April 5th, 1976

Act and on the basis that the number af lots proposed to be created be

reduced from fifteen to fourteen. Carried.
Aldermen Ranger and Traboulay voted aguiust the resolution.

Prior to passage of the foregoing resolution, Alderman Ranger stated
he was opposed to the proposed subdivision due to the frontages of the lots
being too narrow; however, Alderman Laking stated he felt the size of the

lots to be satisfactory. In answer to a query from Alderman Keryluk, the

City Engineer advised that the developer would be totally responsible for

constructing Suffolk Avenue, Alderman Traboulay also expressed concern
‘with respect co the with of the lot frontages; however, a representative
of the Developer, who was in attendance at the meeting, pointed out that
the lots are a minimum of 5,400 square feet. Alderman Thomspon commented
that a senior governmental body had pointed out on numerous occasions that
the large let concept is a luxury that will soon not be enjoyed, and as

reasonable use is being made of the land, stated he supported the proposal.

icity Eng. re “rom the City Engineer, April lst, 1976, submitting a print of Drawing

‘min. Ffrtg.ex. Subdiv.
-Lot 1021,P1L. No. 209-70 outlining a proposed 28-lot subdivision of Lot 1021, Plan 48410,

/24841L0-—(Eastern Dr.)
is situated on Eastern Drive, and advising that the lots reet the Subdivision
of Land By-law in every way with the exception of frontage.

Moved by Alderman Laking;

Seconded by Alderman Ke: yluk:

That as recommended in a memorandum from the City Engineer, April Ist,
1976, a frontage exemption in accordance with Section 712(2) of the Municipal
Act be granted with respect to a proposed 28-lot Subdivision of Lot 1021,
Plan 48410, situated on Eastern Drive. Carried.

Prior to passage of the foregoing resolution, Alderman Ranger iuquired

as to the route the children generated from this Subdivision will take to and

from the Helen Trembath Elementary School, and the City Engineer advised that

atta

wae

without too much work a walkway could be provided to the School by an exten-

sion of Western Drive. Alderman Ranger stated he thought the developer should
assume some of the responsibility in providing access across the Hydro Right-
of-Way towards the school or at least up to the Southern side of ‘Paula Place.
Alderman Ranger then pointed out that the lots are once again under the size
required in the Subdivision By-law, and stated he did not agree with this
concept in subdivisions where standard-sized lots can be created; however

the City Engineer advised that all lots have to meet the minimum 5,400 square

foot size as there is no provision for exemption thereon.

or

2