A woman’s page Bditor, Pacific Tribune: I enjoy reading ‘This Is Your Department!” As an ordinary housewife I am going to write what I please. While travelling on the streetcar recently, I got into conversation with a young war bride who, like myself, was attracted to an advertisement of a postwar kitchen on Rich- ards St “Qh,” said the young bride with a sigh, ‘how I would love a kitchen like that.’ Somehow that ad looks out of place among those shabby houses: She said: ‘Do you know I had visions of coming back to a grand new world from overseas. What a Shock TI got! Still the same old houses, and “@s far as I am concerned, Tf cannot get a house; have to live in two rooms and my hus- band gets so discontented” She rambled on and said she was going to howl plenty until she got a decent home and a kit- chen like the one on the ad- wertisement board. I ventured to Say perhaps if all the women got tegether and demanded the gevernment build homes, we would get some action. After all decent homes go a long way. toward making de cent citizens, to which my young friend agreed. Then the car came: to a stop and we wish- ed each other goodbye. Now ZI would suggest that we have @ housewive’s or woman’s page in your paper where women could exchange ideas on the postwar world. I handed the war bride the Tribune, and she asked ‘is there a woman’s page in this paper?’ I think the paper would attract more women rea- ders if we had articles of in- terest, IT mean apart from cur- rent events, that the average housewife would read. A HOUSEWIFE. Vancouver, B.C A “must” book Editor, Pacific Tribune: I enjoy your paper very much, but miss Cynthia Carter’s col- umn. What happened to her? Z have just finished reading The Great Conspiracy Against Russia, and if I had my way, it would be on the required list of every Man, woman, univers- ity and high school student. All this war hysteria, red- ‘baiting, ete., would soon stop if we thought over very care fully some of the facts put down in thet book. To you par- ents who shudder at the thought _Of another more terrible war, I plead, read it, have your teen- age boys and girls read it and think carefully of these facts: Dees Russia want war? Can't we all live peacefully, have a better standard of living, social Wo! Security and happiness in our old age? Yes! If we can stop this war hysteria, red-baitins ana all that it means by uniting all our efforts, and demand from these responsible a stop before it is too late. : (Mrs) D. Graveness. Vancouver, B:GC. On Mr. Templeton Editor, The Pacific Tribune: The other night I came home tired and hungry, and after Supper TI thought I would give my digestive system a lift with some good music. “Well,” TI thought to myself, “ I wonder if I can dial a good program ithout once again meeting up with that ‘eager beaver’ Bob Morrison.” And wouldn’t’ you know, the first program if bumped into was a very un- enlightening talk, called Keep- ing Posted. On what, I couldn’t imagine. Well, anyway, the speaker was a gentleman called R. J. Templeton. Now again may I say that I don’t want to criticize, but I feel that certain statements made*should be answered with comments every bit as caustic as those expressed by the speaker. Once again, it is the same old story, one of malicious red-bait- ing, communist (worker) hating propaganda. Yes, Mr. Templeton, we know what would happen if this sys- tem of private enterprise were. to collapse. Do you tnihk that it has had ample time to prove itself the system of all systems, one that can take care of the weak, 2s well as the strong, the poor as well as the rich? Or don’t you think that it has proven over and over again that it breeds nothing but greed, poverty and war—a sort of “sur- vival of the fittest’? To infer that the Son of God taught the ideals of private en- terprise to his disciples is a sacrilege. When he caused the loaves of bread to multiply, to feed the starving multitudes, did He first stop to consider how much he would make on the deal? Heaven help you, sir, if you believe that the Great God above has bestowed his blessings on this tangled mess of big business and inter- national cartels you call free enterprise. : Would He smile with satisfac- tion at the idea of doling out @ mere two dollars a week for food, and six dollars a month for rent to the unemployed— Dope peddlers UWSSIA is no utopia and the Russians don’t pretend it is, nmor seek to represent it as such to their neighbors. But the 29 years of the existance of Soviet power, in which must be taken into account 5 years of imperial- ist intervention, and almost 5 years of destructive Hitlerite ag- @ression, have sbown to the world, if not to the quack doc- tors of the kept press, that its Social system is superior to any- thing yet devised by man. Other- wise why the need to concoct anti-Soviet fabrications to bolster the sagging morale of bourgeois decadence, or use the departure of a humble emigrant and his family to invent new falsehoods? Like a high priest of some yogi cult Monseignor Hutchison utters a final valedictory, “It is permiss- able to doubt that they will like EACIFIC TRIBUNE — PAGE 5 Russia after Vancouver, but they will not return.” If someone with infinite patience and time to waste could plow through the volumin- ous materials conceived in the Huchison cranium, they would find sufficient reason for not plac- ing too much credence on this literary quack’s political clairvoy- ancy. They would discover what is already known in the world of literature, viz, that the contribu- tions on Soviet social, economic and political life which stand the | stresses of time, are the product of unbiased observation and de- duction, while the other, such as are fabricated by ‘Dr.’ Hutchison in his ‘Mr. Shpihun is going back to Russia,’ are simply a prepared narcotic to a jaded jittery class, who see in the success of Social- ism their own demise. Doubtless, like traffic in dope, the anti-So- viet mixture brings a good price. s bad manners. should. be - George Drayton, is just while tons of food were being dumped and grain was piled to overflowing in our elevators for the want of a paying= mar- ket? That was before the war, Mr. Templeton, but of course you wouldn’t know anything about that. AS for your hand-clapping about freedom of speech et al, in the same breath, sir, you advocate the muzzling of any person with the guts enough to get up and speak of what is on. his mind. Do you also realize that you do not insult a man when you call him a communist? You are complimenting him, for, accord- ing to the best dictionaries, communism is defined as: a theory for the reconstruction of Society on a cooperative basis. I'm sorry if I spoiled your fun, Mr. Templeton, now you will have to think of some oth- er “nasty” words if you (and brother Morrison) wish to in- sult the labor class. You call us Pagans. Is it paganism to want a square deal from the country of your birth? is it paganism to protest against the awful poverty and hunger which we, not you, experienced before this last war? Qh, and just one thing more, sir—the idea of asking your listener if he thinks you are right, and in the same breath answering “of course you do” is definitely. Sort of putting in his mouth, don’t you think? How about letting him have his freedom of thought, a theme which was most outstanding in your talk. This. bogey. which capitalist mouthpieces are conjuring up with the word “communism” stepped. Wes,--Mr. Templeton, I am socialist-mind- ed, a communist if you wish to call it that, because I (and hundreds of thousands more like me) are bound that. we shall not again return to the pitiful conditions which existed prior to 19389. Above all, that our children and our ‘children’s the words children shall have peace of mind in the knowledge that they may) look forward to a Square deal in life (although- they may never get their pic- tures in the society page) and social security. HERBER A. G CORMIER. Vancouver, B.C. : A job well done: Dear Comrades: It seems to me that the article on “National Health” as affect- ing the returned veterans by about tops. I know, personally, had I any idea such a state of affairs existed a year or two ago, would have made a great difference to me. Good work George, to put down in black and white for the first time, I believe, the actual conditions at Shaughnessy Hos- pital. What a contrast to all one ELears up and down the land; the old rumor factory we know so well in the first world war. Seems to me if that article was touched up and printed as a leaflet it would go well with the agitation for a better National Health pro- gram. Get all the veterans of both wars to read the article. I would say it will tend to counteract much of this misplaced opposi- tion (we read and hear so much about) to all that exists here at present, whether it is in the inter- est of the working people or not, and try for a “sub’ to the Tribune after they have read it! —LES FILLMORE. Hot Springs, Nakusp: Shor t Jabs by OF Bill 5 Vancouver is to have a first-time visitor next Mike Buhay week in the person of Councillor Michael Buhay of Montreal, “Mike” as we call him. He is an old friend of mine. I met him first in 1922 at the founding of the Workers’ Party. He Was a fluent speaker then and from what [ Can gather since I saw him last in 1929, has, like many other good things, improved with age. it is not Mike’s eloquence, however, that interests us. We have lots of eloquent visitors, to our sorrow. What males us com- ment on Mike Buhay’s visit te Vancouver is that, unlike some of those other eloquent visitors, he has spent almost all of his life in fighting the battles of the oppressed. : The occasion of his visit- to Vancouver at this time, is as he Says, “te see that every man, woman and child in Canada (shall) realize what kind of 2 biased, prejudiced trial Pred Rose was given” on the charge that he, as they allege, imparted information and engaged in conspiracy against the interest of Canada. Councillor Buhay is now, just where we should expect to find a man with such a record as his—at the head of the Fred Rose Defence Committee. And his tour of the country is for the pur- pose stated in the foregoing paragraph. He has been in the trade union movement for the last 45 