bn ie ot lie

nde , of, te ie Ase PaO)

Hi gitar

Min eigeee's i

fade ak i Rr ’ ranee : 4. : " i im : * I ef Sa ee Oe avi ‘ aaa D Nt; hax : : th ‘ " iP SEE MMe aes varet, be. Me tolie LUM EN im i I dae a tag) be at SARE ORE OE MIRO ERY a RAT SN AHMET key tia jaa

ipyaed ara

tet (ae ay eit

DISCUSS TOM:

The proposed development generally conforma with the deaign guidelines outlined in Development Permit Area VI of the Official Commmity Plan.

The applicant ia requesting 4 height relawation for tha buildingas due to the floodplain restrictions, the parking otructure cannot be lowered very far into the ground. The proposed building exceeds the permitted 39 feet height limit by 3 feet. The central portion of the building exceada the limit by 9 feet,

iain tt ck The Planning Department supports the height relaxation as the budlding is iain Ms terraced back from the street at each floor, which reduces its volumetric oT) impact on the etreet. The building 4a also terraced at the rear to reduce the impact of the building on neighbouring properties and provide for better Light anglew into the suites.

The front yard setback haa been reduced in accordance with the guidelines for Development Permit Area VI. Partial relaxation of the gideyard setbacks from 25 feet to 11 and 12 feet is alao required to accommodate the building design. (Only secondary windows face the side yard along a limited portion of the building). Mdnor siting changes may be required to accommodate the needed Widening of Wilson Avenue.

Indoor and outdoor recreation areas are provided in accordance with bylaw requirements.

TOA Th ast

Pare “3

Aa this building generally complies with the guidelines for the Downtown Development Permit Arwa, it ia recommended that thia application be approved to proceed.

vs 5

” fd

. V7 Carlos FelipyM. Avch., M.C.I.P. Registexed Platiner Director of Planning

Pa a”

JL/kiec

TD587~-19/21.

ee OEM was rie

Te