‘Yrecords, Ce ee es rom Minnesota two years ago decamped a roughneck rebel poet and dreamer named Bob Dylan, then 20, packing his guitar and songs, bound-for-glory to New York where he settled un- quietly on the Lower East Side and set about to dismember the Establishment, limb by limb. “Slush in my boots all winter long wandering around the Vil- lage. Cold winter — snow that high,” he gestured during an in- iterview, arms describing the big- 8est snowbank since the blizzard of ’88. “Worked all day in a Greenwich Village coffee house blowing harmonica behind some Suy for one or two dollars a day —had to éat.” * * * Bob Dylan has come a _ long Way in two years. Known today as the “most prolific young song- writer in America,” his topical Protest songs are heard at inte- Sration and peace rallies, on radio; and in concert across the nation. His particular Concerns are war, discrimination, Capital punishment and exploita- tion, and his poems and songs reflect implacable anger at war- Mongers, racists, brutal police and the wealthy—all of whom, he Says in a recent song, ‘‘ain’t a- Sonna run my world.” Motivated by a strong desire to run his own world, Dylan util- es the most trenchant weapons at his command—a poetic imagin- ation and contempt for injustice —to dereunce those who want to run ities him, whether they hide behind a Ki#&K hood or a stock market ticker. * * * Clad in worn boots, rough black trousers and a rumpled work shirt, Dylan’s slight frame presents itself as a challenge to all that is comfortable and com- placent in American life. His singing is uncontrived and forceful. His language is a comb- ination of working class .Minne- sota, uncompromised by rules of grammar, and the hip jargon of Harlem and the Village. “J don’t think when I write,” he said. “I just react and put it down on paper. I’m serious about everything I write. For instance, ~ I get mad when I see friends of mine sitting in Southern jails, getting their heads beat in. What comes out in my music is a call A whole new gen- ation of folk singers are coming on to the scene in North Am- erica. Some of them are opportunists — quick to cash in on the popularity of folk songs, while they can. Others, like Bob Dylan, re- gard a folk song in its true perspective —a chance to say something wort h- while. for action.”’ Dylan has often been compared with Woody Guthrie, whom he reveres, and with Bertolt Brecht, his favorite poet. There are ele- ments of both in his songs and even in his general conversation. Describing the misery brought on the workers of his native state by Eastern mining interests — personalizing the latter with the pronoun “‘he,’’ Dylan “‘talked’’ a song of exploitation and rebellion: “You should’a seen what he did to the town I was raised in — seen how he left it. He sucked up my town. It’s too late now for the people — they’re lost. When will it be too late for him? “The same guy who sucked up my town wants to bomb Cuba, but he don’t want to do it himself— send the kids. He made all this money, but what does he do to earn it? Take away his money and he’d die. Punch him in the gut enough times and he’d die. He’s a criminal, a crook, a’ murd- erer.”’ Daylan’s songs are attempts to punch “‘him’’ in the gut. Be- yond this he does not profess any social or political philosophy other than the desire for a world in which ‘everybody can just walk around without anybody bother- ° ” ing them.” His rebellion is per-: sonal, directed against repressive anti-life forces in general, rather than to specifics such as econom- ics and politics. ; Capitalism?—‘‘Well I object to somebody riding around in a Cadillac when somebody else is lying in the gutter.”’ Socialism?—‘“‘I’d like to visit Russia someday; see what it’s like, maybe meet a Russian girl.” United States?—‘‘Ain’t nobody can say anything honest in the United States. Every place you look is cluttered with phoneys and lies.” Bob Dylan-a rising young rebel : Kennedy?—‘‘He’s all right, but he’s a phoney, pretending all the time.” Politics?—‘‘No, I’m not gonna vote because there’s nobody to — vote for; nobody that looks like me, the way I feel . . . I'd like to see a government made up of people like Bertrand Russell, Jim Forman (of SNCC), Marlon Brando and people like that.’’ Dylan returned recently from the South where he sang during a Negro voter registration drive. He plans to go back soon. MUSIC In Mississippi, he says, ‘‘there’s a feeling in the air. More people ~ are willing to say. “To hell with my security, I want my rights.’ 1 want to help them if I can. ‘They really dig my music down ‘there, too.” = One of Dylan’s most popular songs, ‘Blowin’ in the Wind,’’ re- flects the ‘“‘feeling’’ in Mississippi and, indeed, throughout the na- tion: ‘‘How many roads must a’ man walk down before he’s call- a man/How many seas must a: white dove sail before she sleeps: in the sand/How many times’ must the cannon ball fly before they’re forever banned?/The an- swer, my friend is blowin’ in the wind = 2: Jack A. Smith (National Guardian) Portrait of Sweden The Social - Democrats have been in ‘power in Sweden for 30 _ years now, and the international _ Social-Democrat leaders always hold up Sweden as a land of “ec . . ’ _ democratic socialism.’ But has there been any signifi- Cant change in the economic and Social structure? Have monopoly and capitalistic ownership disap- Peared? Has the financial oligar- chy been eliminated? * * * A terse but very definite ans- Wer to all these questions has €en given by Tore Browaldh, one Of Sweden’s leading bankers. He told a business meeting in New York that Sweden was the ‘least Socialized’? country in Western Europe. And in pfoof of that he Cited the fact that 92 percent of industry is privately owned. In Short, we have the testimony of One of Sweden’s biggest bankers that after 30 years of Social- €mocratic government the Country remains as safe as ever for the capitalists. Dr. Hermansson describes the °Mnipotence of monopoly in a land of “democratic socialism” and the part played by the 15 big financial families, who be- Ween them coritrol most of the Countries industries, banks and WORTH _ READING Economic Growth and Un- derdeveloped Countries, by Maurice Dobb. Price 75c. This booklet is an attempt to discuss some of the essen- MEIS oF sconomit develop- Ment in the colonial and Semi-colonial countries. . At Present they are handi- Capped by widespread pover- ty and economic backward- Ness and are tied to the Wheels of imperialism, from Which they are striving for Political independence. Un- J8ss this can be overcome, v&Y are destined to remain led: to neo-colonialism. insurance companies. They are the real rulers of Sweden. And five of them are, in the author’s words, the ‘“‘five fingers of the iron hand of fi been eliminated? garchy.” 