years, always in the most progressive wing of it, active in building and strengthening it for the improvement of the workers’ lot. In that labor struggle he has won the confidence of the masses in his part of the world so that they elected him .to the Montreal City Council in 1942 where he fulfillea his election promises so well that in the following election they doubled his winning vote. He is a fearless, tireless and consistent advocate of the com- munity’s needs in one of the most reactionary centers in Canada, the birthplace and home of the infamous Padlock Law and other measures inspired by fascism—Montreal. it is quite in line with his whole life’s recora that Mike Buhay is now fighting to expose the frame-up of Fred Rose by- profit- mongers in Canada, nineteen years almost to the day after like- minded elements in the U.S. sent Sacco and Vanzetti to the electric ehair. Mike will speak in the Boilermakers’ Halt on the last Sunday of this month and along with him on the platform will be John Stanton, one of the few members of the. Canadian public to “crash the gate” at the Fred Rose trial which was practically a star chamber affair. Stanton is a lawyer. He knows the routine in these places where trials are held. Hie knows the concepts of freedom and justice that rule the courts. He is well-fitted to eriticize the kan= 8areo Character of that particular court. His impressions of the trial will be well worth hearing. Don’t miss hearing these two speakers. ° e One of the major crimes of Civilization in its Capitalists world advance is the extermination of aborig— inal peoples. The claim that these die out for the reason that as individuals they cannot adapt themselves to new conditions of life, is a corny one. It is only: a half-truth. Certainly the native peoples resist the exploitation which one section of the civilized faces practice on another section of their Own race. That, however, is net a race matter, it is a class. question. It is well exemplified in the contemptuous way the eapitalist rulers of society today deal with the native peoples, particularly here in B.C. A Victoria journalist is responsible for a story printed in an Eastern paper about the founding of the first Canadian branch of an organization known as the Society for the Preserva-— tion of the Cigar Store Indian. “It follows naturally, that such an organization should be composed, for the most part, of members of the class who exploit white workers as well as workers of every other color. From the published names of some of the sponsors of this in- sult to the original American people, this opinion is borne out, Only two names of the branch launched in the swank Victoria club are listed and they both have a familiar ring to the exploited loggers of B.C——J. H. Bloedel and R. D. Merrill. Among the few adherents in the U.S. whose response was enthusiastic, four only are mentioned by name and of these three are easily amongst the most despicable individuals in that country. Col. (7) Robert McCormick, of the Chicago Tribune, for ex ample; labor-hating cheer leader for everything reactionary in Capitalist society, “a natural for such an invitation”; another is George E. Sokolsky, Hearst columnist, whose literary efforts in Leningrad were so offensive and counter-revolutionary in 1918, that the sailors of the Baltic fleet raidea his print shop and smashed his printing presses, but unfortunately allowed him to escape with a whole skin from his just deserts; and Upton Close, whose anti- Soviet fulminations on the American air-waves were SO vicious that now no firm can be found to sponsor a program for him and no Station will allow him on the air even if he should find a sponsor. A society made up of such a collection of labor-hating Big Business elements and their literary stooges and hirelings may eat Chinook breakfasts and have a good time to themselves about Cigar Store Indians, but they will make no move to do anything for the real flesh and blood Indians who are victims, along with the white workers, of the system of exploitation and robbery that enables them to eat Chinook breakfasts. The imperialist wiseacres at the Peace Con- ference who still insist on the international- ization of Trieste appear to be like the Bour- bons in one respect, “they learn nothing”! In spite of the fact that Trieste is an integral part of Yugoslavia and that the Yugoslavs lost 1,500,000 of their people as the contribution to the defeat of fascism, almost double the combined losses of the British and Americans—the imperialists persist in their effort to make Trieste into another Tangier. Tangier has been an international city since 1911, but today, after 35 years, the Moors are demonstrating in the streets demand- ing the return of the city to their own rule, with the slogan “Morocco for the Moors.’ That should be a lesson to statesmen who desire to establish a peaceful world. But the Yugoslavs have the most realistic under standing of the question, as they have of many others—for that is one country that has wiped out the black market. FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 1946 Internationai