llig “ 800,000-member federation ization for LABOR Labor mobilizing for jobs and to scuttle free trade TORONTO — April 26 is the target date for a massive pro- vince-wide demonstration by the Ontario Federation of Labor against Free Trade and for Jobs. An extensive organizing drive is being launched by the in- cluding the production of re- search and education materials to arm Ontario trade unionists with the necessary information to combat the big business and Tory propaganda in favor of free trade with the U.S. In an interview, Dec. 19, OFL ‘ president Cliff Pilkey said the federation is planning to hold a series of 20 public forums on Fee Trade and Jobs throughout the province as a build-up and mobil- the April 26 demonstration in Toronto. At the same time he stressed the importance of OFL affiliates pulling out all the stops to ensure the broadest possible mobiliza- tion of their members. The April 26 rally, he said, has to be a giant protest to be effective, and that it will require an effort by the lead- ers of the OFL’s affiliated unions to ensure that participation goes beyond the attendance of officers and staff. The campaign will intimately connect the fight against free trade to the fight for jobs, Pilkey said. The OFL executive council, Dec. 17, approved the details of the mobilizing campaign which had been discussed and reviewed on the previous day at a meeting of the representatives of the OFL’s affiliated unions. The rally will take place on the eve of the biennial Canadian Labor Congress convention which is also taking place in To- ronto and where labor’s mobil- ization against free trade will be a top item on the agenda. Labor councils will be encour- aged to form local committees against free trade as part of the build-up for the demonstration. The Dec. 16 meeting of union leaders and the campaign against free trade sprang from both the 1984 OFL convention decision to organize a province-wide March for Jobs, (which never got off the drawing board), as well as a pol- icy statement at this year’s con- vention which, after a referral organized by the Action Caucus, mapped out a program to mobilize against free trade. The fight to stop a free trade agreement with the U.S. is one of the most critical tasks facing Canadian working people, Pilkey said. ‘‘Free trade would mean we would lose up to 280,000 manu- facturing jobs in Ontario and it would impact on the cultural, political and economic sovereignty of this country’’, he stated. ‘‘Eventually we would be something like another state in the US. ‘Secondly, the free traders, are in the main, advocates of the so-called free enterprise system with a ‘survival of the fittest-dog- eat-dog’ mentality. That’s what they’re saying when they talk about free trade.”’ He went on to predict that free trade would put the survival of many smaller manufacturers at stake. ‘They ll face the mammoth productive ability of the U.S., and I’m not at all convinced that we can compete in that kind of an environment,”’ he said. While not an advocate of a branch plant economy, the OFL leader pointed out that free trade would make it easier for U.S. corporations to move their Cana- dian operations back across the border. Pilkey also warned of the dam- age a free trade arrangement would wreak on our network of social services and benefits. “‘There is an alternative to all this’’, Pilkey said. ‘‘We ought to - be looking at developing an in- dustrial and economic strategy for this country that addresses our needs, not tying ourselves to U.S. economic strategy. “We're not saying that Canada shouldn’t remain a trading nation, but we ought not to put all of our eggs in one basket, let’s develop our trade internationally on a worldwide basis.”’ GIFTS Fon MoOERN PROFITS Dik DRWE AND VOT PSAC says job security top issue OTTAWA — Federal public works component members of the Public Service Alliance of Canada backed up contract demands with a demonstration, Dec. 11, outside the buidling in which a govern- ment conciliation board was deal- ing with their contract demands. The workers, federal govern- ment power, heating and station- ary engineers are part of a 2,150 member group within the PSAC’s public works component and have been without a contract since July 6, 1984. PSAC recently broke off nego- tiations with the government and asked for a conciliation com- mission after six fruitless bargain- ing sessions in which manage- ment refused to provide strict job security language in the contract, protection against the adverse ef- fects of tech change, and a decent wage package. The stationary engineers are the first group of government workers under the Public Service Staff Relations Act to begin talks with a conciliation board. In addi- tion to wages, job security and tech change, the items referred to the conciliation hearings Dec. 11-13 included vacations, hours of work, overtime and contract length. PSAC wants a $1.15 an hour raise in a two year deal end- ing next July 7. Jobs, wages, shorter hours on 86 agenda By DAVE WERLIN Since the formation of the Canadian labor movement, there has been a con- Stancy to the demands of working people. We want full employment. We want a wage that will provide us with a decent standard of living, both during our work lives and in ourretirement. We want a safe and clean work environment. Most of all, we want a fair share of the fruits of our labor. A share that reflects _ the dramatic improvements in pro- duction brought about by scientific and technical advances. That is: not