The Contractor ha
piling to this depth in
Contract unless the City i iti costs for the
sheet Piling. He maintains that this is a design problem and
therefore the responsibility of the City. He has quoted a
price to compiete the project which jis considered in option

(A).

The Possibitity of accepting the ‘uneven Profile of the.
sewer by changing the Pipe material, size, and type of joint,
is considered as option (8B). .

AS an’
other two contract to
These other
Problems and are prepared
the prices quoted, The
lowest alternatiyv is quoted by H.B. Contracting and this
is considered in Option (C). Although ‘this option requires the -
termination of our present Contract and a cal| on the Bonding
Company to make up the difference between the original contract
price and the new contract price, this wilt ifkely result tn a
court battle and wit] certainly involve the cost of legal fees.

Option (D) and {E) involve a fow Pressure pump system with
each Property having an independent smali. pump to PUMP sewage
through a smal | dlameter force main.. This main can be laid
close to the surface and js not dependent on accurate line or
grade and therefore is cheap and easy to install. The system
is the same that is used in Mayfair Industrial Park and is an
ideal system where sof] conditions are poor. Option (D)
‘involves the Ownership by the City of the individual “grinder
Pumps whereas option CE) Involves private ownership.

-. The recommendation the grinder pump. -
‘system with private.ow ip of) ps. This option.
reduces the Initial fon tially. However,
this. optton become hen we talk about
extending the sewe industrial Area,
extend a gravity sewer System to Coast Meridian Road involves
depths aven greater than those along Broadway, With a
conventional system we can anticipate very high costs in the
future. With the alternative option (E) the future
Installation wit] also be simplif fed and much cheaper.

e@ options after the
You will note that option (E)