—

IS I ~ I

7 7

II
~~]I

I

I

~ S'.

'IS PI

%II

771 Sl je 'pl 7 7&-

,'1~[stem

S:.'

ll'',
7

1

I1

I

Jl

IS SS
~

s

I

I

I

P

'I ~

''I ~ 7 I I

'11 ~ ''
~7

II

=-: j'

1

I

~

WW

ii;iliil

'

:. ~ Sl I
I

j)s jm

:

=='milhl

I

$

51

litle
g'IIR ill!l/
t!,Iiiiilli'll

II„IJI~lj

1

'N

I

NS ISN IIS

III'151

ILII '.!

IN ~ NN

': ...:==!;;;,

=II, L&'ill

NN

Ihll .
l

leam

IB
III.—.—

II

ayaI!r fl

WSNI ill

I
:;=,'-s!ir jjjliiii 51',.'!

I'!jgi
m~ ''~
'; '~N.

'''-IlllllSS

-lsss~~gggjg gg/I11!!Ilail

I

=m ~ R
N

~ N

I~

S!INN I I lll!$

%11 ..

~

I

S

IN

ISSIN

JlliNI

llllll J+1@/

Schedule 6
Soil Numerical Standardst
Mazimum Acceptable Concentrations of Substances iu Soil

COLUMN

COLUMN

I

B
Agricultural

Substance

COLUMN IB

COLUMN IV

COLUMN

COLUMN

V

Residential
(RL)

Commercial

Vl
Industrial

(AL)

Urban Park
(PL)

(CL)

()L)

20
20
750
4

20
30
500
4

20
30
500
4

40
50

2000

40
50
2000

8

8

5
8

20

20

250
50

800
300
500

800
300

i
I

Inorganic Substances
antimony
arsenic
barium
beryllium
boron (hot water soluble)

2

cRdnuunl

3

5

chromium (+6)
chromium (total)
cobalt
copper

8

8

750
40

250
50
100

150

cyanide (f'ree)
cyanide (tomU
Quoride (total)

0.5

10

10

5

50
400
500

50
400
500
2

200
375
0.8

lead
mam!ay

molybdenum
nickel
selenium
silver
sulphur (elemental)

100

2

500

100
500

100

2000

500
2000

1000

1000

10

10

40
500

40
500

5

10

10

150
2

100

100

3

3

10

10

20
500

20

20

40

40

5

50

200
600

200
500

50
200
500

1500

1500

5
10
10
10
10

5
10
10
10
10

50
50
30
50

50
50
30
50

1

Monocyclic Atumatfc

Hydrocarbons
benzene
cblorobenzene

0.5

0.5

1

1

1

1

1,3dichlorobcnzenc
1,4&chlorobcnzene

0.05
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1

1

1

1

1

ethylbenzene
styrene
toluene
xylene

0.1
0,1
0.1
0.1

5
5

5
5

Reich)orobenzenc

15 11%

3

5

'

a II RR

.IIIII

)ail!Ilk

APR 1 h 1994

a
IR ~ I m ~

Rmllll %

III+I un I

a
~ ~

~ ~

,IS tRI I

I

Rl

I

I

~

I

'ms

nm W
I

l

r~tns ~~~ ms
I(PIIRRI II ~ I

.

I''ll

1

3

5

O IIII II RK:

1

i"

—~ +SR

Il iIRIra

'
IRIR) [lII
nlUi
~ I Im

mR

~,

p InnI
Iaur n

I

I

'l

~s I
i

'

~mt..., u Ill i

~I'

II Rat

I II

~ I

I

~ E

ssta li

''- '-

Sojji Numerical Staudardst
Maximum Acceptable Concentrations of Substances io Soil
COLUMN

COLUMN BI

II

COLUNIN IV

I
Substance

Agricultural

Urban Park
(PL)

Residential
(RL)

COLUMN

(AL)

Phenolic Substances
non-chlorinatedt (each)
chloropheuols'each)

0.1

1

1

0.05

0.5

0.5

COLUMN
V
Commercial
(CL)

'I
1

COLUMN

Industrial
OL)

10
5

10

10
10
10
10
10

10
10
10
10
10

5

Polycyclic Aromatic

Hydrocarboas
(PAHs)
bonzo(a)sathracene
benzo(a)pyrene
bonzo(b)fluoranthene
benzo(k) fluoranthene
dibenz(a,h)anthracene

0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1

indeno(1,2,3-c,d) pyrene

0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1

naphthalene

phenanthrene
pyre no

1

1

10

10

5

5
5
10

50
50
100

50
50
100

50

50

10
10

10
10

5
10

Chlorinated
Hydrocarbons
chlorinated aliphatics
(each)
chlorobeuzenes (each)
hexachlorobenzene
hexachlorocyclohexane
PCBs
PCDDs and PCDFst
eous Organic
Substances
nonwhlorinated aliphatics
(each)
phthahc acid eaters (each)
tlutnoline
thioohcne

0.1

0.05
0.05
0.01
0.5
0.00001

2

2
2

2

50

5

5

0.001

0.001

0,3

30
0.1
0.1

I

'JI8 tntltt
j

11n&sets&asti

j

I

ijjjlssllina
mu
~

I

IIiIHjl Ra

ls'.
lj, — ..

Ml

Hj'1H'ggglljllliisaiss ~™
-

Iltltht t III;z - "„,
I

—

t

~jtdt='-.=-.-- tjmtw8ljlS;;~~
~

e..., ...u us'g)H)jjnjl j; jjii 2;; jl

g jgjg

~

"3N

l:~i(I)gjah,—---

Ilmua t ~ m

= 1111

'

3 I'I jI
jgl

i

I

ul

Il Ij

Kw ~ s

JLst naos

Soil Numerical Stalsdardst

Maximum Acceptable Conceatrations of Substances in

Soil

ertvise stated

stances include

rtho, meta, para)
-, 2,4; 3,5; 2,3-, 3,4-)
2,3,6-, 2,4,5-, 2,3,5v 2,3,4-, 3,4,5-)

ns iaclude

dichlomethene (1,1-, 1,2-)
-dichloropropene (cis and trans)
tetrachloroethene

,2-) trichlomethene

48. 1254 and 1260.
2,3,7,8-TCDD equivalents. NATO International Toxicity
Equivalency Factors (1-TEFS) for
s and PCDFs are as follotrs:

ner

TKP

D
CDD

0.5

Con aener

1.0

I4CDD

2,3,7,8-T4CDF
2,3,4,7,8-P5CDF
1,2,3,7,8-P5CDF
42,3,4,7,8-HSCDF
1,2,3,7,8,9-HSCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HSCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-14CDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HrCDF

0.1
0.1
0.1
0.01

14CDD
14CDD
HtCDD

TEP

0.001

0.1
0.5
0.05
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.01
0.01
0.001

42,3,4,7,8,9-HrCDF
01CDF

I I

~

I~ J
I

e

I

Se ~ Ir 11 al I Ial I

I

iil I 8

—,,as IIII ~

Ssu 8

lg ji js a
ml a a IaaI ~ 4
mls m N85g[ml jl
'I

j

~ ~~

18 I Pmm tats

I

I
am w SKaaan
sata
- — -nnslls» Iii i
~

I

I I I 1a

~ Innl Si

e a I ns

li

III~ list ansfl~

g gi~gat
I

~

M
a~I

'aams~tll rmlnl

S S I

~ ~

a ~ a I a al ~ 111

'

5

@~II

m1a la IllsjRI

ne

SISS

4155

II

N

Stllm

n(jap I1841gg

[RiIW
ns

~

el 1 I I

30

10
100

200

loooss ta,3000tn

50 000

1OO

Sooos

Monocyctic Aromatic
Hydrocarbons

300"
700"

ethylbe ozone
toluene
xvlenea

g,l!I@I
~al

5
2.4s
24s
300s

300

I

~11m i lit[
inn'n mal
f

:I i;

—.;;,.

I
iI

gpHI
SP+ B 4

!sm

I&Ill ~ laa
i

III

I

I

~

n,alas iill llggII1 giatM! atg

sass S ~ Il I ml I
~'~ ~'~
lsaiiam"=
~

FIR

— =,=.-"..".."-""=—:==
~

I

am ~
I

'-'

'-

II

5
~aaaaa
aa

~

ar

~"~!III
~~

APR 1 3 199tt

~ ~ ami~

~

%%11 RI 5 ants 4K
Imp!I!I! g
as
Ilaastalia sasIIaatnl! ai4 RN85mhlslll11!I tnaa siittsIII
mlglgIas sm ~ g I I! l gi))r
I!l~igi ~ iiii s ~ as a~!m!'! 1&iI!Ii Ii lip!Pi IRr~! l IIIsa
Is
'"'s nasa'hassesgjj ij Iil ll lQJ@i 1 Iis i~iila a an i i I m 'I !!! 11ir
'

IIIII)I!'is s

—

I

s

Water and Groundwater Numerical Standardst
ble Coacentrations of Substances iu Surface Water aud Groundwater

COLUMi'1 11

COLUMN III

COLUMN IV

Freshwater

COLUMN V

O

Drinking

Aquatic

Irrigattona'IW)
Life'FW)

Livestock*
lLW)

