UL aU IL oe eS | ee 1. Lt lal sdedual ys | [oUn een TT RRAP funds used to evict tenants It may be a cold and bitter New Year’s eve for six Kitsilano tenants if their fast buck landlord succeeds in his plot to use public funds and Socred legislation to drive them from their run down apartments and “renovate’’ them into luxury rent suites. But due to the resistance of the tenants, with the assistance of the Kitsilano Tenants’ Association, the landlord’s scheme has _ instead drawn attention to the misuse of the federal government’s Residential Rehabilitation Assistance Program (RRAP). and the injustice of the new provincial Residential Tenancies Act. Landlord Yen Yoy Enterprises has issued eviction notices for the tenants at 2020 Vine Street in Vancouver that.would have the low income tenants vacate on December 31. The eviction notice is illegal, but the rent increases ranging from 116 percent to 167 percent, effective January 1, 1978, are allowable under the terms of the Socred Residential Tenancies Act. The eviction notice is ostensibly because of a fire marshal’s order for Yen Hoy to bring his building up to fire safety standards, although the $25,000 in needed repairs do not require eviction. Yen Hoy has been under orders to make repairs for about two years, but it was only recently that he decided to do something about it — when he discovered that he could cash in on the federal RRAP program, and then charge the costs of renovations to the tenants. The RRAP program is_ sup- Eileen Coristine stands at the entrance to the run-down tenement building at the corner of Fourth Avenue and Vine in Vancouver. The landlord wants her to pay $295 for her room — more than double her previous rent of $135. posedly designed to assist homeowners to make repairs and upgrade their homes. A homeowner can receive a loan of up to $10,000 at about 11 percent interest for basic repairs. But an additional feature of the program allows a landlord to get $10,000 per unit, on special easy terms. Education tax burden shifted to homeowner Local taxpayers will pay more for education in B.C. next year, with last week’s announcement by education minister Pat McGeer that another ‘“‘five mills’ of school tax will be added to property taxes. McGeer said last Thursday that the 1978 basic mill rate will rise from 37.5 mills to 42.5 mills. B.C. Teachers’ Federation president Pat Brady protested the increase last Friday, charging that the provincial government wants more and more control over education, but is paying less and less of its share of education costs. Brady pointed out that 1976 McMath Commission report on assessment and taxation recom-. Rankin column on page 7 mended that the provincial government pick up 75 percent of public school costs within five years. “Instead the ministry proposes to reduce the share paid out of general revenue to about 37 per- cent from the present 42.5 per- cent,’ said Brady, ‘Since the present government took over we’ve seen a 60 percent increase in the basic school mill rate levied on the local property owners. This government is moving quickly in reverse. The 1975 basic levy was 26.5 mills.”’ Education benefits all of society and it is not fair to expect property owners to bear in ever-increasing share of the cost, the teachers’ president said. Yen Hoy applied for and received $100,000 in RRAP funds. ‘ The Central Mortgage and Housing Corporation gave him the money at eight percent interest, with $37,500 of it as an outright grant. The landlord added $60,000 of his own money, made plans for $160,000 worth of renovations and then issued rent increases to the tenants. The tenants thought they were protected by the seven percent allowable rent increase, effective May 1, 1977. But according to section 67 of the new Socred lan- dlord and tenant act, the costs of renovations can be charged to tenants at a rate of 12 percent per year. The charge becomes an integral part of the rent and sub- ject to all future increases. Yen Hoy had no intention of passing on CMHC’s generosity to his tenants. He immediately made use of the provincial law to pass on the cost of renovations to the tenants instead, with disastrous results. Eileen Coristine is typical of the tenants in the old building. She is a student with a part time job who stays at 2020 Vine because of the low rent — $135 for a bachelor apartment. Her rent has been raised to $295 per month, although her eviction notice for December 31 is still pending. The other tenants will be hit equally as hard. Only one works full time, as a teller in a bank. Two others are students and two are unemployed. None of them can afford the $300 plus rents, and that is why Yen Hoy wants them out. “Three of us moved in August 1st, but there was no mention of any of this,” Coristine told the Tribune this week, ‘“‘But he (Yen Hoy) must have had his plans well advanced by then. “T don’t think any of us have a place to go. We’ll never find a place we can afford in this neigh- borhood.”’ The tenants received their rent increases in late September, and soon after got in touch with the Kitsilano Tenants’ Association. The Tenants’ Association advised them to hold off, and fight the issue when the eviction notices — which they were sure would follow — came. True toform, Yen Hoy issued the Notices of Termination, but his greed pushed him past the legal limits. The law permits evictions for major renovations but requires the landlord to give 120 days notice and pay up to $300 compensation to the tenants. If the landlord had followed the procedure, the tenants would have had little recourse. But instead Yen Hoy gave only 30 days notice, using the fire marshal’s notice as justification. Last week the Kitsilano Tenants’ Association took. the case to Vancouver city council’s com- mittee on community services, chaired by alderman Harry Rankin. Rankin and some other aldermen were outraged at the misuse of the RRAP program to force tenants on to the street and eliminate moderately priced housing. The committee agreed to send an alderman, the fire marshal and the city’s RRAP administrator to the Rentalsman’s hearing on the evictions. They also agreed to arrange a meeting betwee the city, RRAP administrators and CMHC to discuss the misuse of the program by landlords. “RRAP was designed to upgrade substandard housing for low- income