Page 6 July 11, 1990. This Week tte MODERN LIVING KE Bad manners among lawyers not an asset EAR MISS MANNERS — I happen to work in one of the professions in which being rude often gets results when being polite does not. lam a lawyer. Ofcourse many lawyers are polite and respond well to courtesy. But a significant number interpret courtesy as a sign of weakness and insist on a level of intimacy that would make a talk-show host \iss=ViGnners: By JUDITH MARTIN blush. Ordinary formality (such as the use of “Mr.” or “Ms.”) is interpreted as an ominous threat and treated accordingly. Male colleagues at co-ed luncheons give detailed descrip- tions of the conception and delivery of their children. Supe- riors comment publicly on ordi- nary costume jewelry (pearls!) and hair color. An executive recruiter tells me that a prospec- tive employer is on anti- psychotic medication. An interviewer informs me that an acquaintance has left his employ because she had a men- tal breakdown as a result of her job. Married peers (men) regularly ask me if I am now dating anyone. Receptionists snap: “You weren't cut off. You were discon- nected.” Adversaries hang up in- stead of politely saying, “See you in court.” And it isn’t just me. A friend, who is also extremely proper, recently received an unbelievab- ly personal and obscene letter from an adversary. I'm beginning to suspect that one must be willing to roll in the mud in order to practice law. But - I just cannot stoop to this level. I don’t expect miracles and I don’t expect to substitute cour- tesy for competence. But it seems to me that unless we maintain some standards, the profession will become un- bearable. GENTLE READER — A great many people do believe that the profession is becoming unbearable, Miss Manners regrets to say. These people do not need lawyers to defend them from the results of making such a charge. They are lawyers. In bar associations all over, lit- tle Miss Mannerses (not that you'd immediately recognize them as such) are busy drawing up etiquette guides (not that they necessarily call them that) for the legal profession. It is not only the occasional incident where lawyers have resorted to fisticuffs that has upset them; it © is a general deterioration of the standards of what should be a gentlemanly and ladylike, albeit tough, profession. Miss Manners must gently point out that you, too, suffer from the idea that rudeness is a professional asset, although you don’t want to indulge in it. Nonsense. Judges, juries and clients respond to politeness and are offended by rudeness. And lawyers could not use rudeness to intimidate other lawyers without their cooperation. You should stop cooperating. It is as much your privilege to insist “I prefer to be addressed as Ms. Blackburn” as it is another lawyer’s request “Call me Joe.” It seems to Miss Manners to be professional weakness if you simply yield and let him make the rules. Personal revelations and questions should be treated as irrelevant. “I don’t care to dis- cuss it” or “Tl let you continue your gossip, but I have to get pack to work” may be said polite- y. And when someone indulges in violations of professional con- fidence to you, the least you can do is to respond: “Oh, really? Is he making that ‘public knowledge?” Indeed, the law, like most professions is, as you say, tough. Miss Manners would think that anyone practicing it successfully would have to have the strength to set her own standards and not give in to bullies. DEAR MISS MANNERS — How should I decline an invita- tion to a bridal luncheon that says: “I will attend — $25 “Unable to attend — $107? GENTLE READER — Having spent a lifetime trying to persuade people to answer their social invitations, Miss Man- ners cannot find it in her heart to browbeat anyone into paying an unauthorized bill. DEAR MISS MANNERS — Chances are my husband will die before I do: I am 71, and he is 84. All my family, four brothers and one sister, live 2,000 miles from us. When the time comes, would it be proper for me to tell them not to come because of the expense? The airport is an hour’s drive from here. We live in a very small apartment, so they would have to go to a hotel, plus pay for the cabs. Would they feel obligated? Would they feel hur'# if I told them not to come? GENTLE READER — How ever practical it may seem t anticipate bereavement, Mis: Manners wishes to discouragi you from doing so. This is not 01 the grounds of taste, but becaus emotions are unpredictable When the death actually occurs you may well crave the comfor of having your family with you. Ifyou still feel, when announc ing the death, that you can spar their presence, gently tell ther that their appearance at thi # funeral is less important to you than a real visit later. This would enable them to make the choice of attending or not, a decision which you should ac- cept gracefully. When you go out in. the woods today... an you remember the words to Teddy Bear’s Picnic? I get halfway through and then fumble on the “see them gaily playing there” part. It is essential that I get the words right because I sing it continually when we are out Teddy Bear’s Picnic, however, is perfect. I can march slowly while singing off key. I've got to sing something. When hiking in bear country, it is only fair to warn’the bear that I am on the trail. As the hiking books advise, we each have a tiny camel bell tied to our packs so that it tinkles with each step. Bears are afraid of camels, and if one thinks in the woods. My mumbling is causing my hiking companions to throw dirty looks and sticks my way. Hither I learn the words or I'll have to carry the lunch in my pack every trip. Sure, there are other hiking songs, but I can’t think of them in pressure cooker situations. When I am out in the woods, carrying salmon sandwiches, I believe there is a bear behind every tree, so only bear songs come to mind. When I am at home and calm I prepare a program of hiking songs, but on the trail there is something wrong with every one of them. Many of them call for yodelling. I only yodel in the car, with the windows up. Some have tempos that tangle my feet. The one with the “Val de ree, val de raw” refrain is especially bad, because it requires me to walk really fast to keep with the beat. Travelling uphill, it almost killed me. a whole herd of them is com- ing, he'll split. There is always the dange®. Ei JS AG that a stupid bear will mis- : Ef e take a camel bell for a cow bell and come looking for dinner. To prevent such a visit, we talk loudly. When we tire of- talking, we sing. All the out- door enthusiasts recommend it. What makes them assume that bears are afraid of music? Have they never heard of the | famous dancing bears in the Moscow circus? Perhaps there av By JOAN MYLES are singalong bears too. My fear is that some day I will be singing as I march along the trail and a bear will start to hum along. “You’re sadly out of tune,” he'll say. “Those aren’t the right words,” he’ll correct. “Don’t you know any other songs ?Pick up the beat. I can’t dance to that.” No wonder I’m afraid of bears. This Week An Island Publishers Newsmagazine V8W 1M9 #30-727 Johnson Street, Victoria, British Columbia Jim Cunningham, Publisher Tony Kant, Editor 381-3484 This Week wants to help you plan Next Week, and the week after .. . Put us on your mailing list for announcements of upcoming events that are regional in nature and we’ll do our best to include them in our calendar section at no charge. Your submissions should be as concise as possible and typewritten to facilitate processing. Don’t forget to include a phone number where you can be reached should we require further informa- tion. Sorry, we cannot accept announcements by telephone. Mail your submissions to: This Week/Events Suite-30 727 Johnson St. Victoria, V8W 1M9