7
0.2

Water'DWI

90014'0.35 14
515 25.15

18
1

ippls 15,16

0.5

60; 305

0.01

5

50
0.1
0.01

260
20

50

15

2.5
2.5
4
0.9

5; 15

0.5
0.65
0.1
0.1
0.15
0.03
0.0065
0.00115

5

350

WL
SWRC —,—
p uu

an~~Ill ne ieeM~w

I

-.~l75
P/I~IIli

1

i+kgt ..g=,~s~~gt~, gt«t,i,jg~li

j

0.6
0.2

DEHP
other phthaiate eaters

s

~

I~~ ljs&jiigplllne

Pace~a,nm

~nl

I.

naca

e~j'Sill~'"",

Surface Water and Groundwater Numerical Standardsl
Maximum Acceptable Concentrations of Substances in Surface Water aad Groundwater

COLUMN I

COLUMN H

Freshwater
Aquatic
Life'FW)

Substance

COLUMN ill

COLUMN lV

COLUMN V

Irrigationxs
QW)

Livestock'-

Drinking
Water"

fLWt

iDW)

X'esticidcs

aldicstb

9

aldrin snd dieldsiu

0.004

atzazinc
aainpbos-methyl
bendiocstb

2

0.7
60
20
40
I

bremoxynil

carbsryl
carbofursn
chlordane

1.75

0.006

chlotpyrifos

cyanszinc
2„4-D

DDT

90
90
7
90

2

10

4
0.001

100
301s
20
120

diazinon
dicatubs
diclofop-methyl
dimethoste

9
20
70

distuat
dinron
endosulisa

150

0.02

endxin
glyphosste
heptacblur 6?. heptuchlor epoxide

0.0023
65
0.01

280
3

lindane

4

malathion

190

methoxycblor
metoluchlur
metribuzin

900
50
80
10
50

paraqust
pazathion

pherate
piclomn

29

2
190

simazinc

10

2,4,5-T

280; 20s

temephos
I

texbufos
tostaphcnc

I

0.008

triallatc

230
45

triQurulin

~

Sit,it ~1

APR 13 5g4 ',

lm saul

g-'~

g g~lll1III

I

p/I@la'~+nz'~tttuiQ

,'IjjilgglggtaSRI SRI~ ~~'.~iia

Surface Water and Groundwater Numerical Standardsi
Mazimum Acceptable Coacentrations of Substances in Surface Water aud Grouudwater
COLUMN I

COLUMN II

COLITMN III

COLUMN IV

Irtigatio '.

Substance

Freshwater
Aquatic Life
(FWI

Livestock"
(LWl

&

Watert
fDWI

Substances

tsvccstum

50 Bqld

's'iodine

10 Bq//'
Bq/r'0

radium
sostrontium

mm~lll

Drinking
'IW

I'adiologica

'OLUMN V

ttlit tun

Bq/c'000

Bo//

'M mlI

semI,
I

jl'ijl I II

I 'IN
I--)

~I

musgla

ulm II

IK

III I'll

IIu

II

II i IIII
sl 1st t

s

&Ii

f

sel/

iiii

il

I '%a

'll'I Ij

I Ili

m/u l~ iii
~r

~

jrm
I,jt tt ii
I

II

I

I

II

iii

IIR

II I/
i

I l

I

II

sit

i

jf
Ir

I

I

s
~l
I

~

I

Ig
s
~I

II
~ I

II

uv i

- i.tr

I

I ~ l.

~ 'I

a

Surface Water and Groundwater Numerical Standardst

Maximum Acceptable Concentrations of Substances in Surface Water aud G oundwater

Foam ates

'Ali values in pg/f unless othertvlse stated.
PStandards for heavy metals and trace iona are for total concentrations in unfiltered samples. Groundwater monitoring
samples must include both dissolved (field filtered and fixed) and total determinations.

'Applies to ufigation of all soil types.
JDrinkiog water standards are for unfiltered samples obtained at the point of consumption. Heavy metals, metalloids and
inorganic iona are expressed as total concentrations (partilculate and dissolved) unless otherwise indicated.

'Standard is set on the basis of aesthetic considerations. Consult Director for further advice.
'Standard varies tv) th pH, calcium, and dissolved organic carbon concentrations. Consult Director for funher advice.
PStandard changes with temperature and pH. Consult Director for further advice.

'Standard changes wiN hardness. Consult Director for further advice.
PStandard varies depending on crop. Consult Director for fiutber advice.
Iefiquivalent to 10.0 mg/H nitrate as nitrogen. where nitrate and nitrite are determined separately, levels of nitrite should not
exceed 4.5 mg/6 (1.0 mg/f as nitrogen).

"Refer to Canadian Water Quality Guidelines.

i'""'I

PPNon-chlorinated phenolic substances include

2,4-dimethylphenol

''III'

/ I

'sStandard changes with pH. Consult Director for further advice.

