ae a | r Ce rm bee tlt — Ca = TO Yo Vn WOON — OSS J semen Ay! Deval a We: Sa we Very few people could have predicted with any assurances what has shaped up this first year of the 70’s. Internationally, it has been marked by an historic peace offensive on the part of the Soviet Union, an offensive which found its expression in the trea- ties between West Germany and the Soviet Union, West Germany and Po- land, the four-power agreement on West Berlin. the Indian-Soviet Treaty and the Egyptian-Soviet Treaty. This peace. offensive has gone to- gether, indeed has merged, with an up- 4° surge of the national and social libera- tion struggles of the peoples on all the continents of the globe. Latin America is on the march. The currents of change are continuing in Africa. The powerful and heroic actions of the peoples of Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos, backed by the socialist community of states and the peoples of the world, have stayed the hand of U.S. imperialism and in- flicted serious military defeats on it. And‘ as 1971 ends a new and vital force has been added to the growing camp of social and national liberation —the people of Bangla Desh. * * * These events illustrate the fact that the balance of forces is shifting more and more in favor of the forces of peace, democracy, independence and socialism. They also point to the breakdown of Not least the first year of the 70’s has been marked by a further upsurge of the struggles of the working class. The argument that the working class has become bourgeoisified, middle class, lost its revolutionary perspective, is be- ing disproved daily. Unevenly from country to country, but expressed in all the advanced capitalist countries, is the fact that the working class is mov- ing increasingly to the centre of the stage and is attracting to itself all those forces affected by monopoly pol- icy. One can therefore say that thisDecade of the 70’s, which the mass media tried to depict as a decade of great promise and promises, has opened as the Decade of Great Change. * * * What is evidenced here is the process of international detente which goes side by side with the continued effort of imperialism to maintain international tension, keep the cold war going, try to change the direction of world his- tory and the balance of world forces. This is particularly evident in the shifting tactics of the Nixon Adminis- tration. Compelled to face up to the reality of the changing relationship of forces, it speaks of negotiations replac- ing confrontation, but instead pursues both at the same time. It speaks of normalization of relations and in that “spirit” has opened negotiations with participation in the struggle for peace. This was made particularly evident in the mass upsurge against the U.S. nuc- lear tests in Amchitka which merged with growing opposition to continued U.S. aggression in Indochina. It was made no less evident in the dramatic struggles which have unfolded in Que- bec, evidence of the fact that the French-Canadian working class is in- creasingly moving to the forefront of the struggle. From both ends, so to speak, the working class of English and French Canada is sharpening the strug- gle against monopoly and its policies. What is particularly evident in this opening year of the Decade of the 70’s is the powerful upsurge of opposition to U.S. domination and support for Canadian indpendence. From a minor- ity movement initiated and led by the Communist Party it has virtually be- come a majority movement. The ques- tion now has become not so much whether there shall be an active effort to achieve Canadian independence, but what policies to pursue to achieve it. The catalyst for this change in public atti- tudes arises from growing realization of the ugly role of U.S. imperialism in Vietnam and now the breakdown of the “special relationship” which U.S. and Canadian monopoly had _ established over the years, evidenced particularly in the dollar crisis and the efforts of U.S. imperialism to solve it at the ex- the cold war edifice U.S. imperialism the People’s Republic of China, not to pense of its allies and the working peo- has built up in the post war, an edifice normalize relations but to seek for ple of the USA and the whole capitalist backed by its economic and ey Soy Oe ean 0 | Ss ee, ays world. | might and by NATO, all directed to ‘ ’ Se This change in public attitude : “contain,” “roll back” and defeat the communist movement and the anti-im- fapethier oe - : aninned edort By 4 forces striving to put an end to war perialist forces throughout the world. monopoly groups and their political H and the system which breeds it. While It speaks of withdrawal from Vietnam spokesmen to veer towards an ever ¥ the cold war edifice has not been com- _— While spreading aggression to all of = fn. integration of the Canadian eco- | pletely dismantled, it can be said that Indochina and escalating the air war in nomy with U.S. imperialism and to ij the peoples of the world have compelled Victnant, : make Canada increasingly a “hewer of ¢@ the cold warriors to retreat. The issue of peace or war is far trom wood and drawer of water, gas and oil.” Not least, it can be said that the main backbone of the cold war, U.S. im- perialism, has suffered a series of seri- ous defeats. The Decade of the 70’s, and 1971 in particular, may go down in history as marking the end of an era, the end of the dominance of the U.S. dollar and of U.S. imperialist domination. The cur- rency crisis and the devaluation of the U.S. dollar mirrored this process, - which in fact had been developing over a period of time, and drew attention to the fact that the post-war capitalist world, built in the image of U.S. im- perialism and under its domination, has begun to crumble, that the stability it thought it had achieved was cf short duration, that inter-imperialist agree- ments had turned into sharpened con- tradictions and rivalry. : * The instability of the capitalist world, demonstrated in the sick U.S. dollar and the currency crisis, is further em- phasized in the marked inability of state monopoly capitalism to prevent economic crises, unemployment, stag- nation and inflation. These have now _ become more clearly evident in all capi- talist countries. Indeed, what is of sig- nificance is not that they are expressed in all the advanced capitalist states, but that they erupt in all of them almost simultaneously. settled. It remains the central problem in the struggle between imperialism and socialism and the forces of peace, democracy and independence on a world-wide scale. * & * The rapidity of change internation- ally, which has been characteristic of developments of the first year of the 70’s, is matched to-some degree by the changes taking place in our own coun- try, highlighted by the visits exchanged by Canadian and Soviet leaders and the agreements they signed. One has only to recall how quickly Trudeaumania has diminished in size, the growing criticism of the govern- ment by those forces which helped give it the majority in the last federal elec- tions. : One has only to recall what appeared to be massive support for the govern- ment’s action in imposing the War Measures Act and the Public Order (Temporary Measures) Act, with the growing opposition evident, particular- ly in the organized labor movement, to these draconic and virtually dictatorial measures, all of which compelled the government to withdraw these meas- ures. The first year of the 70’s points up the growing militancy of the working class, its greater political awareness, and class consciousness, its increasing * * * What is basically involved is the di- rection Canada should take. The strug- gles around this issue, around the issues of the economic and social policy, of the foreign and trade policies, of jobs or guaranteed income as a right with the people enjoying the fruits of techno- logical change, are related to what kind of future there is to be for the people of our country and for the young gen- eration. This will occupy the coming decade and will be fought out on every issue, no matter how big, no matter how small. It will be a decisive part of the coming federal elections in 1972, of the political realignments which are now developing between those forces which wish to push politics further to the right and those, based on the work- ing class and democratic forces, which strive to push politics to the left—in the direction of those new policies Can- ada and the working people need to achieve for a great democratic advance and to bring about a democratic coali- tion as the pathway to the advance to socialism. . It goes without saying that the Com- munist Party, which just celebrated its 50th anniversary and held its 21st (50th Anniversary) Convention, will make an increasingly vital contribution in 1972 to this Decade of Great Change. !oecennnuencanuuananacecanuvangnuucesnnuarasguengsucegsnuengsnuesgsguenegnueeggstseeggqieesgvseeggusseesau sueeeensuoeanuuaeasasenesnscangnducengscnanaseneagucegatueensvseeggnsveegsuvaesavunegnasceyengaaeaneadiavenataeaayuucesiatuesavnisengyi , PACIFIC TRIBUNE—FRIDAY,, DECEMBER 31, 197,1-PAGE5 = ie w