Routley Avenue/Horricon Streot,
Port Coquitlas.

Augort 2ith, 1972.

. a en Mohan
Mayor 8. Scott & Aldernea, g
nity Hall,

Port Coquitlen, 5.6,

Sires

As sothers of young children in this subdivision, ve abould like
to express to Council cur concern regarding access to Kilner Blanentary
Sehcol and the row Park nearby.

At presont, the only eccoss route for our children is a footpath “i : S830 Fem f{ hig he
at the extrecity of ierrison Streat, which 1s narrow, cyergrom, and logged Ss =
with oud in vet woatner.

j ;
The alternstive routa, which vs find entirely unacceptable, would ‘ xo ‘
be of scae 4 blocks cr so, using Pitt River Road. Our children would have € W
to cope vith the recultant longer distances the heavy treffic found con- J
timaliy on Fitt River Road: the fact that tent is no crosswalk at the .
Routley avenue/#itt River Read intersection (thie teing virtually 3 blind .
4926 "ge Fee vet,
o-

at - . 4 nara .
yeinrt, [820 Rowling Civerire xX
N

corer" in any event); etc.

We kad alvays been led to believe that sccoss to the Park and
Sebool would be available to the children living on this subdivision by
using the Morrison Strect route. Rut, as alroady mentioned, after 3 or 4
yours, ve find the footpath our ciildren.nust use is still unsatisfactory
and, in fact, is cftcn alzest inpassable.

Purther, we nov widerstand that sore private hoses are to be built ‘
at the end of Norrisoa Street sonetine tn the future. Lagat Miche / IST Luh he eg Wee.

In view of the foregoing, we therefore respectfully and urgently

apks Haag heal be. L933 Plearezan. Lf :

(2) . Can cur children be assured of accoss st aj} tines in the
future to the School. and Park via the route wentioned in
the second paragraph of this letter?

(2) May wo please have thie footpath improved upea at the
srliect pesaiblo onncrtuaity, and certainly prior to the
Jato Fall acc eiso Lefore the private hones ere erected in
that area?

- Very truly yours,

- (SAgnaturop attached)

eet eb / ae Meatloaf es
Neder Yaad dds Mognise a

ofr