2,4~tmphenol

RIP I ~ Iw

V,I'LL@&9
4 ili

2-methyl 4,6~trophenol
nitropbenol (2-, 4-)
phenol
crcsol

"Determiuation of dichlorophenols to bc reported as 2,4-dichlorophenoh

W IIII

"Determination of trichlorophenols to be reported as 2,4,6-trichlorophenok

mls inlltll
~ Lt

5 ll

I
i

]

I

IP

I!

I I

I

II'I
II
II
ir

alltlttta
Stills/I

lh

I

I

I

I

I "I
1

I

ul

ll
I.II%
I
~

I

I

I

'

lil 8

I

8 I III

1

Ihklm

"Determination of tetrachlorophenols to be reported as 2,3,4,6-tetrachlorophcnob
'Pstandard for marine water is 0.01 pg/f

"includes DDT mctabolites.

IIIIIIII

'PStandard for intermiuent application an cmps.

teStandard for continous application on crops.

i

(i

"Standard applies where dietary intakes or nahua lcvcls are high. Consult Director for further advtce.

I

standard varies with type of livestock. Consult Dhector for further advice.
g I
c

I

i

APR 13 1994

PP

:

.'l Il

'%
1

Pt

PPI I I

=:uli

I

I

~I
6 ~
IP

i

tl ll I'I g
I

tl

il rl ~ III

st
1
Pi

,,i
~

i

11 PI

I

I

I

:Ill I'

I

PI J

II

II%

II&

liam

III

Ii

aIa

"- I'oRT

I~II

KiII

Cocci

EPC
February 22, 1994

L.T. Hubbard, Director
Industrial Waste dc
Hazardous Contaminants Branch
Environmental Protection Division
B.C. Environment
777 Broughton Street
Victoria, B.C.
V8V lX5

Dear Mr. Hubbard;

5gBJECP

CONTAMINATED SXTftS LmtJSLATJGN AND REGIJLATJANS P

TO THB WASTE MANAHBMEbH'MENDMENT ACT 1903 AEILL

It has come to our attention that your department is currently r
Ministry's legislation and regulations regarding contaminated sites.

I i111g
II
I5'I
I I
I

&

gIIRHI

mt&11
CahlBI

~

(j
a......ma

As you are aware. the issue of contaminated soils affects local gov
only as owners of potential contaminated sites, but also as administrators of such si
boundaries.

Of particular interest to the City's Environmental Protection Comnu
issue of "contamination levels" currently being applied in determining haz
materials.

lt would be appreciated if you could advise if the Ministry proposes t
of the present B.C. Criteria concentration leveis as part of this review.

iiiiIIIN
~ iaisll

i
j

Thank you in advance for taking the time to respond to our request.
Yours truly,

Rl 'a lag]

il

s

J. E. Yip, P. Eng.
Deputy City Engineer
a&tel u

s

JEY:cd

sir am~&
IIti
II
IIFs Itulsa
I

I

15
I 5

s

I

t I

APR 1 4 1994

IIst s'il
'ssl ~ ~

'
I

I

l

II

I

5

IILII I 1

IIIII

srl4
dI'=

=

R II
I

I

alP '
%S

I

III ~

I II ~

~

I

~i

BC'aaasrr«ADQSEssEs:

EnwTortmcrit

G.

!nunc«an or

«r ane .

.

Srancn
Tern«eel Serneea aaa saeaal are«lee seeaaa
n'n"
11SS.117SOOVSaesaaer
'." a
Vaaarla. S.C. VSV rXS

+ ...'::

rats«hares (SS4) Mr4992

,

.

I.

«S r.

eguiation - DRAFT Part 1
the DRAFT Part 1 Contaminated Sites Regulation
ement ATnmdment Act, 1993 (Bill 26).

had the following document attached:

ion Plan for the ContaTninated Sites Regulation
«'+ a-,.
ct. In* accordance 'with the plan, the'RAFT: v-'y 1
m three (3) parts with the foUowing targets:

II'I II

111111

II

an I I I IIIJ Il
I

g

IHI&» I
) Ii I

I

a

I

N aa I

lli i!I as i ~ X
gl!SINAI

I

)IIII I'III
'el

I O'Iii Iii
IT1I'I as ~ I

I

f

'lIn

e I.'I

1

I

I

The purpose of chstnbutxon of the DRAFT Regulation in th; parts is primarily to
provide as much time as possible for review, comment, di -sion, and revtiion as
necessary. 'Review can therefore proceed concurrent with adnued preparation of
subsequent parts.'e recogtuze the interaction between -... m and the need for- ":Ia«
'eview of the regulation as a whole,'o consultaIion on Parts 1 and 2 will continue
I indicated in my November 15, 1993 letter that meetings might be held to:,.',,„','I,,
~.

a

"fntrodu«'ce the content and intent of the DRAFI'egulation;

provide additional background on the Regulation; and
answer questions about the intent of the DRAFT peru!.

