March 5th, 1973"

rental chargé $40.90).

moe : Carried,
" Aldernan Nabbett voted ‘against the resolution.

Prior to passage of the foregoing resolution Alderman Nabbett expressed the

opinion» that ‘the Coquitian District Musical | Festival should be entitied to free use”

of the Nabbett Roon.

From the ‘Industrial & Community Development Committee regarding the existing IcD Comm. re

_GVRD. Flood .
Plain poli
cles

and proposed G.V. R. D. Flood Plain Policies, stating that the Connittee endorsers
the recommendations of the Public Works and ‘Planning & & Zoning Conmittees and the
Environmental Sub- ~Connit tee; enphesizing, however, the retention of the Industrial
Area as outlined in the official Regional Pian, and expressing the opinion that as
the soils make-up is generally in the > Group 3 and 4 category, it has limited agri-
cultural Potential and is not suited for Tecreational évelopment.—

. Moved by Alderman Traboulay:

Seconded by Alderman Mabbett:

That as recommended in a report. from the Industrial & Community Development
Committee with respect to ‘the existing and Proposed G.¥.R.D. Flood | Plain Policies,
the Industrial Area | as outlined in the official Regional] Plan be retained since as
the soils make-up is generally in the Group 3 and PA category it has Limited agri-
cultural potential and is not suited for recreational development. “Garrisa.

From Alderman L.M. Traboulay, Council! s S.P. Cc, A. representative, March 2nd,
1973, reporting on a meeting held with Mr, Rady Hosegood a and Mr. John Van Der report) ©.”
Hoeven of the S.P.C.A, at. which time Mr. Hosegood Teassured the Committee that
there was adequate manpower in the Coguitian-Port Coquitlan-Port Moody area,

A brief discussion ensued and Alderman Traboulay gave a short summary of
the statistical information attached to the report. mo

Oo 7 es » Alderman

From Alderman LM. Traboulay, Council’ s S. P. CAs representative, March and, : Traboulay
se impound=
1973 advising that an impounding fee of a flat 20m was discussed in view of the ing fées,.

dog licens
fact that a number of complaints had been received that “there is no differential ete. . =
in pound fees for a licensed or unlicensed dog, and Teconmend ing that the By-law
be altered to provide a $20.00 pound fee for unlicensed dogs and a $10. 00 pound
fee for licensed dogs, which would: be in conformity with nost of the other muni~
cipalities in the Lower Mainland. Airman Traboulay, in his report, stated that
another problem in the By-law is the Provision that Tequires a. dog t to be Heensed
at four months, pointing out that a dog License fee is $5. 00 for a spayed female
or $20.00 for an uns payed fenale, and that veterinarians will not spay a female

until they are nearly ‘six months of age.

Moved by Alderman Traboulay:

Seconded by Alderman Ranger: