~~~;-:,gjlF::=; 'jiiijjf Ilh g&~[/ ~ J(')j[ilhSli ',~pllllS ~ @p ~/ g[gg g)lh easy = RLI& IHRg gl - ~WS THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF POP.T CO@~ BtABRO~AL PRCYIECHON COMMITTEE Wednesday, October 30, 1991 Second Floor Meeting Room 2580 Shaughnessy Street, Port Coquitlam, BC 5:00 p.m. PERSONNEL IN ATTENDANCE: DELEGATION: Representative of Intrawest e~,~ ITEM I: CONATION OF MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING ITEM II: DELEGATION - INTRAWEST (Report from Deputy Fngineer dated October 23, 1991) ITEM III: SOIL REMOVAL/DEPOSIT BYLAW CURRENT STATUS (Report from Deputy City Engineer attached) lll1'TEM IV: — NEW BUSINESS -Rl ~jg j5tgg,gag pgl. a ~',~'~~tatlha- ~&g ~$ ggtts tita&gg ~[JSI, hij ~»sitittl I $ y -""", ta:;=.'=Sea a~, ~:,: ~g]~g/g) /$ P 'gp t~ ~ EI1RILHRMllsa~g+& Wgggg gjjj ~g / 4 — — -=---Q~SH ns~@l[j ~~~~~~))+ u~t ~e~ ))()asmulfll an/QPij~- " -: Q s /Qiana~ ~~ jjllslstjgI ~) — — "-- — — M~t ~ = llg a THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PORT COQUITLAM MEMORANDUM DATE: October 24, 1991 TO: Environmental Protection Committee FROM: C.F. (Kip) Gaudry, P. Eng. Deputy City Engineer SUB JECT: INIRAWEST SITE - SBAUGHNBSSY AND LOUGHEED RECO~ATIONt That Committee recommend that Council formally advise the owners of the Intrawest Site at Shaughnessy and Lougheed that we are not supportive of any further subdivision or development of the properties in question until all contamination and remediation have been satisfactorily addressed. B~IROUND & COMMENTS: As reported to the Environmental Protection Committee July 30, 1991, Igor Zahynacz and I met with Glen Sigurdson and Danny Zadak of lntrawest Ltd. to discuss the contamination and proposed remediation plans for their property at Shaughnessy and Lougheed. A copy of this report is attached and is self explanatory. We promised in our meeting that we would approach at least the Environmental Protection Committee for their comments regarding this particular developtnent and it is the purpose of this report to reconunend that Committee consider asking Council to endorse a resolution that the remediation plan must be fully and satisfactorily in place before any further development or subdivision takes place. r THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PORT COQUITLAM IN p ) 5'zr CO~E MEMO~IJM DATE: August 2, 1991 TO: B.R. Kirk City Administrator FROM: C.F. Gaudry, P. Eng., Deputy City Engineer S UB JECT: Intrawest Site (Environmental Protection Committee Meeting, July 31, 1991) Pecommendatiorn For information Backaround and Comments: The Environmental Protection Committee dealt with the attached report from the Deputy City Engineer on July 31, 1991 at its regular meeting. As an update to the report, the City Engineering Department has now received a three volume report in access of 400 pages in length. It s available in the Engineering Office for any who would like to review the contents. It will be read, evaluated, and summarized to report form by the Engineering Department by September. While the Environmental Protection Committee continues to monitor and deal with the matter, they felt it important that Mayor and Council be apprised of the latest developments and information that is available. C.F. (Kip) Gaudry, P. Eng. Deputy City Engineer CFG:gc cc: I.R. Zahynacz, P. Eng., City Engineer Ilk&~Z~ I ! III ~~»i~ ~ij&ej,~~~ tajj —.'--j»'Sa'Sjjl!1eajjmejjP '" -".,'„':~ g~-=~,:;a =."=-SWI~~III[ygImatierg gfjj ~gjilg5$ 1.. ~~a~j j jg g &g t gg '~sggpj QQjjZjjgg/jjallRIIRa Rial aupp jj gj — jjjgajla~lllsmaaiaS &gal j '~~~ Islttltljj a'est i~t;, — itBi$ 1 ~11 THURBER ENvlRGN&v&ENTAIL'".'I( !'" a&',.», n~~i~~~&~ CONSULTANTS LTO. I THURBER &fit)j)."] July 31, 1991 File: 19-483 21 — Intrawest Development Corporation 6th Floor, 1111 West Hastings Street Vancouver, B.C. V6E 2J3 Attention: Mr. Bob Mason Vice President HOME CENTRE REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION FINAL REPORT Dear Sirs& are pleased to present our final report on the nature Because of the size of the document, we have had 15 copies printed and professionally bound. Five copies have been distributed as indicated. We will hold the remainder and will distribute them as directed. In the interim, should. you have any questions or wish to discuss our report, please contact us at your convenience. We and extent of contamination at the Home Centre. Yours very truly, Thurber Environmental Consultants Ltd. Colin T. Maber Review Principal /~, 4 Joseph G. Alesi Senior Environmental Consultant JGA/v Enclosure Sigurdson, Taylor MacCaffery Chapman Sigurdson Igor Zahynacz, P.Eng., Municipal Engineer, City of Port Coquitlam B.K. Martin, Director, Commercial Projects, CP Rail John Wiens, Ph.D., Head Contaminated Sites Unit, MoE Louise Ouelle+, p.Eng., Environmental Safety Program, MoE Robert Shephard, P.Eng., Environment Canada, Conservation and Protection, Pacific and Yukon Region G.A. - ~r ll'=BcIilIRI IIPSllagj" is -..-; -'„,."~I!mr~= — --.-!a!meegl~ !!!!B~~==ml ', I''' 0's,~!::==-.I: =--:::":=- ,'~lha~~ll~gl]R, " 1E&t BI'I»a&y — =i ]@, liIsII iE i",wi ee Ia isis asm 131I IIIHmmR lllll &m IIII": II — -Hmls ==' — =.:,-=: „,gp -'"='jj! g&iI &~ RIQP ~!i~ j!!!Rl g yg@G i i ~% !! =~()g/j/'+ 1 IILRI . .". g[ . — -—. rEIE a4&misiiiggP g(&%mls imLmilllJg/gggmH&m " '),"'''l-I.-u . ==,. =.,".== --,. -- — — , m,i'. I 'R= — '~~&'Ha&elm'EE=: — ~aaeca~sg ~~~ 'mE ",- Pk. & :' ' ~ ~ ~ i-'-„',~.... ~ '!m '',~, l'm,im,,:,-,„==.= I —, aj BmEI~I !''-'-'I&&I Ail g~4~=- -- — @[ @&&,«s'' Wh RI&H!/ 'as=='" F— ~ ~ j --=-.ill i~~egmgm/I mp»"'msaH!& a III' sm~ggg THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PORT COQUITLAM MEMORANDUM TO: Environmental Protection Committee FROM: C.F. (Kip) Gaudry, P. Eng. Deputy City Enghieer SUBJECT: Intrawest Site DATE: July 30, 1991 Recommendation: For Information 8 ac~kound 8'r Coniments: Igor Zahynacz and I met with Glen Sigurdson and Denny Zadak of Intrawest Ltd. to discuss the site remediation of their property at Shaughnessy and Lougheed. Currently, the land is one large fee sunple lot and they originally had proposed to separate into three major lots and develop each independantly. When it was discovered that portions of the site were contaminated, the entire subdivision process came to a hault. They have now reapproached us to see whether we would consider subdividing tl.e uncontaminated area froin the contaminated area, and allowing at least partial development to go ahead. We did not have the benefit of the actual soils report and proposed remediation plan at the meeting. The gentlemen suggested that it would be coming shortly, as it was just coming off the press this day. I pointed out the following items: That I would not recommend that the land be subdivided since the contaminated site would be isolated into its own parcel of land with fee simple ownership, and developers could simply walk away from the land leaving an orphaned site for the City to pick up the remediation costs on. That it was premature to make comments on the soils report remediation plan, since we had not seen it. That we have asked that the City has asked the Ministry of Environment for the opportunity to comment on any proposed remediation plan from the Intrawest site or the CN landsite. That the material classified as special waste cannot leave the actual site before it is remediated without a special series of permits obtained from the Federal and Provincial Governments. Cont 'd /2... ~lig il „ gRl~Wl~~~'~~ i~ ! &&tgg — ' fpjl i &i a gjjj se &e iimi%lj IRIR Q/Pjj g$ f~j~'::: a llfaaiis a +& lj'I~jtt ~ jaggy&ljg ~)m IQ Report to BPC Cont'd... That the City would definitely want to know the amount of contamination on CP lands before any decision was made on the Intrawest lands since the two are closely tied together and it is virtually impossible to deal with one without the other. Igor Zahynacz also pointed out that the entire subject of liability would have to be dealt with and agreed to prior to any agreement from the Municipality. We also suggested that as an ongoing process the City would attend any meetings and information sessions upcoming on the subject of the contamination of these lands. , C.F. (Ktp) Gaudry, P. Deputy City Engineer CFG:gc lHIL at Iliig7888 )L'fl'llf II Ill%It lttgllti l ~ »«ii ISI/g[][i t ~ j 'g 5'~ :'llf]iNi / =,~-.'meAi 0 yl i~ =3 Sllig f'='.@as~~ .-'='~ — '" "IIIIII aNtÃllla '- t tt gII lttgllw sr ~ if /gal' ~ , W —. t rtu - — -----..--.-9/~/(lg ' '" a ~,".'. 'ill ff's ' »~/liat ~ ' ~tq& ~~g .i ie ---,=;-".: ..~qpL gpss 63Ne Ngg ata m ma aa~ g~p~iN ~~~g~~tatiaaN~~&MRNtwSlgglg~am ~OMNI ICRl6i=. ~s5 l1$ lhmeg,a P/)N'Aiitit: 8: -:=:."- =:: %I'ase zzrs m:i —:Llll i R "'.='-=.= =lijiJlll) -"" '-=- --ze1II /)Ill tjR:.,~~,~ ! LEGEND — Contaminated soil zones too gj;,~',„.'ImvM i ace&ijgjl 9 I I o Leach LF /r/ eid Vitreous pipe '3"""'D //l Development Sita X I, IIR:=:,-='=-,'=~~ / 'll e~~jll Ii5 RHI IIFI 5 jl / / [1'I!" EA CP Lands g Na WS ~ i %IIII I III ~leam/I =— Area of Greatest CP Lands Rig' mt gll5 iilm'i 7 +IS! 1! itt It-: — i-. + Contaminati ime !55,H.'!li&IiL~" ]! IJllhW ILIAD — —.=~ LI51IRatrmE ~-I ma I,'e-;," — 5;5g ,m~a '=:;.=„~!II 9I m eet ~ e sL ma e s s. -. EE ~l~ — - ''' Mt id k I ~»z-IiiiiIKg~~ga,lilies jjjiNlllllt( &gg ~+ a~a ] THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PORT COQUITLAM MEMORANDUM TO: Environmental Protection Committee FROM: C.F. (Kip) Gaudry, P. Eng. Deputy City Engineer SUB JECT: DRAFT SOIL DEPOSIT BYLAW DATE: October 23, 1991 S~Yt CONTAMINATED MATERIAL 1) No person can deposit 'contatninated material'n any lands - except as allowed after treatment to levels indicated as Schedule 'A'. CONSTRUCITON DEBRIS 2) No construction debris can be deposited. bricks, masonry, concrete, asphalt or other rubble. plaster, gyproc, glass, tile or sinular construction debris. EXCEPIT~ON 3) 4) 15~,- Exceptions - fill material can be: a) manure, composts, mulches or sod and items for gardening & farming. b) woodchips, hog fuel, sawdust up to 10cm (4 inches) for gardening, and farming and landscaping. c) wood waste from processing or manufacturing situated on same lot or adjoining property. OTHER EXEMPITONSt a) Highway repairs (Municipal/Provincial roads). b) Public Works projects. c) Stored as product of manufacturing process and used within three months. d) Used for buiding approval by Plumbing or Building Permit and shown on plans. e) Does'not exceed 50 cubic metres per year. ~II nfl'lf Cont'd .../2 I a %%M a I g~ j~ ~ & '~g lj itttltm jtJ)g~ — RiaR:,:.=,=--= Rlii'"':: +g ..". 'lM!, qg "tJISI "— ! ~,; j gaa —:,+g ~pil~ gjj~gglmlMNi Jgg/ ~ uil~~~+gg(g~ K~g~ /m/g( a%~5IIRataa~iaal~mttatSiauaaa mi~ ~a ~ ~ —- $ tiara~ IRlgjj)(g( 5) PERMT Will require all usual information on legal description of lot, name, address etc. State measures being incorporated to protect public and prevent dmnage. Routes for trucks. Copies of all pertinent pernuts. 6) vOLUME 3 Less than 50 m /year - no permit required. 3 More than 100 m /year - permit with report certifying soil not contaminated. / More than 200 m year - permit plus soil certification plus survey plan of property showing contours. 7) RATES a) Initial permit fee - $ 50.00 b) Plus $ 0.10/m in excess of 100 m /year 3 8) Permit good for six months. Cannot be renewed - must be applied for over again. 9) PROPOSED CHANG~ a) That subdivisions be exempt from fees but remain under regulations. b) That consideration be given to handling plumbing and building permits sunilar to c) That this bylaw re revised to include soil removal. d) That cont~ninated soil be clearly controlled in and out of the City as well as within the City. "a" above. Ill 1 ) .",== -~ Qmemaasa%+~lll)IIIIISlilll5@W+~~siP if+/Ng/@Pl a us~ IIM4allp~j~ N[ / Nsatf+f~p THE CORPORATION OF THE C1TY OF PORT COQU1TLAM MEMORANDUM TO: DATE: October 23, 1991 Public Services Committee Public Works Committee Parks & Recreation Conunittee Planning Committee FROM: Environmental Protection Committee SUB JECT: PROPOSED SOIL DBPOS1T BYLAW RBCO~ATlONt 'A'f the draft bylaw be adopted as the City's limits for the That Schedule definition of contaminated soil (these lhnits are the same as used for the Pacific Place standards as issued by the Ministry of Environment). 2) 3) II 4) 5) That the permit fee as outlined in clause 14 of the proposed bylaw be amended to indicate a charge of $ 0.10 per cubic metre for all materials dep sited on lands in excess of 100 cubic metres per year with no maximum amount per lot. That all materials deposited in Port Coquitlam under the jurisdiction of the proposed bylaw and originating from places outside of Port Coquitlam automaticaUy be required to furnish proof that they are not contaminated according to schedule 'A'. That the Soil Deposit Bylaw be expanded (or a new bylaw created) that would cover the removal of material from lots in a snnilar manner and form as the Soil Deposit Bylaw. That the City use the proposed bylaw to prohibit the movement of any contaminated soils in or out of the City or between lots in the City where the contaminated materials have not been remediated to the standards as outlined in schedule 'A'. glstail Ia Ml ~ Cont'd .,./2 C~C/f g 31'III WIIAje ag-=ee=-. Ill IIIII w;...In~»~ a~asIIP apig ~lfl~,isi~ IasI'... IIIat i i " ~aI ~ ~~ In i m: --~ ~ +aIEQI~IIIII'~~ISIstiaail =!R11IIII¹l M% iiis ~ilim+'I a+InII IsI Ilail~+ ail st 118 == Il I I — —— — e i=+I I~ ~ t sana BACKGROUND & COMMENTS: The Environmental Protection Committee has been reviewing the proposed Soil Deposit Bylaw and have arrived at the above noted five reconunendations. Attached to this report is the proposed bylaw and a summary of the bylavr with editorial conunents as prepared by the Deputy City Engineer. In addition, also attached is the recent letter to Grant Anderson and his response. We are asking each Committee to review the bylaw and report as to any proposed changes and in pedicular how it might effect admuustrative staff iu each of the jurisdictional areas. Once ail comments are received it is the Envirotunental Protect on Committee's intention to recouunend the bylaw to Council as soon as possible. C.F. (Kip) Gaudry, P. Eng. Deputy City Engineer CFG:ck 2,40 SHAUGHNESSY STREET TELEPHONE: 944-5411 FAX: 944-5402 PORT COQUITLAM, B.C. VSC 2AS OUR FILE October 24, 1991 I idstone, Young, Baker 4 Anderson 1414 - 808 Nelson Street Box 12147, Nelson Square V'ancouver, B.C. V'6Z 2H2 Attention: Grant Anderson Dear Sir: %El SOIL DBPOSTI BYLAW'he Environmental Protection Committee has had on opportunity to review the proposed Soil Deposit Bylaw and as a result have asked me to gain legal opinion on three major areas. These areas are as folio~a: 1. a) Can subdivisions be exempted from the fee but still be under the regulatory part of the Bylaw7 b) Similarly should we handle building arid plutnbing perm ts in the same manner7 a) Could this bylaw be amended in such a manner as to also cover the aspect of soil removal? We do presume that it would then require the approval of the Ministry of Energy Mines and Resources prior to going to Municipal Affairs. b) Would it be your advice to look at it as a separate Bylaw? a) It is the City's intention to prohibit the movement of any contaminated soils in or out of the City or between lots in the City. Does the Bylaw as it is currently written cover this aspect clearly? In our review to date we feel it may not be clearly outlined. Cont'd .../2 b) Does the City have the right under the Municipal Act to regulate the movement of soil within a single private property7 If we do would it only cover contaminated soll or lll fact all soll? Council is very interested in proceeding with the Bylaw as soon as possible and therefore your earliest written comments would be greatly appreciated. Yours truly, C.F. (Kip) Gaudry, P. Eng. Deputy City Engineer CFG:ck cc: Alderman Keryluk Alderman Talbot Bryan Kirk, City Administrator Igor Zahynacz, P. Eng„City Engineer