8o8oeetetetetetetels ance capital,” exercizing their control of the nation’s economy. At present, 2.8 percent of the population, some 200,000 persons, are shareholders in various firms. But two-thirds of all this capital stock is concentrated in the hands ‘of 17,700 persons, or 0.2 percent of the population. And within this group there are 835 millionaires, who together acount for nearly - one-fourth of all the capital stock. A curious kind of socialism this, considering that the bulk of the national wealth has been monop- olized by some 17,000 persons out of a population of 7,500,000. What is more, this monopoly elite came into being largely during the “Paper Work Who ‘owns the means of production in Sweden? Have monopoly and capitalist owner- ship disappeared? Has the financial oligarchy im Some revealing answers to these pertin- = ent questions were supplied recently by A. An- = tonov, writing in the Journal “New Times.” Antonov based his comments upon a book by Swedish Commuist leader C. H. Hermansson, entitled: “Monopoly and Financial Oli- The PT is pleased to print a condensed version of Antonov’s remarks. -after 30 years of ‘socialism’ thirty years of Social-Democratic government, which has done practically nothing in the way of nationalization. a useful purpose—they make it easy for a big holder to exercise virtually total control of an enter- prise with as little as 10 percent of the capital stock. Hermansson shows that over three - quarters of aluminum; electrolytic copper, aircraft eng- ines, planes, tractors, typewriters, refrigerators, telephones electric generators, electric motors, cement, bottles, sugar and a long list of other goods are produced by one firm. The usual capitalist process of financial concentration in ever- fewer hands is continuing. Fifty leading firms account for about half of employment and produc- Lan Chien-an Cartoon. by uon. By cartel agreements, inter- locking directorships, organic ties with leading banks, etc., they are able to amass super profits which any capitalist in the world would envy. In fact, the picture painted by Hermansson of the coalescence of industrial and financial capital differs very little from that of the Parks’ portrait of Canada: “Anatomy of Big Business.” The banks, sitting at the top of this monopoly edifice (and con- trolled by the 15 leading families) are a typical example of concen- tration of finance. In 1909 the country had 84 banks; by 1959, a bare 50 years later, these had been swallowed and dwindled to 16. In 1959 the four biggest banks accounted for three-quarters of all banking assets and for an equal share of all banking busi- ness. Even Wall Street can prob- ably not match that level of fin- * ancial concentration. : The banks have used their po- sition to make deep inroads into the economy. In 1933, the Big Four mentioned above were rep- resented on the boards of 394 companies; in 1941 the figure was 417, and in 1955 it was 548. Of the 50 leading companies, only nine are owned by the state or co-operatives. Three of the biggest banks have their men on the boards of 38 of- these leading companies. The rest, including several state-owned firms, are indirectly connected with one or another of the leading banks, often through subsidiaries. * * * Carried further, this coalescence of industrial and financial capi- tal led to the rise of a financial oligarchy—the Wallenberg, Weh- tje, Johnson, Bonnier, Brostom, Soderberg, Kempe, Klingspor, Jeansson, ‘Dunker, Hahmmarskjold Jacobsson, Ase- lius and Throne-Holst families. They are closely. associated with big banks, insurance companies, industrial and commercial firms. Writing about just one of these families, ‘Time’ magazine (Jane 7) remarked: ‘In no other in- Schwartz,’ dustrialized nation in the world does one family exert such en- ormous economic power.” The allusion was to the Wallenberg dynasty. which, ‘Time’ says, controls half of all Swedish in- dustry. It is hard to say how accurate: that estimate is, but that the: Wallenbergs are Sweden’s big- gest Big Business family is be- yond question. oy a * There is a Wallenberg on the board of directors of at least 97 firms, banks and insurance companies, employing a total of 200,000 workers in Sweden and several thousand in other count- ries. Marcus Wallenberg, the banker member of the family, is a di- rector of 63 concerns, and in 45 of them he is either president, vice-president, or managing di- rector. Another Wallenberg — Jacob—sits on the board of 31 firms, in 27 of which he is either president or vice-president. The Wallenberg bank, now the country’s third-largest, held 258 directorships in industry and had financial ties with 176 firms. In: 1955, the respective figures were 175 and 139. This one example shows the growth of monopoly capital under favorable condi- tions. * * - The wealth of factual material gathered and ably organized by Dr. Hermansson is conclusive proof that in the 30 years of Social - Democratic government concentration of capital and mon- opoly power has continued to grow. : Seen at closer range, the much- vaunted ‘‘democratic soci7tism" is just another name for capital- ism in a country ruled by 15 Big Business families. Dr. Hermansson has made: a valuable contribution to the Marx- ist-Leninist understanding — of modern capitalism. September 13, 1963—PACIFIC TRIBUNE—Page 5 _