( a inlnteeomace v were ch nf Admin tre tive: officer: i D.. - Polloc * city Clerk

OR. Ae Freenan,, ‘City ‘tngineer Wit Borch;” PE Eng) Planning Officer Xk. Je “Stinson,

Fire 2 Chief W Se “Wingrove, Recreation Di rector Miss J. Ky Taylor, and Mest cy Me alten,

ZONING PUBLIC HEARING: :
His. Sorship Nayor w By Seott’ advised | the meet 8 he following proposed orn “He
“to amend ‘the city. of Port ‘Coquitian Zoning By-law, 1969, wo. 918" vould now be.

‘considered:

1. Bylaw wine rezone Lots. Le & Qe Block I, ‘District Lot: 255, “Group one, tee
“Plan 2106, New Westminster Distri fet, from RS=2 (One-Famdty | Suburban Residential)
to RSL: (Gne-Fanily Residential). : : Pa | |
“This property is located at 1796 Langan Avenue: and’ ait is expected that: a ce
. €amily” residence will be constructed thereon foie owing ‘completion of the fe rezon-
‘ing: pescedurta’: | cee : Q ae
~No"one was pres esent’ in ‘opposition « to. the’ foregoing. proposed Zoning By-law.

fuendments

2 By-law Now 1231: to anend Sections 501" and 502 of the Zoning By-law to. o restr-By-law No
a ict. che "Permitted Use" of: One-Famty: Residential’ authorized by Section 501 to

“the: ‘RSL: (One=Panily’ Residential) zone “and: REZ (one-Fantly Suburban Residen-

“Hal zone. and ‘to restrict ‘the “permitted Use" of two-Fanily Residential auth- an

“orized: by. Section 50m | to- the: RS=1 \one-Fantly Residential) zone.” .

“this ayelaw will affect all property in: ‘the city presently zoned’ AML. Gow

‘Density Apartment Residential) or Ri? (edi Apartment Residential).

Ag ‘requested by His” Worship the Mayor, the Planning Officer: eqlained that
spplieations are being’ received: to construct ‘single-family dvellings* in areas: sae ae
sently zoned RMHL or’ REZ, ‘whieh’ would conflict” wi th multiple’ development, ‘aad the
wrsased amendment” would ~ ‘remove. - the ‘one-fanily designation as a permitted use. :

“Me. Poul: Hansen, an sn Arehitect £ from New Westiinster, inquired whether or: ‘not.
condominiums would be: tneluded’ in: the: single-fanily restriction and the Pi teag 8
officer advised that although such units: are’ privately-owned, ‘they 3 are classified Sue
as multiple family. | | |
No one: was i ee ae

‘Anendiient's”