The Times ‘squeeze’ WITHIN hailing distance of its first anniversary the Vancouver Times is appealing to its readers and . supporters for $100,000 or more to meet immediate “sur- vival” requirements. Just prior to the birth of the Times in mid-1964 this paper commented editorially: “If the Times editorial poli- cies conform to the special interests of Big Business, adver- tizing, that life-blood for continued publication, is as- sured.” Obviously during its brief advent the Times has not fully conformed with the dictates of Big Business, hence no big advertizing revenue, and its current urgent appeal to the public for financial aid. It may be recalled that thousands of B.C. people in all walks of life, convinced of the need of a news media competitor to the highly centralized and controlled mon- opoly press — the Vancouver Sun and the Vancouver Pro- vince, invested their dollars and their moral support in the Times. They had had more than enough of this “Charlie McCarthy” twin echo of Big Business. They wanted an out-spoken champion, a new media for the “little man.” They believed the Times was the answer. That the Times is being systematically deprived of this advertizing life-blood is now glaringly evident in its “survival” appeal. It is also convincing proof that while the Times may not be all its readers and supporters may have wished it to be, it is much more than some of our big monopoly interests, including its “Charley McCarthy” ‘compettitors intend permitting it to be. Hence their joint efforts at its financial strangulation. The problem now facingtheTimes projects a long- overdue need, raised in the House of Commons by NDP- MP Douglas Fisher, a Combines Investigation into the monopoly character and ramifications of the Vancouver newspaper situation. A situation which clearly points up the existence of a monopoly combination sufficiently powerful to strangle a competitor in less than one year’s’ operation — when the latter fails, or refuses to conform to. the policy dictates of a monopoly hierarchy. “If the Times is to survive,’’ warbles a local oracle, atetatatetete® nooo nececenelerece. Tom ~McEWEN hen the immortal American author, Mark Twain wrote his satirical “War Prayer” around the period of 1899, when the U.S, was waging a murderous war upon the peoples of the Phill- ipines, little did he think that this same “prayer” would be highly appropriate sixty-six years later in the case of Vietnam, : It might be mentioned, en passant, that U.S. imperialism holds no monopoly when it comes to annexing “God” in their wars of aggression and conquest. Most of our “free West” politicians, “statesmen” and warmongering tubthumpers invariably take it for granted that God is “on their side” in the bloody business of subjugating others, Mark Twain’s “War Prayer” isa classical illustration of this monstrous hypocrisy, “O Lord, our Father, our young patriots, idols of our hearts go forth to battle ——_be Thou near them, With them in spirit, we also go forth from the sweet peace of our beloved firesides to smite the foe, d gaat: “O Lord, our God, help us to tear their soldiers to bloody shreds with our shells. Help us to cover their smiling fields with the pale forms of their patriot dead, Help us to drown the thunder of the guns with the shreiks of their wounded writhing in pain, “Help us to lay waste their humble homes with a hurricane of fire, Help us wring the hearts of their unoffending widows with unavailing grief. Help us to turn them out roofless with their little children to wander unfriended, the wastes of a desolated land, in rags and hunger and thirst — sports of the sunflames in summer, and the icy winds of winter; broken in spirit, worn in travail, imploring Thee, Lord, for the refuge of the grave, and denied it, “For our sakes who adore Thee Lord, blast their hopes, blight their lives, protract their bitter pilgrimage, their steps make heavy, water their way withtheir tears, stain the white snow with the blood of their wounded feet, The American Way of Life —Eccles, Br. Daily Worker $e See “it must prove to the public that there is good reason for it to survive.” That sounds profound, but it is mostly sound. The public has already “proved” the right of the Times to “survive” with their dollars. It now remains the job of a thorough Combines Investigation to establish the identity of the monopoly strangler. Celebrating our own 30th annniversary this year, the “PT” would regard it as a signal victory for a free press in 1965 were the Times to survive on its merits, rather than fall another victim’ to monopoly strangulation. O VER 2,500 American clergymen, Protestant. Catholic and Jewish are the