For tMs puipose, two (2) identical presrmtaifons on DRAFT Part 1 are being phuuusd
for early January, 1994 as follows:
January 13, 1994,? 00490pm, Vancouver - SHJ Downtown Campus (Harbour
Centre), 515 W. Hastings St, Fletcher Challenge Theatre.
~
14, 1994, 990-12:00 noon, Victoria - Laurel Point Inn, 680 Montreal St,
Salons A gs B.

'anuary

-'*

I

l

II a''
II a

I
~

I

I

I

',;+

Sl

«

Ie
I

P
I

ar

I

S

I

~

I

I

e

".'-

':::

'I''

The objective wiH'be to provide an oveivterw and answer
questions, but will not be.
to revisit policy decisions inherent in Bill 26. Participants wiH not be
expected to
provide their detailed comments or views at these meetings but will be
welcome to.
provide preliminary comments if they wish.
i.-

Written comments on DRAFT Part l,.oi submissions on any portion of 8u.
proposed regulation will be welcome'atrany time, befoie or after the information
meetings.
weU, every effort will be made as time
to schedule meetings on.", ';;" „
request to discuss specific comments, suggestions or implications to spaiflc
"-'~'.-,"="",
sectors or types ot'ite. To facilitate such meetings we prefer to
meet with groups of representatives with simHar concerns. Grouping
arrangements; ',;",,:"',
you can make would be appreciated.. ""':;: '-'".;:.. '. ":
r '.::tc~
~

's

aim

':+~;.-.-'.'ndustry/interest

.. ':

i

Thank you for your continued inteiest and the time you wiH take to review the
draft regulation.

=$ .

Yo n's sincerely,

4'-'i-r ttachm

te Nr'mmdous

-.,:,,'...,

cc

.; --::.;-',:-.':::.:.:: '-~4~P; 'ilia'.= ~~;.'r4~t;Xrrvekg" p&S:~:

nts

'Dr'. J; 0'Riordan

='-': '-:-"-';:ll'itPl&c-'+4 "I.-.~'. Iir ':.:.':.-" '"4"'-

",4~Sm:
'

'":If"

ImieIirmarrII

5 II f
I

)Illii Pll'N
I Is
11s I
t Ism

IiiiIL jtp
'Wl

i 1

'

'8 II;

s'rrL
~

II

'+IS
.

1$ '1)

'

ra

I

L

'':

/

I II I rt ".

ir
lk
I

II

I

I

III

nN

air s

APR"T"3'Ij94

l II I

I\ III P

ll

ie srsr ~

PPI

l

~I

I

~ I

f

I

I

IE

~

..

4

a

r ro

I

I

I

~ I

I

I ~ I

'iai

I

p/

pip! I II

IttI

p

I

P
PI II

ilia
s

Spl Pi

/I;.I

/l'lo~
Ioj ml

School

I+ 6
V 4'ICICH

I

j~

c

I/
HCRCCRR c

T:,uocc'csCJOIR SCCC

LI:.

RUING~

HZICj

ROUI'Lcl

';~jj
YUVZH

I;) ZI
1

I

~IS(j

eS

C

. II
iir II&IN
F'jiIis iil
Ii

IliisuIl

PII i81141

jj, P'l

/I I

or IHay

Il

l

Ison Cu
AVC

II3

B II I

'

wall

Pl.

P'pic

IPI

I

I4 IW
~

I

Crt.
asgow St
O

nwood JI
a Dr.
on Avc

I

VIH1IOC'

II

I

Im .—..
4t

plS

4

.

4 Is I

%ill Ilil n P

is"

'S
—

I

I

1

II

~
I

PIC,

IS I S I

4

Illi ''

sll 4 ~

:

=UK%I ~ lsi

~

=, — 'jIIIF

II

I

I

PI

ICnl s I

II

I.JI I
1

II ~

s

It
I

'

sill

I

I II

I j44

I

I

S 4

a4P

I

=„::4 I'

s

.'J
II I ~ ~ I I 4

It

I

U

~:APR

nFFFFFn-nnn

Jll 'I 'll 4 II% ~i+Ill
.

n~
/gf'

~ Il

I

I

I

I

:~5 l

1

I

I

n'I

'I I

I

s

ii
I

&

~

I,'$4lfd

I

'Ja ll

—

—

~

I

I

lilt~:
~III

g

5I I L ~

FF

~

-" Iae a I

IIII;;,

I ll'll

l

a li
Fill

I

I II[

In I

III~

I

I

FF

-l ill SIR I

. FI

IKlI II jII

ill /'Pll

'

il i

.=.~iiail I!