happening. Current unemployment rates are the worst this country has witnessed since the great depression of the 1930s. In a society where being without work is an automatic guarantee of poverty and treatment as a second class citizen, there are now officially 1,183,000 Canadians unemployed. Best estimates of the real -humbers of unemployed usually run 30 per cent higher than the official rate. Employers, both public and private, have used these high unemployment rates to launch a savage, unethical attack upon union rights and benefit levels. Furthermore, provincial governments, have instituted a two-pronged attack upon working Canadians. There Are Alternatives Regressive, anti-union labor laws have restricted the ability of unions at the bargaining table, and resulted in wage settlements far below the increase in the cost of living, while at the same time governments have been cutting back on those social services which provide a _ safety net for the working poor and the - unemployed. The situation working Canadians are faced with then, is one of declining in- comes and increasing unemployment in an economy increasingly dependent upon raw material exports as manu- facturing declines. There are however alternatives. The labor movement has proposed reduced worktime with no loss in pay as a partial solution to unemployment. We are aiming for a four-day, 32 hour work-week with no loss in pay. We aren’t sure how long it will take us to achieve this aim in Canada, but that is the trend in Europe and it is an objective to which labor in Canada is committed. The problems associated with the eco- nomic direction the country is pursuing will, of course, take political solutions. That, if anything, is the critical area for working people today. We are being forced by the govern- ment’s endorsement of free trade, monetarist fiscal policies, and reduction of social benefits, to become more poli- tical in our fight to create a society with an equitable distribution of wealth. Moreover, I think that we will see an increasingly militant labor movement in this country as working people begin to reject the bleak future proposed by the corporate vision of the world. The escalation of the monpolization of our resources, largely by foreign capital and the resultant export of jobs, the con- cessions bargaining by our employers, the deregulation of our industries and the drive toward free trade with the U.S., has, however, caused Canadian working people to begin to envisage, in the not too distant future, a Canadian version of life in a third world setting. So what should be done about the situation? What does labor want in 1986? What Labor Wants We cannot and will not continue to accept the high level of unemployment that exists in our wealthy, resource-rich country, with one of the most highly skil- led labor forces in the western world. Nor are we prepared to tighten our Backgrounder belts, accept concessions at the bargain- ing table or accept a further decline in the standard of living of working people in exchange for relief from joblessness. We will become more and more in- volved in the political arena where we will slowly and eventually stall the drive toward free trade by that or any other name. During the crisis of unemployment and rising poverty in the land, what is re- quired is improved rather than decreased unemployment insurance benefits. The labor movement calls for benefits for people seeking their first job since enter- ing the work force, benefits which are at least equal to the poverty level estab- lished by Statistics Canada and payable for the full duration of unemployment. The burden of taxation continues to be shifted, by all levels of government from the corporate elite to the working people, including the poor and the under- privileged. We must therefore continue to press Mulroney to fulfill that other famous election promise that the rich will pay their fair share of taxes and that the loop-holes that allow thousands of rich Canadians to escape paying any taxes at all will be eliminated. In order that Canadian workers can achieve what is their just due, a fair share of the wealth they produce, we must also restore free collective bargaining. In a society in which women play an increasingly important role in production and in all aspects of our social fabric, we can no longer accept the time-worn arguments that it is not possible to de- velop the criteria necessary to establish the basis in Alberta for equal pay for work of equal value. Working women are entitled, no less than their male counterparts in the work force to a fair share of what they pro- duce. Enough Is Enough For too long, too many working people have swallo‘ved the big lies — you are pricing yourselves out of the market, you must tighten your belts, you must be- come more productive, you must be- come more competitive, you must understand and accept unemployment as a fact of life. And while you are doing these noble things, you must not be upset if you notice that big business is reaping maximum profit as your standard of liv- ing declines. Enough is enough, or rather too much is enough. It’s back to the bargaining table and into the political arena. What we want in 1986 is fulfillment of the de- mand of the unemployed in their On To Ottawa Trek 50 years ago ‘‘Work and Wages’’. Dave Werlin is president of the Alberta Federation of Labor. This article was exerpted from a recent address he gave to a meeting sponsored by the Conference Board of Canada. Ee PACIFIC TRIBUNE, JANUARY 15, 1986 « 5