people, not to enable landlords to turn worn out premises into luxury revenue properties,’’ KTA spokesman Paul Lawrence said to Rankin and the community services committee, “Note that the loan is funded by the taxpaper and paid back by the tenants who are taxpayers, while the landlord benefits from low interest, ‘forgiveness’ and an increase in the value of his property. So far as we are con- cerned, that qualifies as a rip off.” Rankin’s committee agreed with Lawrence and will assist the KTA in having the Notices of Ter- mination quashed before the Rentalsman. They are illegal, in ~ any event. Neither will the rent increases take effect immediately. The Rent Review Commission will be forced to nullify the increases because Yen Hoy hasn’t yet spent any money on renovations, not even the $25,000 to bring the building up to fire safety standards. The tenants are likely, then, to win a respite, and at least spend Christmas and New Years with a roof over their heads. And because the landlord can’t maké major renovations with them in the building, and he can’t get them out unless he follows legal procedures, they are likely- to get 120 days notice and some compensation for moving costs. The real victory, however, is still to be fought for. That battle will begin when Harry Rankin and CMHC sit down to discuss the misuse of RRAP funds. But it’s not going to be won until a new lan- dlord and tenant act gives real protection to tenants, regardless of the handouts given to landlords. System omits Native needs B.C.’s education system is not meeting the needs of native and low income students in the north- west of the province, the British Columbia Teachers’ Federation: charged last week. Doug McLeod, president of the Hazelton Local of the BCTF, called on the provincial government to provide additional teachers for the Hazelton area to reduce class sizes and provide individual students with more attention. He also called for the development of a curriculum which reflects the life style and culture of the students. Students in the northwest are different from others in the province, said McLeod, because of the poverty in the area and the predominance of Native students who often speak English only as 2 second language and have’ dif- ferent cultural backgrounds. The teachers’ organization at Hazelton has outlined a number of. proposals to improve education standards in the region. In one way or another, however, each involves ‘the expenditure of more govern- ment monies for education. he ink was scarcely dry on our comment last week about the actions of B.C. Telephone’s sister company in the Dominican Republic when we received through the-mail an intriguing bit of correspondence relating to B.C. Tel’s ac- tions on its home ground. The source enclosed a photostat letter from the mayor of Chilliwack, William G. Simpson, to Gordon MacFarlane, chairman and chief executive officer of B.C. Telephone Company. In the letter, dated Sept. 29, 1977, mayor Simpson thanked MacFarlane for keeping him informed “re your labor negotiations’, and added, ‘“‘At last we are beginning to present a solid front. “T do hope that you stand on the courage of your con- victions and insist that you are the boss and will purchase material and services from sources that give you the best deal,”’ he continued. ; “The contracting-out clause is a demand made upon municipalities too and we can only continue to resist as long as large corporations such as yours do likewise. The general public, I think, are prepared to suffer a little now rather than face a disaster a few years hence.” Although we can only speculate as to the opinions that MacFarlane offered in his letter, the corespondence make one thing clear: B.C. Tel’s adamant stance in demanding changes to the contracting-out clause had nothing to do with getting goods and services “at competitive prices” as company propaganda would have it, but was aimed at PACIFIC TRIBUNE—DECEMBER 9, 1977—Page 2 PEOPLE AND ISSUES undermining what security the Telecommunications Workers Union has been able to maintain. From the beginning, B.C. Tel has wanted to farm jobs out at the expense of union employees. It still wants that. And even before it provoked the current strike, it was seeking the backing of right wing municipal governments in a concerted attack on job security. * * * rom Karl Zuker comes a press release announcing the formation of a new society — and a request for the assistance of readers who may be able to assist in the society’s inaugural project. The new organization is the Municipal History Society and under the guidance of president Harold Pritchett and secretary Zuker, it intends to prepare a history of municipal politics in the Lower Mainland. The Society, made up of retired pensioners who have been active in community organizations over the years, is funded by a New Horizons grant under Health and Welfare Canada and has engaged the services of labor journalist and historian Ben Swankey as consultant and researcher. Central to the history will be a study of the influence of community organizations on municipal policy and the role played by labor in municipal politics. How can readers help? ‘‘We would like to see the minutes and records of ratepayer and other groups, many of which © are no longer in existence,” Zuker explains. ‘‘We’re in- terested in letters, briefs, photos, newspaper clippings — anything that will provide information about issues, people and activities. We want to go back as far as we can, right to the origin of all the municipalities in the Lower Mainland.” - He adds his assurances that all materials turned over to the Society will be carefully preserved and returned to the owners. Credit will also be given in the history to those who supplied information and documents. Anyone who can assist with material should send it to Karl Zuker, secretary, Municipal History Society, 2809 Wall Street, Vancouver, B.C. V5K 1B1. For further information contact Karl Zuker at 254-7678 or Ben Swankey at 433-8323, in Vancouver. Editor — SEAN GRIFFIN Business and Circulation Manager — PAT O'CONNOR Published weekly at Suite 101 — 1416 Commercial Drive, Vancouver, B.C. V5L_ 3X9 Phone 251-1186 Subscription Rate: Canada, $8.00 one year; $4.50 for six months; All other countries, $10.00 one year Second class mail registration number 1560