Pl

I

J

!!

I%I I

I,

3 1994

mS I!!&!

~ III

'

nl q

I

,.~~!~=:=ii
~ ii~
IJW%

i,&8+AD,' Illa''Ig

1

MFnF ~ In
F

—

'

8

THE CORPORATION OF THE
CITY'F PORT COQUITLAM
MEMORANDUM
TO:

Environmental Protection Committee

FROM:

Anne T. Pynenburg
Project Technician

SUB JECT:

RECYCLING PROBLEMS AT 2446 WILSON AVIL

DATE: April 13, 1994

BACKGROUND 8t COMMENTSt
Attached is a letter sent to ETL, our recycling processor, asking that they address the issue
of
using grocery-type bags for recycling. The letter was prompted by complaints from
the
multi-unit complex at 2446 Wilson Ave. The complex has 180 units and straddles
Wilson,
At kins and Kelly Ave. The residents of the complex prefer to use opaque or non-see-through
type bags to put their recyclables in.

'nt Concerns

~Re

They have two reasons for wanting to use these type of bags:
-they find that a large percentage of seniors in the building prefer to use the smaller
bags since
they ar easier to carry the recyclables to the location for pick-up,

;un ~

-they prefer to use bags that they already have rather than purchasing bags (blue or clear
bags)
for recyclables.

While we sympathize with this complex and their particular concerns our main objective
has
been to provide a standard of service that all 11,000 single family units and 3,500
multi-family
units can utilize. The program does not work from a maintenance, cost and practical
perspective
when isolated changes to the system are made to accommodate a particular house
or unit(s).

Engineering Concerns
-if we auow the use of non-see-through bags at this location then other residents
wishing to use.
another type of bag or container will have to be accommodated also,

I'III
stwe st
——
I'-/ y iiilIl

-there will be confusion for the garbage collectors and the recycling collection staff
if the
materials at curbside are not clearly garbage OR recycling,

11

laical

1

68 I w
I

kit ,'M

Isla ls on III

lII lip

I

I

~s

~ III ~

continued.........Pg.2

IIIia,...~l
pl

f

IIIII! iiiaiIIi

rg—

Ig':.:II
t

viIlpifiI

:'„:',t t s~inai Ii.

tel ling assn"""'
5 RS
~

till I Ill
p n

'„',%5
RS

I'hH

I~I'"'

APR

~

II

4

t r-;

via'' '''

ll I

I

I

II ..
z& i

b

sii

&

= Ital
BI1I ~

6
s:. ~ EII)
.,

it
~

&

-

i

I

3 1ggtI
II II%III

I tsil II gIiHI ta
s) ljj l

4

I II ~ llllli)
now a
&

~ l~

'

i

Ils,I
HC IF

0 I

Ien

%XI~ ~ 1%
=

'=.'

-" '

I

la ~

I e I I II

~ v sg J I i j Is j

I ~ ~
h

i

a~

~

lr i ~'81 llllsat ~

lw nasuuaw

I

III~

RSttpjt

Recycling 2446 Wilson

Page 2

-we have tried in the past to have our pmcessor accept bags other than the see-through iype wdh
no positive results. Their concern is that if this is allowed the contamination level will increase
and the end product will not be marketable. Also the City will have to pay a higher processing
fee in order to retrieve the recyclable materials,

-for this particular site, 2446 Wilson, the issue of access is apparent. The complex has

constructed a shelter-type container located at the end of Atkins Ave. where the residents can put
their bags for pick-up. There is a large dumpster for refuse collection that is directly in front of
the pick-up location. Accessing the pick-up location requires the trucks to pull-in and back out
all the way to Shaughnessy St. in order to turn around. The alternative is to use a private
driveway on Atkins to do this.

Francis, John Du»gee, our Sanitation Foreman, and myself agree that only see-through bags
should be used for curbside recycling.
NOTE: Councillor Keryluk has been notified by some of the residents and he will be monitoring
the pick-up situation at this complex. Please send a copy of your response to him.

(

~e T. Pynenburg

Project Technician
attachment

Ilail!iljrI,!

. -:'-.=':='ll"
i:-'=;
-„-';=i'i,'

!g!

IIjlI!5/Ij
til5 E

ssitii nii I(II
gli'tnallssmI~l~raatattnntg
I/It
— atr!I
I--ti yi ~ Sin"
~III!1~1!
=
..".="
-ie==:
.—
II'/)I EI!