signatories to an “Open Letter’’ in one of last week’s editions of the New York Times. The letter urges an “immediate ceasefire” in Vietnam and a conference of all “involved nations, including China’ to work for peaceful negotiations. The letter begins: “‘Mr. President—In the Name of God, stop it!” “We ask it, in the spirit of love of Him who is the source of love, and who is the ever- faithful refuge and friend of all that are sore beset and seek His aid with humble and contrite hearts, Amen,” : towns, literally tons of bombs of all kinds; napalm to burn the flesh off the bodies of little children; fire bombs, the new “incendigel” kind, which destroys all vegetation, crops, the very land itself, The “sport” of low- flying machine-gunning, designed to wipe out entire village popu- lations, “anything that moves,” as a U.S. G.I, “adviser” proudly boasts, To get the best sound effects, Mark Twain’s. “War Prayer” should be intoned in a soft Texas. you-a-1-1 draw-a-1, justafter the one thousand and umpteenth “ex. ' planation” from Washington, London or Ottawa, on how the U.S. is “saving” South Vietnam from Communist aggression,” After that, as Mark Twain would undoubtedly agree, some genuine prayers — coupled with mass action would be in order —— to absolve both Man-and “God” from the war crimes of U.S, “Christian” gangsters. And just recently the U.S, ad- .mission (with voluminous “ex- planations) of the use of poison gas, outlawed by all civilized nations —— except the U.S.A, Since a U.S, government official recently claimed the “right” of his government “to lie” all such * President Johnson has termed | Worth | Quoting | “The U.S. Chambers of Commett has undertaken an ‘objective & academic’’ study of poverty in Amel | ca. The study will be conducted bY 100 leading business executives. _ It is reported the executiv® were cautioned fo wear gloves W i shaking hands witth a ‘‘subject,” ™ scrub thoroughly immediately aft Advice to the poverty-stricken sub | ject: Wear pants without pockets ™ | count your fingers immediately #™ the handshake. ‘ —MINE-MILL COMMENTATOR, Local 480, March, 1965 * An official from the U.S. Consul 4 “too busy” to meet a deputation” | Sydney warfies, longshoremem ~ | 11:30 a.m. last Wednesday when sought fo tell him what they thous” | of his Government's actions in vier nam. dt “He may be able to meet yO", 5 p.m.” they were told. ‘Well, him” sand the warfies, .‘that we © also busy.. and may be too busy” load U.S. ships.” The official found he was no !0 “too busy.” —AUSTRALIAN TRIBUNE, February 24, '65. * Credit where credit is due: iy Americans have taught some Englitt to everybody in the world whatew their language. Three words any? | “Yank, Go Home.” ie | —PEOPLE’S VOICE, New. | Zealand, March 10, ‘65: * Any political party coming to P® immediately falls heir to all the 9 ters, drifters and gimme guys t a4 swarmed around the trough during ™ last party in power, as well as collec ee ing new ones of their own. . © If the party stays in too long Mi ; political scene takes on a jack round carrion” look till there's noth much left but the carrion. It’s health) fora party to get scuttled at !é oe every 10 years — a new bunch pie a chance of staying clean for awhile is the jackals congregate again. S¥¢ our democratic way of life . . - —LILLOOETT NEWS, April 1, '65. wet rife ct explanations are highly sus : and don’t square with the face Moreover, since U.S. pombine raids upon the sovereign SY | of North Vietnam also invol¥? wanton murder of civilian popu lations, President Johnson’ complaint about “a wanton act a ruthlessness” applies with MWY greater force against his 0” regime, than against the peOP™ | of Vietnam, S For. President Johns0? however, there is anes route —— which doesn’t apPlY ©, people defending their home! from the “ruthlessness” of U¥" aggression Get out. Vietnam! : Pi as the bombing of the U.S. Embassy in Saigon “a wanton act of ruth- lessness,” This display of ”indignation” should fool no one, when com- pared to the countless wanton acts of violence by the armed forces of U.S, of which President Johnson is “commander-in- chief,” against the peoples of Vietnam, Published Vancouver 4, B.C. Indiscriminate bombing of Vietnam villages, hamlets and of postage in cash. Associate Editor — MAURICE RUSH Circulation Manager — JERRY SHACK 2 Ford Bldg., Mezzanine No. 3, 193 E. Hastings St. Subscription Rates: ; Canada, $4.00 one year. North and South America and Commonwealth countries, $5.00 one year. All othe! countries, $6.00 one year. Authorized as second class m2! by the Post Office Department, Ottawa and for payment weekly at * Phone MUtual 5-5288 — April 9, 1965—PACIFIC TRIBUNE--Pag? ©