/6. May 13th, 1974

change took place.
7. It has been proven by using the example of other amalgamations. that...
there will be no monetary gain for our citizens. | |
8. We have always been willing to co-operate with our neighbouring munic=
ipalities as shown by our leadership in the Justice Building. |

_We do not support or agree with the idea. of amalgamation. and, therefore. @
a study is not needed."

Moved by Alderman Keryluk:

Seconded by Alderman Laking:

That the report from Mayor Campbell, May 13th, 1974, proposing certain
points be included in reply to a letter from Premier David Barrett, May 6th,
1974, wherein it was stated that the Provincial Government would be willing
to fund the cost of a study on the pros and cons of amalgamation for School
District No. 43 (Coquitlam), be approved. . _ Carried.

Alderman Thompson voted against the resolution.

‘Prior to passage of the foregoing resolution, a discussion ensued and
while members of Council generally were opposed to a study on amalgamation
in School District No. 43 (Coquitlam) being undertaken, Alderman Thompson
stated that the actual pros and cons of amalgamation were not necessarily _
involved; the point being whether a study should be done of this area to ‘see
if amalgamation is sensible or not and he thought much useful information

could be gathered therefrom.

LMPAA-notice of From the Lower Mainland Parks Advisory Association, May 8th, 1974, ad-, os
meeting ; : : m ote as :

vising that the next meeting of the Associatbn will be held at the Burnaby |
Lake Pavilion, Burnaby, on Thursday, May 23rd, 1974, commencing at 6:00 p.m.
Alderman Traboulay indicated that he and his wife would be in attendance. ;

REPORTS:

Plan.& Zon.Comm. From the Planning & Zoning Committee, May 10th, 1974, concerning Strata
Appln.SS#8-74 Cones :
Title Application SS#8-74 for strata subdivision of Property bounded by
Vincent Street, Salisbury Avenue, Sefton Street, and Dorset Avenue, advising |
that the project will consist of 36 town-house units divided into two blocks
- one facing Vincent Street and the other facing Sefton Street - and reconmen~
ding approval subject to the owner following the City's strata title proce- |
dure.
. Mr. E. Anderson, representing the developer, M& W Construction Ltd.,
was in attendance at the meeting and on invitation from Mayor Campbell, i1-
lustrated a coloured rendering of the project and other plans, and he men~
_ tioned that there were two errors in the Committee's report - one was that

there would be 34 units, not 36 - and the other that the owner has deposited