—; ]Itrasnaa~ — ~ami~
~~~+!lggggRII
-- il ~'~
—
—-.—
saaiIIII/Ntll!!!n
n+g~~
- 'l~ agt+
I---'-=ui=.===.-.—
.—,,
sns
-=--:!p'-:=i-,.~hestia
..
...
=
—
g~"
~ilttgiw=-I
'"
.
=
'Psttr='-"'"'~'-~,
t:c-st
a~iitai! igglfgjgii iiiiiti! -'!
I
"
"'''!i% I IIIIIISI~Itn'" »'aii,"„

'--

I'lgl

ii

isa ~ Ltil IllÃ

'

&r

uns ~%I

i

=

~

'

.

=

ir

—

II

'I

I ii

g

w

~

.

'sm salaatIII! g,,
$

.'l
g

I.". ~

!!

Iat t tsg pggjjgIti 0 II

4

Our File: 1500,20

yaur FilaI

(TM)

Regional Waste Manager
Ministry of Environment
103 A Avenue
15326
Surrey, British Columbia

Tol

AS-12863

—

V3R 7A2

Application for Approval
Pursuant to waste Managermnt Act.
on bshe).f of fmperial oil Itd., Products Division
net ad Ma. nh d. ) con
have reviewed the subject application, and.
We have no comments.
(
)
We have concerns as follows I
X )
See attached letter.

we

(

(X

)

The following would satisfy our concerns l
See attached letter.

(Signature)

(Date)
(604) 944-5411
(Telephone wo.)

Francis ". (C. Cheunr p. vno
(I(ame
please print)
—

CITY OF PORT COOUTTLAM

(Agency)

cc:

-;:==;Sll
Ik sii~P['

Councillor M. Cates, Chair, Environmental Protection Committee
Councillor R. Talbot, Co-Chairman, Environmental Protection Committee
J. Maitland, City Treasurer, Deputy City Administrator
J.E. Yip, P. Eng., Deputy City Engineer

'::: ¹ Rls'mam)+HI
~L!
~ N~
'

g)'~y)l

',

Q[)g) IK

l

'Ill@ QPfP

II@I

tmaw

.'~p

)(iii:"

'll am m a
I

I

lfsmas

~gggg

ega,,

NIXIE)(

~ miI[Ig~llmRNIHlflgmII)Egad+

I~I%IÃ)IIIIII M» — „)II
IIISSKIIIIIIII) mml,

ml mI ~

„"

~
mm

5

811'sgsal

(

'
asamm a

==.

I

'afmmaaiiii
'.'—

—

~

=

-

»~II 'M1/

mmaa
~

i~ ei sime~ll

warms(~g

—

I

a ~ I IIIfi(I(IF)I)g
( (% 1I ('Ig!)I (1

m)) FT

'i

'" "
i':.' "Ikl Illl~
.;~la~mgl(mg "= = 'REKBIMI1
— — '=

—:

FILE: 1500.20

April 13, 1994

Regional Waste lvlansger
Ministry of Environment
15326-103 A Avenue
Surrey, B.C.,
V3R.7A2

Dear Sirsnd/or Madam,
SUBJECT:

APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL
PURSUANT TO WASTE MANAGEMENT ACT ON BEHALF OF IMPERIAL
OIL LTD., PROJECTS DIVISION
DATED MARCH 4, 1994 (Your File: AS-12863)

We are in receipt of your letter of March 31, 1994 regarding the above capticned application. We have
reviewed the subject application and we have concerns as follows:
l.
2.

Public safety and heaith issue of local residents.
Odour problem resulted from bio-remediation, namely manure.
Noise and air emission problem caused by treatment facility.
Leachate prcbletn from hydrocarbon contaminants,

The following would satisfy our concerns:
1.

2.

3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

~~~1ruls,
~aatttSls[

g~lml

Iw
WIRgg

Fencing around the perimeter of the site must be maintained at ag times.
An open letter notifying local residents of the scope of work, potential safety and health concerns
caused resulted from bio-remediation, emergency cn ttact person and phone number in the event
of an emergency and hour of operations.
Erect proper signage on site notifying local residents of the scope of work, emergency contact
person and phone number in the event of an emergency.
Odour from bin-remedistion be filtered and ventilated.
Treatment facility operations hours must be restricted to normal business working hour and must
be conform tc City of Port Coquitlam Noise Bylaw.
Air emission quality from treatment facility must meet G.V.R.D. Air Emission Guideline.
Approved leachate collection system must be constructed for the treatment facility.

.~~'v~ ~ +~~

AA~
6 r "Q,
Should yns have any further inquiries, please do not hesitate to contact me at 944-5411.
Yours very uuly

((II'isst
Rg
IgIIIIII Sg
(+1% 8 I I

Francis K.K, Cheung, p. Eng.
Project Engineer

I

APR j 3

6

: ~I

~~%811&i~d~ Im~m@IAR ~awimaaws~~mtmggggl~-'— =-BRIC

Siss sm

g@

~ia~a—

APR

5

'94 14:26

g

FROM GVRD 9 WASTE RECYCLE

PAGE . 881/862

TO PT COO

Gn.'aier ftancoutter Regional Distr!ct

4330 Nn(tmaau 6amaae Bduah Columbia. Canada V6(f 408

am~(
Telephone (rxta) 4324(200
Faa (((04j 432&23(

Solid Wtaatu Oepatfment- T(t((604j 436~00 Fax(604j 4364181 t/4368880

TOI

WASTE REDUCTION COORDINATORB

PROM:

PAM NEL
GVRD

idyll

Solid Waste and Recycllng De pertinent

8a!
terat
61$ a aau u

|

~
II~II
a

I

III II
~

I

I II

INfIII

j'll II
,

'

Wl

IIliIII II
IjlbtMj

438~01

Fax:

438-6611

XY

fc

[

e

'IIial

Phone:

Please distribute appropriate person(s);
Anmors
Hal Weinberg
Belcarra
Jamle Ross
Burnaby
Ralph Bischcfl
Coquitlam
Debbie Moore
Delta
Sharon Horsburgh
Delta
Wayne Mac Eachem
Langley
Ed Trottler
Langley
Pete Scales
Lions Bay
John Jordon
Maple Ridge
Kelli Spelrs
Matsqui
Rick Bomhof
Matsqui
John Richards
New Westminster Catalln Dobrescu
l"lorth Vaffcoilver Allen Lynch
Pitt Meadows
Greg Cross
Port CoquiUam
Ann Pynenburg
Port Moody
Ken Hanna
Richmond
Suzanne Bycralt
Surrey
Gerry McKinnon

Yancower

White Rock
Electoral Areas

Julia Gordon
Hetman Howlett
Sarah Pearson

M
fl3I,"

I

Fax: 469-0537 «04
Fax; 939-5034 «06
Fax: 294-7425 «07
Fax: 664-1654 ¹09
Fax: 946-7492 ¹40
Fax: 946-3823 ¹41
Fax: 530-4371 «13
Fax: 633-8110 ¹15

lIMII,

II
LIINI

im~,

Fax.'214843 ¹16

Fax: 467-8100 ¹42
Fax: 863-2219 ¹20
Fax: 650-7286 ¹43

~

%NRIII
M

I IIllfl
frit
I

awm a
Sa nil 6

I',ILI II

e'Iln

Fax: 671-01 17 ¹45
Fax: 5364t049 ¹36
Fax: 436-6970 ¹47

lf

I

I

Ia

iif

ii

/a

I

'I

I

006 teer.fax
I fi&

I III
I

APR-85-1994

15(29

I

I

x I 1

Ijljplf

Fax'521-3895 ¹21
Fax: 984-3583 ¹44
Fax: 465-2405 ¹25
Fax: 944-5407 «27
Fax: 936-9830 «28
Fax: 276-4197 ¹30
Fax. 599-0866 ¹46

Fax No. 43(H(61 1 - One Touch 602
Fax No. 436 6660 - One Touch 602

el

I

P.aft~~

684 436 6811

APR 13 894
n

I

i4
'I

IS
RD

EJUer
uir(SES sr(I

en

idpa
ela N

6,t

nt eo

Stew
ch), t
Asso

ofu

artme
glv su
st!no
I T
g}IJr. re

an I
ii

I

lm4 I

1

milli

$

I!Iiwl'I'll

What would it take for your m
curbside collection program?
rr„.-f; I,
r
I

"I l

!

L»i! !&i
IIIll I I

What problems do you foresee resulting from such a program?
VJ( !Ip
7
o47sr(p
rrrPr1(rm~
I ~, II

(8 PI

II I

II'
Ii

44

II il

I

IS (11

4

~ 3

.I', '6.'~I

IIC

~-.Lr,.'~
ILS
ar" !, c!
gi I, J. s ( r.,-( .
- r

44

I

IA

L( I P.

O I IJ

—

~

c~r 7(

por:-.i.r-) A cp(DPSS( rs-;~.

.-'.; .:

Nil ili
ep 4I'I
I

\

.

SMI
1%

.

I

Iii

~„r...'4 -I:.-.I r~.,f .... rr

~4 1 g~-c o.~
r

pfc —

-4

.

PLEASE RETURN YOUR RESPONSE BY FAX ( 666 66'I'I) NQI LATER THAN
APRIL 16TH. Thanks,

P

4 74 FAX. OOC

TQTRL

APR-05"1994

15(38

684 436 6811

i Sll

~ 16

PAGE.882

P.88M 4
APR

i

3

gg

I